Speculation: Caps General Discussion (Coaching/FAs/Cap/Lines etc) - 2020 Offseason Pt. 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

francaisvolantsparis

Registered User
Nov 21, 2018
1,540
568
Nice
I guess so. I don’t think rehashing what GMGM did back in the early 00’s has to do with anything now.

sure, some people may argue against you (I honestly think it’s more arguing against you than arguing against your point), but it’s water so far under the bridge....that’s it’s hard to even see anymore.

I just think it’s pretty much irrelevant now.
I should have a key to some of their secrets, if they are so negative toward everything I say. Seriously, I cannot even say 1+1=2 without them starting a fight.
 

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
66,507
21,564
Drunk opinion + not real fans = worth taking issue with.

There’s an old saying, if you look around the room and see nothing but assholes, you’re probably the asshole.

now, if you can debate civilly instead of asking people if they understand all of the time, maybe hurl less direct insults, maybe we can get back to hockey?
 

Skrudland2Lomakin

Registered User
Jan 1, 2011
7,698
5,721
I don’t have an issue with your takes, but it’s that lack of actual substance behind them.

it’s not 1+1=2, it’s “The Capitals did 1+1=2, so by that we can assume everyone else in the league was doing advanced trigonometry.”

and then when pressed for some rationale you just move on.


I also think we're kidding ourselves here if we're going to act like you don't know what you're doing. You slide inflammatory statements into things and act like it's a shocker when people bite.


In a conversation regarding our top 6 you're just going to slide that Boyd is better than Backstrom. In a convo regarding the best players on the team you're just going drop Panik in there.

It's okay to actually believe these things, but to act like you're shocked when people bite on it? Come on...


And so when inevitably someone bites you then start to really bolster down and if the debate takes a turn you resort to "troll", drunk, "Holtby's mom", not a real fan, or condescending statements like "Do you understand this?"


I think it's quite possible that you've arrived at this point unintentionally, but I think it's a farce if anyone tries to make you out to being someone who is being picked on.
 
Last edited:

capsdom86

Registered User
May 28, 2015
44
35
I actually can't. We blew the doors off the league for more than 10 years. We were by far the most dominant team in an era that had Geno and Sid.

We could rehash playoff loses all the live long day, but the fact of the matter is that all of those teams managed to get to that position and had the skill to conceivably get beyond it. You'll never convince me that drafting is why we didn't get more Cups. You want to talk coaching philosophy, you want to talk free agent acquisitions, or trades? Sure. Drafting? No, homegrown talent, or lack thereof was never the issue.

I think if we had won only one more Cup I would feel this way. Lots of teams have gone on a run and won one - Carolina, Colorado, Anaheim, Tampa, Dallas, etc. - but if you win two cups, you really move up in the NHL franchise echelon. Winning twice puts you in another category.
 

Skrudland2Lomakin

Registered User
Jan 1, 2011
7,698
5,721
I think if we had won only one more Cup I would feel this way. Lots of teams have gone on a run and won one - Carolina, Colorado, Anaheim, Tampa, Dallas, etc. - but if you win two cups, you really move up in the NHL franchise echelon. Winning twice puts you in another category.
I mean, I'm by no means satisfied with our playoff performances, but I think it's a tough tale to spin that those are directly related to drafting, especially after some many of them came in seasons where we were dominant all year.
 

txpd

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
69,649
14,134
New Bern, NC
I think if we had won only one more Cup I would feel this way. Lots of teams have gone on a run and won one - Carolina, Colorado, Anaheim, Tampa, Dallas, etc. - but if you win two cups, you really move up in the NHL franchise echelon. Winning twice puts you in another category.

The 3 wasted President's Trophy teams would indicate that the team was as good as they were going to get. From their 1st playoff season of the Ovechkin era to present the Caps have the best record in the league. Its hard to ask for a better team. Its not realistic.
 

g00n

Retired Global Mod
Nov 22, 2007
31,305
15,936
Our mistake for decades was failure to draft players who are great in the regular season AND the playoffs.

