i have updated this
Agreed but on paper, it really shouldn't have.Oh my, this aged poorly.
Agreed but on paper, it really shouldn't have.
Just goes to show terrible team chemistry and/or lockerroom rifts can kill a team.
2005-2006 Canucks and the 1997-1998 Canucks were also living proof.
How did anyone think this was a deep forward group.i have updated thisView attachment 598359
i have updated thisView attachment 598359
Agreed but on paper, it really shouldn't have.
Just goes to show terrible team chemistry and/or lockerroom rifts can kill a team.
2005-2006 Canucks and the 1997-1998 Canucks were also living proof.
Fair enough. If I see the OP at Rogers Arena one day, I'll knock his hat off his head (before buying him a beer or something :-p)It really should. The OP basically propped up every player by 10+ goals over what they likely score in order to conclude they're the deepest forward group in the league. It's almost guaranteed that a team is going to fall way under expectations if that's how you arrive at your expectations for a team.
Their defense is the reason they are losing though. Obviously the forwards haven’t been great but they are getting multi goal leads and the other team isn’t worried at all because they know theirs will come. The defense was horrendous coming in and is the biggest problem so farAgreed but on paper, it really shouldn't have.
Just goes to show terrible team chemistry and/or lockerroom rifts can kill a team.
2005-2006 Canucks and the 1997-1998 Canucks were also living proof.
I advocated that the Canucks trade for Chychrun or Seth Jones prior to the season starting so that we'd haveTheir defense is the reason they are losing though. Obviously the forwards haven’t been great but they are getting multi goal leads and the other team isn’t worried at all because they know theirs will come. The defense was horrendous coming in and is the biggest problem so far
I advocated that the Canucks trade for Chychrun or Seth Jones prior to the season starting so that we'd have
Hughes-Jones
OEL-Myers
or
Chychrun-Hughes
OEL-Myers
but it wasn't well received.
Agreed but on paper, it really shouldn't have.