There’s a good argument, it just seems to fit, feels organic…totally agree. But it didn’t start out that way. It’s clear DC didn’t seriously negotiate until it was almost too late. That is on them.alternatively...
Is this about the fact that the current arena for the last 25 years has been thoroughly and seamlessly incorporated into the city and the neighborhood, with tons of walkable things to do nearby, steps from Metro, less than 1/2 mile from The National Mall, with great support and has been suddenly yanked away (with no public oppty for comment) when apparently DC has made multiple offers to appease Ted
I think *that* is the issue
Ted could've negotiated a fine deal to stay and still be a big ol' Multi-Billionaire
note - I'm not really anti this deal and obv a new place will incorporate many good new ideas/new tech/blah blah and it's not a far move; for me it's not a Garth "we fear change" it's more of it felt organic and good and a "they did it right" having the arena in town and incorporated into the neighborhood
I bet all the food and bev places by Cap1 are bummed!
Also, here's a thought: At the rate Ovi is scoring, will he score 895 at the new arena?
hahahaha
They'll likely go out of business. They depend on the games for their existence. Its part of the cycle of commerce, no one is guaranteed a future. Some of them may be able to relocate to the new site, maybe.
It's gonna gut the whole area, which had gotten so vibrant pre-covid.They'll likely go out of business. They depend on the games for their existence. Its part of the cycle of commerce, no one is guaranteed a future. Some of them may be able to relocate to the new site, maybe.
It's gonna gut the whole area, which had gotten so vibrant pre-covid.
Ted sees recently built arenas and entertainment complexes, and wants to cash in. He wants people to eat, live, and play in Leonsis-land. I can't blame him. He's not getting that type of deal in DC. Look at Little Caesars Arena in Detroit. It's got a massive lower bowl, gondola luxury seating, and 4 VIP clubs, which would mean more money in his pocket. He's not getting that with the current situation. I think Capital One is a fine arena, but it certainly has its limitations. In the bill, it states that the lease would be extended until 2052 and that the Capitals and the Wizards would not be able to relocate outside the District until the end of the it. He doesn't want to be locked into a 55 year arena at that point, which would certainly be inadequate at that time. If he takes the DC deal, I'm sure there will be discussions again in 10-15 years about a new arena, but I'm not sure he gets this type of deal in DC in the future anyways.Couple thoughts:
The parking thing, obviously they will make accommodations for parking, but the desire would/should obviously be to funnel people to the public transportation anyway. It -should- be more convenient to take the Metro than to drive, not vice versa.
Second, if the team moved just 100 feet in any direction, some people would be unhappy about it. Its absolutely guaranteed that Ted fully understands where his season ticket holder base is located in great detail, and also where the casual ticket buyers tend to come from. Customer analytics is fundamental to decisions like this. Ted fully understand this move will anger some people, but likely will be healthier for the larger fan base over the long term. For both drivers and metro riders, if the move adds 30 minutes to your one way game commute, that will be a deal breaker for some, and just an inconvenience for others. But the rage and anger may be a little over the top about it. Ted knows he may lose some paying customers, but he's still doing this because the long term return will be worth it. For him, but likely for the larger portion of the fan base.
So says the guy living in California! LOLCouple thoughts:
The parking thing, obviously they will make accommodations for parking, but the desire would/should obviously be to funnel people to the public transportation anyway. It -should- be more convenient to take the Metro than to drive, not vice versa.
Second, if the team moved just 100 feet in any direction, some people would be unhappy about it. Its absolutely guaranteed that Ted fully understands where his season ticket holder base is located in great detail, and also where the casual ticket buyers tend to come from. Customer analytics is fundamental to decisions like this. Ted fully understand this move will anger some people, but likely will be healthier for the larger fan base over the long term. For both drivers and metro riders, if the move adds 30 minutes to your one way game commute, that will be a deal breaker for some, and just an inconvenience for others. But the rage and anger may be a little over the top about it. Ted knows he may lose some paying customers, but he's still doing this because the long term return will be worth it. For him, but likely for the larger portion of the fan base.
So says the guy living in California! LOL
And PS — I echo your sentiments — but I am also a Californian, now.
Ted sees recently built arenas and entertainment complexes, and wants to cash in. He wants people to eat, live, and play in Leonsis-land. I can't blame him. He's not getting that type of deal in DC. Look at Little Caesars Arena in Detroit. It's got a massive lower bowl, gondola luxury seating, and 4 VIP clubs, which would mean more money in his pocket. He's not getting that with the current situation. I think Capital One is a fine arena, but it certainly has its limitations. In the bill, it states that the lease would be extended until 2052 and that the Capitals and the Wizards would not be able to relocate outside the District until the end of the it. He doesn't want to be locked into a 55 year arena at that point, which would certainly be inadequate at that time. I'm sure there will be discussions again in 10-15 years about a new arena, but I'm not sure he gets this type of deal in DC in the future anyways.
On the flip side, maybe the football team somehow benefits from this in a move back to DC?
Speaking of.
It's a great way to gauge public interest in today's day and age. There's a reason so much money is pumped into it. I think it's pretty obvious that if over 100,000 people read a message and only 500 were like "heck yeah!" It's not being received very well.I assume you are a big believer in basing decisions on social media likes?
$6M... deal of the century!I would hope so too, but its probably wishful thinking at this point. JH isn't going to stick his $6M baby in a place that is in clear decline.
Even Abe's apparent philanthropic idea of moving the teams downtown in 1997 was more driven by cheap real estate costs.
Based on what? How many people ‘should’ like something to show it is well received?I think it's pretty obvious that if over 100,000 people read a message and only 500 were like "heck yeah!" It's not being received very well.
Man, how could Ted do this...