How did we not see this coming? Someone should be fired for that blunder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Calicaps

francaisvolantsparis

Registered User
Nov 21, 2018
1,540
568
Nice
I don’t have an issue with your takes, but it’s that lack of actual substance behind them.

it’s not 1+1=2, it’s “The Capitals did 1+1=2, so by that we can assume everyone else in the league was doing advanced trigonometry.”

and then when pressed for some rationale you just move on.


I also think we're kidding ourselves here if we're going to act like you don't know what you're doing. You slide inflammatory statements into things and act like it's a shocker when people bite.


In a conversation regarding our top 6 you're just going to slide that Boyd is better than Backstrom. In a convo regarding the best players on the team you're just going drop Panik in there.

It's okay to actually believe these things, but to act like you're shocked when people bite on it? Come on...


And so when inevitably someone bites you then start to really bolster down and if the debate takes a turn you resort to "troll", drunk, "Holtby's mom", not a real fan, or condescending statements like "Do you understand this?"


I think it's quite possible that you've arrived at this point unintentionally, but I think it's a farce if anyone tries to make you out to being someone who is being picked on.
I do not 'slide' inflammatory statements. I believe everything I say. If you are offended by something, try to find why it offends you? The problem is you are offended be anything different from your point of view. It is caricatural at this point. You cannot accept a different point of view. You accuse me of this or that, but the truth is that you accuse me of what you do yourself, and not me. I never look for a fight, I am always happy to end useless conversations.
 

francaisvolantsparis

Registered User
Nov 21, 2018
1,540
568
Nice
The 3 wasted President's Trophy teams would indicate that the team was as good as they were going to get. From their 1st playoff season of the Ovechkin era to present the Caps have the best record in the league. Its hard to ask for a better team. Its not realistic.
If you cannot imagine a better team, doesn't mean someone else cannot. I can Imagine us dominating the League with multiple Cups.
 

VaCaps Fan

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 18, 2018
4,706
7,014
Hockey doesn’t work that way. The draft is a crapshoot more than any other sport.
 

txpd

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
69,649
14,134
New Bern, NC
Someone should be fired for that blunder.

10010061H20355630.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: VaCaps Fan

tenken00

Oh it's going down in Chinatown
Jan 29, 2010
9,939
10,198
Off the top of my head I can think of Fever, Vanecek, AA and AJF as guys who could possibly be loaned overseas. Fever is probably the least likely of the bunch given he probably is a lock to make the Caps opening night roster

Fever is planning to play overseas until the NHL season starts back up.

Martin Fehervary Discusses the Playoffs, Plans To Play In Europe Prior To The Start of The Next NHL Season and Fishing During Quarantine

If he feels like he doesn't needs time off thats fine by me since he's still got young legs.

We all know Protas is loaned to the KHL with his home country Belarus' Dimano Minsk.

I think loaning Alexeyev to the KHL for at least until the AHL season begins might be good for him. Hes been over in North America since such a young age. Give him a chance to play at home for a little bit. AJF too.

VV I want here to be working with whoever is the new goalies coach here with the new coaching staff though.
 
Last edited:

Skrudland2Lomakin

Registered User
Jan 1, 2011
7,698
5,721
I do not 'slide' inflammatory statements. I believe everything I say. If you are offended by something, try to find why it offends you? The problem is you are offended be anything different from your point of view. It is caricatural at this point. You cannot accept a different point of view. You accuse me of this or that, but the truth is that you accuse me of what you do yourself, and not me. I never look for a fight, I am always happy to end useless conversations.
Again, I don't think anyone is offended. But if you're wondering why people seem to have less patience with you it's more of the "drunk", "Holtby's mom", "toxic", "troll", "Do you understand?" etc. and less of your takes.


