hockeykicker
Global Moderator
- Dec 3, 2014
- 35,786
- 13,870
okay forgot he is finnish so no chance at all lmaoTolvanen waived. Caps should be 300% on him, IMO this guy still has so much potential, plays 200 ft game and can snipe. Screw stats especially from this season, i just have feeling he'll still end up as a good scoring threat with sound 2-way game
Low.While I'm not against rolling the dice on Tolvanen, I don't think anything about his history in Nashville makes it seem like we're the team to rejuvenate him here. Hell, didn't he already have issues with Lavi? I swear I remember him coming over and supposed to be the savior one playoff run and Lavi and the team didn't play him because he wasn't up to snuff.
Though that might be my impression because I still follow Vingan from his Caps stint.
As for a Kuznetsov trade, what do people think his return would actually be? I've never seen a concrete idea on what people expect in a return for trading him.
Colorado is the team that jumps to mind, especially if they still have LTIR to play with closer to the deadline. They have a gap at 2C (well 1C as well with MacKinnon on LTIR), and are clearly aiming to continue contending. The two years remaining is the biggest hang-up, especially with MacKinnon's new contract kicking in next year. But they also have Erik Johnson's $6M coming off the books (which pays for Mack's raise), so with some smart maneuvers and/or retention by the Capitals, they could make it work.Not sure there's a cap fit with Minny & Kuz. There's Dumba but he's fallen off a good bit and is similarly buyer beware. I mean, I guess returns could be worse if they mainly want to get out of the term remaining (and I would think cap space would be the primary asset gained). It makes some sense with Kaprizov there but the Caps aren't going to want to retain if that's what it takes. And Guerin is probably not primarily interested given some of the question marks with the player and their tight margins due to dead cap buyouts.
It's more of an off-season move and even then there's probably only a handful of teams that make sense. Maybe Montreal. CBJ if he's open to playing with Gaudreau. Chicago.
They most certainly would get more than cap space come on….Low.
He's enigmatic low-end 1C with lots of term left and several red flags around him. In terms of trade value it's not the best thing that he has basically said in an interview that he doesn't give 100% effort all the time. He also has that cocaine thing dragging his value down.
I think there are teams willing to take a swing at him but i don't see much coming back to be honest. They'd get some cap space to use but that’s propably it.
Like any other Cap IMO…..eligible to be part of a good hockey trade, but not a sell off, not yet.My point in bringing up the Kuznetsov discussion was more that, even the majority who want him traded don't think/know that he'll get a good return. I'd probably put out there that Kuzy as he is now is still move valuable then anything you'd get in a trade, unless someone wows you. I guess that math changes if Backstrom can come back at close to 80 or 90 percent but that's still well up in the air.
As long as the game means something, they’ll keep pulling the goalies….The empty net thing is going to get very interesting as he gets closer to breaking Gretzky's record. I wonder if you'll see teams choosing to not pull the goalie (if it's a "non crucial" game for example) just to be spiteful and make if more difficult? I'm pretty sure Jersey refused to pull the goalie a few seasons back in order to deny him reaching 50 goals?
No word on when Wilson or Backstrom return, but based off how the caps are handling it both seem to have a similar timeline (late this month/early january? not sure)Any word on when we might see Wilson return?
The empty net thing is going to get very interesting as he gets closer to breaking Gretzky's record. I wonder if you'll see teams choosing to not pull the goalie (if it's a "non crucial" game for example) just to be spiteful and make if more difficult? I'm pretty sure Jersey refused to pull the goalie a few seasons back in order to deny him reaching 50 goals?
2015-2018 was definitely Kuznetsov's prime statistically, and that makes sense given his age at that time (23-25, typically considered to be the most impactful age of NHL forwards).
Since the Cup win and aside from 2020-21 Kuznetsov has been pretty bad overall. Since 2018-19 he's in the bottom third of the league in GAR/60. That's not great for a 1C on a team hoping to compete! It's not tenable going forward at his price point.
Strome, in the meantime, is in the top third of the league in the same GAR/60 metric. I don't think Strome is a great option going forward as a 1C because his highs aren't terribly high, but I think he can at least hold the fort and be a perfectly good 2C if Washington somehow finds a 1C in-house or in a trade/free-agency.
It's a small sample, but Strome and Ovechkin have made things happen so far:
The goals aren't there yet, but the Strome/Ovechkin duo has had a bunch of games like last night where they've created sustained pressure but been a bit unlucky to not pot a goal or two.
If I'm planning for next year I don't really know where Kuznetsov should fit in, with or without Backstrom returning. Strome right now is a keeper. He's younger and better than Kuznetsov right now, and I highly doubt he's going to come in close to Kuznetsov's $7.8 million.
Hey guys, do you think Lindgren gets the start tomorrow with how he’s been playing?