Here is the GAR chart (vs. the xGAR
@pman25 posted):
xGAR probably has more meaning right now because xG performs better in smaller sample sizes, though both need to be taken with big grains of salt right now because these are regression models designed to input a lot of data. Without large amounts of data the GAR elements are going to come with some pretty high errors this early in the season.
That said it's encouraging that Eller is playing well in particular along with Mantha, but I don't think this overall paints too optimistic a picture because their depth players (in general) have been very good while their stars have been the weak points over the past few years. Maybe that will change and again, the data is still pretty unreliable but I don't think many here think the team is being bolstered by their stars right now (except Kuemper if you want to consider him a star, which I do). We've seen the same formula of late and it's led to first round exits each year.
"Indefinitely" doesn't sound great. But again I don't see too much of a dropoff just because I don't see much of a dropoff between Oshie and, say, McMichael/Milano/whoever. They should be fine. The Carlson injury could be much more impactful if they don't adjust the power play properly.
Also put Nic Dowd in the bumper spot on the PP. He's a better option than Hathaway and he can win faceoffs.