We've heard a lot of wild takes, most of the posters have been here for a very long time, that's not why people continue to prod at you. The thing that's creating this dynamic is what happens after you offer your opinion, the personal attacks, reluctance to provide follow up information, the condescension, etc.
 

hb13xchamps

Registered User
Dec 23, 2011
9,287
6,286
Pennsylvania
It was borderline laughable because of the terrible draft results in 2002-06. A rebuilding team should do better than League average at drafting job, not be lower the terrible. Only team I can think of are Oilers. We spoiled multiple Ovechkin years. What is uncorrect here?
Going back to just teams in our division's 1st round draft choices between 2002-2006:

Carolina
2002: Cam Ward (1st rounder, #25 overall)
2003: Eric Staal (2nd overall)
2004: Andrew Ladd (4th overall) - Ladd played less than 150 games before being shipped out
2005: Jack Johnson (3rd overall) - Jack Johnson never played a game for the organization
2006: No first rounder

Carolina was solid at identifying talent, but moved on early from 2 of their draft choices. Ladd at 4th overall also isn't great value. 2/4 hits for me considering Johnson at 3rd overall and Ladd at 4th wouldn't happen again in a redraft

Columbus
2002: Rick Nash (1st overall)
2003: Nikolai Zherdev (4th overall)
2004: Alexandre Picard (8th overall)
2005: Gilbert Brule (6th overall)
2006: Derek Brassard (6th overall)

1/5 or 2/5 depending on your feelings for Brassard. So pretty bad picks there

New Jersey
2002: No first rounder
2003: Zach Parise (17th overall)
2004: Travis Zajac (2oth overall)
2005: Niclas Bergfors (23rd overall)
2006: Matt Corrente (30th overall)

2/4 depending on how you view Travis Zajac.

NYI
2002: Sean Bergenheim (22nd overall)
2003: Robert Nilsson (15th overall)
2004: Petteri Nokelainen (16th overall)
2005: Ryan O'Mara (15th overall)
2006: Kyle Okposo (7th overall)

1/5. Okposo at 7th overall could be argued as being bad value though. Bergenheim had a decent career but wasn't more than a 3rd or 4th liner.

NYR
2002: None
2003: Hugh Jessiman (12th overall)
2004: Al Montoya (6th overall), Lauri Korpikoski (19th overall)
2005: Marc Staal (12th overall)
2006: Bobby Sanguinetti (21st overall)

1/5. Staal is the only good get. The rest are pretty bad overall

Philadelphia
2002: Joni Pitkanen (4th overall)
2003: Jeff Carter (11th overall), Mike Richards (24th overall)
2004: None
2005: Steve Downie (29th overall)
2006: Claude Giroux (22nd overall)

I'd say 3/5. The 2003 draft for sure saved them. Pitkanen's career will always be a what if considering all of his injuries.

Pittsburgh
2002: Ryan Whitney (5th overall)
2003: Fleury (1st overall)
2004: Malkin (2nd overall)
2005: Crosby (1st overall)
2006: Jordan Staal (2nd overall)

Top 5 picks every year. I'd give them 3/5 hits. Whitney wouldn't be a 5th overall pick if you redrafted the 2002 draft. Best thing he did was give them Chris Kunitz. You could maybe argue Fleury at 1st overall over Eric Staal could have been a miss. Staal/Malkin/Crosby back to back to back years would have been insane. Jordan Staal is a miss for me considering Toews, Backstrom and Kessel were drafted directly after him.

Washington over that span went 5 (Ovechkin, Backstrom, Semin, Green, Varlamov) for 10 over the course of those drafts judging by your logic of busts but they still had Eminger, Fehr and Gordon with 10+ NHL seasons over that span. That means that only Pittsburgh and Philadelphia had better success over those years but Pittsburgh also had all top 5 picks.
 

francaisvolantsparis

Registered User
Nov 21, 2018
1,540
568
Nice
Again, I don't think anyone is offended. But if you're wondering why people seem to have less patience with you it's more of the "drunk", "Holtby's mom", "toxic", "troll", "Do you understand?" etc. and less of your takes.


We've heard a lot of wild takes, most of the posters have been here for a very long time, that's not why people continue to prod at you. The thing that's creating this dynamic is what happens after you offer your opinion, the personal attacks, reluctance to provide follow up information, the condescension, etc.

