I don’t think you can question Lavi’s ability to coach. He’s only the fourth coach in history to coach three separate teams to the Stanley Cup Final. He has the most wins of any American-born coach and he’s one of only 10 coaches in history to rack up 700 wins behind the bench. He’s a Stanley Cup winner, a first ballot HoFer, and clearly can coach the shit out of some hockey and get guys to play his system, which works.
What you can question is his personnel decisions throughout the course of a season and the way he develops young players but saying he’s not a good enough coach… if he’s not then there are maybe two or three guys in the NHL right now with a better resume. Maybe.
I agree with you on Laviolette, but your post kinda reads like this:
I don't think you can question Gordon Ramsey's ability as a chef. He's won a zillion awards, several Michelin stars, and owned a bunch of successful restaurants.
What you
can question is his ability to cook food and have it served to people.
Personnel decisions and player development are pretty huge aspects of his job to be dodgy at. We've seen a bunch of old school coaches struggle lately. Has the modern game begun to pass them by? Has the attitude and sense of entitlement of the more recent generations and society in general started to make a "100% accountability" system and approach less effective? Is he getting more crotchety and apt to discipline these days or with this particular group of players?
Or is everything pretty much fine and we're just kinda bitchy and reactionary?
In fairness, the truth is probably some combination of all of that, with a heftier dose of that last one than we'd like to admit.