CapitalsCupReality
It’s Go Time!!
- Feb 27, 2002
- 66,456
- 21,477
Would love to know who, say the top 10 options are out there….even if just in North America. Not asking you, just don’t know who we would even have to choose from besides the unemployed retreads we all know, and a few NHL assistants.I think this team is done with disciplinarians, at least for now. We need a modern hockey mind behind the bench. If we're going to ride or die with so many of our vets, it's time for them to hold each other accountable so we can employ a coaching staff that gets us playing a more modern, dynamic, and less predictable game.
Time to find out what we have in MacLellan, too. So much about the "our coach hates young players but our GM doesn't" argument simply doesn't track. If he's part of that equation, it needs to stop. So many of the personnel gaffes we've made have appeared to be more coaching related, but Mac always either acquires, re-signs, or keeps the vet that coach needs to make the shortsighted decision in the first place.
These are among the very top things we need to address in the offseason; maybe just as important is the infusion of new talent. The thought of Mac giving Laviolette an extension -- suggesting neither is even on the hotseat -- gives me dry heaves right now.
Would love to know who, say the top 10 options are out there….even if just in North America. Not asking you, just don’t know who we would even have to choose from besides the unemployed retreads we all know, and a few NHL assistants.
This team has had several seasons of mediocre passing and unimaginative play under several coaches. Late Boudreau, Hunter, Oates, parts of Trotz’ tenure, and Rierden. Are they all from past centuries? Carolina is a proficient forechecking team, they just do it better than we do. Their game works well in modern times. Lavi activating d-men is definitely a more modern concept.I hear you, and I'd like a scouting report on coaches, too. We can't keep being the team that employs the retreads (or the respected guys that are becoming retreads as we speak) while other teams benefit from making bolder moves, or riding out and developing a coach that shows real promise but needs time.
If we're all about 895 and that's it, sure, get Gabby if Ovi likes him, or lean toward a touted offensive coaching prospect and see what you get. Great coaches fall out of favor sometimes, so maybe there'll be one we can grab up. But our game needs to move into the 21st century.
Parity is a double edged sword though. It makes it equally difficult to claw your way back into a playoff spot when you fall a few points behind. Because all those other teams that are in a playoff spot are continuing to win at the same percentage that got them there in the first place.While I'm not holding my breath, if this team starts getting better and healthier, it's nowhere near a lost cause
I generally look at seasons in 10-game increments (8x10 + gms 81/82)
if we're getting at least 12 pts per 10 (6-4-0 avg) like a normal year
that's 72 points in last 60 games + 2 or 3 pts for gms 81/82,
that puts at 91/92
This being the season of parity, I think the magic # could be as low as 94 pts. (NYR --current WC2-- is pacing for 95 pts.)
cpl of decent streaks where we can get 14-15 pts in 10 gms and this could be an interesting season
You'd have to be a stone cold f***ing idiot to value those earnings while they kill your development and potential to make so much more than that.What do you think Lavi is going to say?
"I talked to Connor and he was very pissed off about this. He hates that he made a quarter million dollars instead of 25K and is mad at me. I'm going to text him a smiling emoji later and hopefully he'll text me back."
Jesus.
and often times decent teams that haven't gotten a break, and haven't been healthy all of a sudden get a break, get a cpl players back, and go on a real tear; winning can be contagiousParity is a double edged sword though. It makes it equally difficult to claw your way back into a playoff spot when you fall a few points behind. Because all those other teams that are in a playoff spot are continuing to win at the same percentage that got them there in the first place.
A good indicator is to sort standings by conference and look at "last 10 games", so you can see how many points out of a possible 20 each team has gotten. You will often see that unless a team goes on an extended winning or losing streak, almost the entire league will track the same and barely change position (especially with regards to playoffs after Thanksgiving). So it's not about keeping up, it's about gaining ground once you've fallen back.
Personally, I'm not even sure I want to see this team spend the entire season chasing a WC2 spot, because you know when the playoffs roll around the old guys will have nothing left in the tank, be banged up (even more), and likely can't get past the 1st round. And especially if playing catch up for the next 60 games means no changes to coaching, no changes to the lineup, and that insufferably ineffective power play with it's inability to enter the zone and that stupid slingshot pass. Let's change things up, rock the boat, and see a different hockey team on the ice!!