Now you talk in behalf of everyone. You see what I say? You cannot imagine others have different point of view. You know why you do not accept the "do you understand?"? You do not what to understand or see something.
 

francaisvolantsparis

Registered User
Nov 21, 2018
1,540
568
Nice
Going back to just teams in our division's 1st round draft choices between 2002-2006:

Carolina
2002: Cam Ward (1st rounder, #25 overall)
2003: Eric Staal (2nd overall)
2004: Andrew Ladd (4th overall) - Ladd played less than 150 games before being shipped out
2005: Jack Johnson (3rd overall) - Jack Johnson never played a game for the organization
2006: No first rounder

Carolina was solid at identifying talent, but moved on early from 2 of their draft choices. Ladd at 4th overall also isn't great value. 2/4 hits for me considering Johnson at 3rd overall and Ladd at 4th wouldn't happen again in a redraft

Columbus
2002: Rick Nash (1st overall)
2003: Nikolai Zherdev (4th overall)
2004: Alexandre Picard (8th overall)
2005: Gilbert Brule (6th overall)
2006: Derek Brassard (6th overall)

1/5 or 2/5 depending on your feelings for Brassard. So pretty bad picks there

New Jersey
2002: No first rounder
2003: Zach Parise (17th overall)
2004: Travis Zajac (2oth overall)
2005: Niclas Bergfors (23rd overall)
2006: Matt Corrente (30th overall)

2/4 depending on how you view Travis Zajac.

NYI
2002: Sean Bergenheim (22nd overall)
2003: Robert Nilsson (15th overall)
2004: Petteri Nokelainen (16th overall)
2005: Ryan O'Mara (15th overall)
2006: Kyle Okposo (7th overall)

1/5. Okposo at 7th overall could be argued as being bad value though. Bergenheim had a decent career but wasn't more than a 3rd or 4th liner.

NYR
2002: None
2003: Hugh Jessiman (12th overall)
2004: Al Montoya (6th overall), Lauri Korpikoski (19th overall)
2005: Marc Staal (12th overall)
2006: Bobby Sanguinetti (21st overall)

1/5. Staal is the only good get. The rest are pretty bad overall

Philadelphia
2002: Joni Pitkanen (4th overall)
2003: Jeff Carter (11th overall), Mike Richards (24th overall)
2004: None
2005: Steve Downie (29th overall)
2006: Claude Giroux (22nd overall)

I'd say 3/5. The 2003 draft for sure saved them. Pitkanen's career will always be a what if considering all of his injuries.

Pittsburgh
2002: Ryan Whitney (5th overall)
2003: Fleury (1st overall)
2004: Malkin (2nd overall)
2005: Crosby (1st overall)
2006: Jordan Staal (2nd overall)

Top 5 picks every year. I'd give them 3/5 hits. Whitney wouldn't be a 5th overall pick if you redrafted the 2002 draft. Best thing he did was give them Chris Kunitz. You could maybe argue Fleury at 1st overall over Eric Staal could have been a miss. Staal/Malkin/Crosby back to back to back years would have been insane. Jordan Staal is a miss for me considering Toews, Backstrom and Kessel were drafted directly after him.

Washington over that span went 5 (Ovechkin, Backstrom, Semin, Green, Varlamov) for 10 over the course of those drafts judging by your logic of busts but they still had Eminger, Fehr and Gordon with 10+ NHL seasons over that span. That means that only Pittsburgh and Philadelphia had better success over those years but Pittsburgh also had all top 5 picks.
What team do you think wasted completely five or more first round picks in four years or less?
 

tenken00

Oh it's going down in Chinatown
Jan 29, 2010
9,939
10,198
I think the failed Jagr trade showed Ted you can’t buy a cup playing fantasy hockey trades.
He had to build a team from within with good drafts, prospect development, and coaching.

Yep, at that time, Leonsis was still a brand-spanking-new owner coming over an ownership change from Abe Pollin. The Caps as an organization was still figuring things out, as Ovies Wodka pointed out with the Jagr fail trade.

You can point blame to them for mistakes at team building during that time, yes. But they were learning the ropes still to be the organization they are now.

