Far more value than a throw in to dump 2.5 in LTIR
Huh? It’s about gaining 3.5m in accumulating cap space for a much larger deal, or several, during the season.
Far more value than a throw in to dump 2.5 in LTIR
Which is asinine to use Hoglander for. You don’t handicap yourself at the start of the season to “maybe” upgrade at the deadlineHuh? It’s about gaining 3.5m in accumulating cap space for a much larger deal, or several, during the season.
I am absolutely hoping to see them bank as much space as possible so that they can turn this team into a complete f***ing monster with rentals. It's a risk chemistry and systems wise but Benning.Huh? It’s about gaining 3.5m in accumulating cap space for a much larger deal, or several, during the season.
he would be a nice injection to the powerplay unit 2. vancouver doesnt have another right handed shot besides boeser. so adding another shooter doesnt hurt. as for his defensive game, tocheet and the staff should help in that regards. i think he would be saddled with 2 defensive forwards example: petterson/suter
garland isnt a shooter. he just creates chances from his forechecking speed.i mean garland but
You do if you are trying to win the cup and dont think the current roster is enough.Which is asinine to use Hoglander for. You don’t handicap yourself at the start of the season to “maybe” upgrade at the deadline
PP1 DeBrusk Miller-Boeser-Pettersson Hughes | PP2 Garland Heinen-Sprong-Hoglander Hronek |
Debrusk is a more of an offensive guy who learned to play defense. Don't know much about Sprong, him being on so many teams in a short time in worrisome.
for one yearPodkolzin maybe, Hoglander absolutely not. Both are still more valuable then getting out of 2.5 LTIR
No you don’t. You do that if your management wants to throw away roster players for nothing.You do if you are trying to win the cup and dont think the current roster is enough.
Aman and PDG have to clear waivers but I think those are guys you don't mind risking. Lots of similar players on waivers every year and guys like Karlsson, Raty, Bains, Lek, Smith can replace them.Hmmm.
are people under the impression that if we get rid of Poolman we suddenly have a lot of cap space? This is juggling to meet the cap, and I am willing to bet that the second we go to Poolman on LTIR we will have little cap space left.
for that matter, how many players can we leave in limbo on the day we have to be cap compliant? Or do those that aren't part of the lineup have to clear waivers?
And as I asked before, is there any forward amongst the 14 listed who doesn't have to clear waivers? I don't think so. I think the only player who doesn't of the projected starting line up is Silvos.
Anyone? anyone? (Ferris Bueller reference).
for one year
Absolutely.No way does Sprong mean we should be trading any other fwds away. RT might permascratch him in week 2 of the season.
Just send down Aman or PDG or both during the great waiver flush to start the season. Great vets for Abby and won't have to reclear waivers as injury callups.
Good gamble/$ though. He could lead the league in pts/$ if it works out.
I hope we go into the season with Hog and Pod. I'm not ready to give up on them and both have far better long term potential and value than a guy like Sprong.
Both guys also play hard every shift. Hoglander and Garland were probably our two most consistent forwards last year.
He also played 4th line minutes on shitty teams even with his production... thst shows how flawed the rest of his game is.For a player that plays 4th line minutes, gets a ton of points.
So you just keep going forward with a roster that you believe isnt enough to win a cup?No you don’t. You do that if your management wants to throw away roster players for nothing.