I don’t see it as much about Lavi’s style not being modern as does what he’s coaching make the best use of his personnel.
Hey, more power to you for being hopeful and positive. Not going to shit on somebody for that!!and often times decent teams that haven't gotten a break, and haven't been healthy all of a sudden get a break, get a cpl players back, and go on a real tear; winning can be contagious
Who's to say what will happen the next 20 games?
I, for one, am not afraid to be hopeful and positive (which puts me clearly in the minority here)
oh dope so they just have to lose in OT or win outright from now to the end of the season.105 pt pace is 1.28 pts per game…..14 in 10 is 1.4. 1.4 the rest of the season gets them to 100…
You'd have to be a stone cold f***ing idiot to value those earnings while they kill your development and potential to make so much more than that.
Nobody's living the rest of their life on 250k, a real NHL career is something you can make last. This really isn't complicated. If McMichael is stupid enough to value this very short term money over betting on himself we might as well just get rid of the kid now and bring in somebody with a brain.
Not that I disagree with your assertion but I do think it’s important to note that out of the 17 games they’ve played, only two have been against Metro division opponents so they still have almost their entire division slate to go. They have plenty of chances remaining for four point swing games.For those thinking that we can just get hot and make up for lost points, keep in mind that we have the most games played but the second fewest points in the division. So we would have to get hot and the three teams just above us would have to get cold at the same time.
I don't want to be the doom & gloom guy but it's pretty obvious that this team is not making the playoffs. It's obvious when watching games, watching the roster, watching the stats and watching the standings.
There's just no indicators that we'll get better. Wilson coming back is great but he'll be rusty. Orlov coming back is good but we weren't that good with him either.
The best thing for the team is to accept reality and become massive sellers and try and build a fairly competitive future by replenishing a pretty meagre prospect pool anyway they can. Doing that and getting Ovi to 895 shoul be the priority going forward.
Not that I disagree with your assertion but I do think it’s important to note that out of the 17 games they’ve played, only two have been against Metro division opponents so they still have almost their entire division slate to go. They have plenty of chances remaining for four point swing games.
While certainly true and possible, I find the limitations of Carlson/Kuznetsov/Strome as two-way players and the unreliability of the PP to be limitations that will be hard to overcome even when they're collectively on their game. There is a peak to how effective they can be when healthy and it's not amazing. They're capable of going on a roll, backed by goaltending and being just opportunistic enough, but I'm not sure the sense and athleticism still plays enough. The next few weeks, with such a heavy road slate, could be crucial in determining whether they can maintain close enough proximity to not fall too significantly behind as to have too little margin for error.and often times decent teams that haven't gotten a break, and haven't been healthy all of a sudden get a break, get a cpl players back, and go on a real tear; winning can be contagious
Who's to say what will happen the next 20 games?
I, for one, am not afraid to be hopeful and positive (which puts me clearly in the minority here)
I think you’ll see that this summer. What they’re likely not going to do is, tear it down early.Im just curious what management is aiming for. Like i know playoffs is good revenue but even in an ideal world, anything beyond a first round exit just seems unlikely for this team. So isn't it better to do a controlled demolition/rebuild than to just wait for the team to completely crumble?
Big picture I think it needs to be looked at as: are they better than two of FLA/NYI/NYR/PIT? That's a tough ask. The Islanders could fade. The Rangers haven't been great. That's already more or less disbelieving in DET and you never know. I tend to believe FLA/PIT figure it out and then there's the strong likelihood those teams improve at the trade deadline. Injuries could be a key factor but hard to believe the Caps will exceedingly luck out in that regard.
So then if they find themselves at the juncture where they maybe need to add just to keep up with those teams they need to ask themselves if the cost is worth it and what their main objectives are. What's the value in, say, qualifying only to face BOS? Would that secure a Lavi extension? Is there a scenario where a Lavi extension is feasible? So many questions surrounding them that they'll rather quickly need to put to rest in the coming month or so to track well enough to take them seriously.
We’ve never seen them be a team that sells off pieces very often, unless it’s a situation where they are proactive at moving a contract early. (Brooks Laich comes to mind)I think you’ll see that this summer. What they’re likely not going to do is, tear it down early.