Hell, everything was different. I remember Ted Leonsis choking and throwing a fan to the ground during those early times. But again, you have to make mistakes in order to grow. As a player, as a team, and as a front office.
 

illicit

Registered User
Jul 28, 2011
285
289
Vancouver
@francaisvolantsparis, what exactly are you trying to argue here? Sure, the Caps have made bad draft picks, but so has every other team in the league. Like others have stated, the draft is a crap shoot. How many times have we seen 1st overall picks be busts? How many times have we seen late round picks blossom into star players? So yeah, if management had made better picks in the draft, the Capitals could have been a dynasty, but you could say the exact same thing about almost every team in the league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VaCaps Fan

g00n

Retired Global Mod
Nov 22, 2007
31,305
15,936
If you cannot imagine a better team, doesn't mean someone else cannot. I can Imagine us dominating the League with multiple Cups.

Can you provide examples of other teams that have done this in the salary cap era? Maybe the Pens and Hawks but how many of their players on those Cup teams were home grown? Plus the Pens had a ridiculous run of top 5 picks, while the Hawks used salary cap loopholes to stock their roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VaCaps Fan

hb13xchamps

Registered User
Dec 23, 2011
9,287
6,286
Pennsylvania
What team do you think wasted completely five or more first round picks in four years or less?
What team had that many f***ing first round picks? We were 5/10 by your logic. That’s 50% success rate. Only two teams in our own division drafted better.

Again, your hot take was dumb and now your moving the goal posts to support your argument. It’s stupid
 
  • Like
Reactions: itsjustsurvival

francaisvolantsparis

Registered User
Nov 21, 2018
1,540
568
Nice
@francaisvolantsparis, what exactly are you trying to argue here? Sure, the Caps have made bad draft picks, but so has every other team in the league. Like others have stated, the draft is a crap shoot. How many times have we seen 1st overall picks be busts? How many times have we seen late round picks blossom into star players? So yeah, if management had made better picks in the draft, the Capitals could have been a dynasty, but you could say the exact same thing about almost every team in the league.
2006
#4 Washington Capitals Nicklas Bäckström (F)ok
#23 Washington Capitals Semyon Varlamov (G)homerun
#34 Washington Capitals Michal Neuvirth (G)ok
#177 Washington Capitals Mathieu Perreault (F)homerun
2007
#5 Washington Capitals Karl Alzner (D) ok
2008
#21 Washington Capitals Anton Gustafsson (F)waste
#27 Washington Capitals John Carlson (D)homerun
#93 Washington Capitals Braden Holtby (G) homerun
2009
#24 Washington Capitals Marcus Johansson (F)homerun
#55 Washington Capitals Dmitri Orlov (D)homerun
#85 Washington Capitals Cody Eakin (F) homerun
2010
#26 Washington Capitals Yevgeni Kuznetsov (F)homerun
#112 Washington Capitals Philipp Grubauer (G) homerun
2011
#177 Washington Capitals Travis Boyd (F) homerun
2012
#11 Washington Capitals Filip Forsberg (F)homerun
#16 Washington Capitals Tom Wilson (F)homerun
#77 Washington Capitals Chandler Stephenson (F)homerun
#137 Washington Capitals Connor Carrick (D)homerun
#195 Washington Capitals Christian Djoos (D) homerun
2013
#23 Washington Capitals André Burakovsky (F)homerun
#53 Washington Capitals Madison Bowey (D)homerun
#61 Washington Capitals Zach Sanford (F) homerun
2014
#13 Washington Capitals Jakub Vrána (F) homerun
2015
#22 Washington Capitals Ilya Samsonov (G)homerun
#57 Washington Capitals Jonas Siegenthaler (D) ok
2016
#28 Washington Capitals Lucas Johansen (D) waste
2018
#31 Washington Capitals Alexander Alexeyev (D)ok
#46 Washington Capitals Martin Fehérváry (D) homerun
2019
#25 Washington Capitals Connor McMichael (F)homerun
#91 Washington Capitals Alexei Protas (F) homerun
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

In 14 years we wasted only 2 1st round picks. In four important rebuild years we wasted six.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad