What miserable narrative, it's a literal fact. They traded someone, he's now immensely better then he was there. Please tell me where there's "narrative" in that. That's happened enough times to not be some made up narrative.Ignore whatever you want to fit your miserable narrative.
You and your friend really think you've got a gotcha there, but I'm not sure the content police have a law against talking about people who left and excelled.
You guys are f”ing miserable to sit and read…..that BS. You complain over and over and f‘ing over again and again…..the nonstop negatively is painful.What miserable narrative, it's a literal fact. They traded someone, he's now immensely better then he was there. Please tell me where there's "narrative" in that. That's happened enough times to not be some made up narrative.
How about instead of trying to police any discussion you don't like you just don't engage. We were content without the childish tempertantrums.
its a discussion board, what do you wanna discuss? There's plenty of circle jerking to be had, but the team stinks right now so yes there will be complaintsYou guys are f”ing miserable to sit and read…..that BS. You complain over and over and f‘ing over again and again…..the nonstop negatively is painful.
If that's not allowed, may as well delete the board.Also I think it's perfectly reasonable for internet posters to use hindsight to criticize a move made in the past.
Who cares if I didn't speak out against the trade when it happened? Unlike Brian MacLellan, I'm not paid millions of dollars to get theses types of moves right! He deserves criticism for getting it wrong!
Anything not lost in constant negativity….its a discussion board, what do you wanna discuss? There's plenty of circle jerking to be had, but the team stinks right now so yes there will be complaints
Attacked? Good sir, you attacked me first for merely pointing out how successful some players we had last year have been. I literally posted a screenshot of league leaders with no real commentary associated with it. I think you’re in the wrong in this situation but you do you.Is it fun for you to keep being reminded of now nice things we no longer have, even if they weren’t that great when we did have them? What purpose does all the constant bitching and moaning here have?
You can already see the lack of activity here because of it. Say anything and you’re immediately attacked. Soon you HFTN and the crew will be here all by yourselves complaining to the wall. Enjoy.
Unfortunately at the time of the trade I wasn't as well-versed in player isolates vs. on-ice metrics (where he was still very good but I chalked it up to easier deployment). Had I known what I know now about isolated impact statistics I think I would have been ranting against the trade nonstop rather than my lukecold "it's fine if they get a significant piece in a separate trade" (which they also didn't do).
Also I think it's perfectly reasonable for internet posters to use hindsight to criticize a move made in the past.
Who cares if I didn't speak out against the trade when it happened? Unlike Brian MacLellan, I'm not paid millions of dollars to get theses types of moves right! He deserves criticism for getting it wrong!
Ok man….maybe that’s part of the problem, your perception. Show me where I “attacked” you. I made a blanket statement to exactly nobody directly, then you and some of your cronies in the misery crew were all immediately up my ass. I didn’t even respond to your post with the leaders and it wasn’t even what was referred to.Attacked? Good sir, you attacked me first for merely pointing out how successful some players we had last year have been. I literally posted a screenshot of league leaders with no real commentary associated with it. I think you’re in the wrong in this situation but you do you.
Ok man….maybe that’s part of the problem, your perception. Show me where I “attacked” you. I made a blanket statement to exactly nobody directly, then you and some of your cronies in the misery crew were all immediately up my ass. I didn’t even respond to your post with the leaders and it wasn’t even what was referred to.
Misery? I’m feeling great today but thank you. Is it misery to talk shop and stats? I don’t get why you think that is pessimistic. I call that fun.Ok man….maybe that’s part of the problem, your perception. Show me where I “attacked” you. I made a blanket statement to exactly nobody directly, then you and some of your cronies in the misery crew were all immediately up my ass. I didn’t even respond to your post with the leaders and it wasn’t even what was referred to.
If you must know, the post mentioning Sieg and Carlson and the Norris was what really annoyed me. As if Siege at his best someday will EVER be in a real conversation for Norris contention like Carlson was.
I appreciate that instead of just calling people bitchey, that you actually took part in the convo and argued a point. We need more of this and less of the topic policing.IMHO there’s nothing wrong with talking about how former players are doing elsewhere. Just seems like many revel in pointing out those excelling elsewhere, like they are just looking for reasons to hate the organization and make GMBM/Lavi look like fools.
It’s very “Redskinny” imho, but hey if that’s your opinion of the situation, and makes you excited - more power to you.
Anyways - let’s discuss. The Chara move that forced Seigs out was not crazy. The team was trying to win a Cup (something everyone has wanted since ‘18) in a shortened season. Player development was not the priority. Chara was a “win now” move, and it’s not like he was terrible while here. He totally changed Jensen’s game for the better. In hindsight it’s very easy to say we should have kept Seigs, and yea - it’s a big miss for the org.
But guys like Sprong and Sammy - seems like nothing makes a player more popular around here than leaving the organization. Sammy has played 9 games (to Darcy’s 20), and isn’t necessarily their #1 over Matt Murray (who just blanked the Stars last night w/44 saves). I don’t recall anyone caring much when Sprong was traded - but now he’s apparently the missing piece we always needed. I suppose he’ll be the new Vrana, with guys breathlessly falling over each other to post every time he scores.
I don’t rely on drinking. You call it bitching, I call it trying to make some people aware of the miserable time they’re contributing to our little Caps community here. So yeah I’ll continue to respond as I see fit to this constant drivel, within the same forum rules as everyone else.They call it discussion, you call it bitching. The thing I personally find tiresome is this right here^. The bitching about the bitching. And especially when the bitching about the bitching begets more bitching, like a snake eating its tail.
The forum has mods. We don't also need a referee to tell us what's out of bounds, especially ones that draw their own arbitrary lines.
This is why they invented daydrinking.
Literally nobody has this idea or has said that.The argument that the GM doesn't deserve criticism for his bad moves because the fans on hfboards.com were okay with the move at the time is truly an all time great.
This is the shit that makes these boards unreadable at times….pining over multiple guys who weren’t good enough here.
Agreed. My original post, criticizes Murray but says I don’t miss them. I’m just perturbed how Murray still has a job.VV and Sammie were just that for the Caps. I don't regret it one bit, even if one of them lead their teams to a SC.
Is it really validation of Murray being deficient or simply two guys playing on younger stacked teams? If Keumper regresses big time, I’ll be on board with the Murray angst….Holtby was a regressing (aging/fading) asset his last few seasons here, then the last two G’s. I’m interested to see him work with a front line starter like DK to see what’s up.Agreed. My original post, criticizes Murray but says I don’t miss them. I’m just perturbed how Murray still has a job.
If it was just Siegenthaler or just Samsonov, it would be one thing. But it's not. It's Siegenthaler, Samsonov, Vanecek, Stephenson, Sprong, and Burakovsky. (And that's not even touching on the Vrana-Mantha trade.) It's that we see the same patterns regarding inconsistent developmental tracks and veteran roadblocks playing out on the current Capitals roster. It's that management has made this very same mistake several times, and at this point it's very much not a fluke. And it's that management seemingly hasn't learned from making this mistake in the past, and is continuing to repeat the process. It's that management hasn't addressed some of the key individuals behind these issues, despite all the mounting evidence that they're part of the problem.