Drij
Registered User
- Mar 5, 2007
- 7,327
- 348
This entire post is one of the most homer things I've read in a long time. It's also hilarious.I can’t really find any other team aside from St Louis and Colorado that has a more well rounded, balanced and potential threat line up than the Canucks.
Miller, Pettersson, Horvat, that’s 90-100 goals alone down the middle. I don’t think there’s any team with that type of scoring punch down the middle. Not to mention Boeser having a down year last season due to family reasons. He’s easily good for 25 goals on the wing.
Then you have another 25, potential 30 goal scorer in Mikheyev, 50+ playmaker in Garland, Podkolzin who will definitely build from last season potting perhaps another 20-20-40pts. That’s not even mentioning Kuzmenko who could very well be another Panarin type player. Even Pearson is good for 35-40 points including 15-20+ goals.
Demko is a top 5 goaltender in the league, and there’s Hughes and OEL (albeit overpaid) are 2 elite defenseman who make their partners much better than they are (Schenn and Myers).
With the amount of team defense this team has with the additions of Lazar, Mikheyev, Joshua, and even Dickinson, having that hole on the right side is manageable. Canucks were top 5 in the league in fewest even strength goals allowed with that atrocious right side, in large part thanks to OEL and his brains. PK was the main issue on defense but that should be improved.
I just can’t really think of a more well balanced group, especially the forward group, with an average age of 25 years old.
I can’t really find any other team aside from St Louis and Colorado that has a more well rounded, balanced and potential threat line up than the Canucks.
Miller, Pettersson, Horvat, that’s 90-100 goals alone down the middle. I don’t think there’s any team with that type of scoring punch down the middle. Not to mention Boeser having a down year last season due to family reasons. He’s easily good for 25 goals on the wing.
Then you have another 25, potential 30 goal scorer in Mikheyev, 50+ playmaker in Garland, Podkolzin who will definitely build from last season potting perhaps another 20-20-40pts. That’s not even mentioning Kuzmenko who could very well be another Panarin type player. Even Pearson is good for 35-40 points including 15-20+ goals.
Demko is a top 5 goaltender in the league, and there’s Hughes and OEL (albeit overpaid) are 2 elite defenseman who make their partners much better than they are (Schenn and Myers).
With the amount of team defense this team has with the additions of Lazar, Mikheyev, Joshua, and even Dickinson, having that hole on the right side is manageable. Canucks were top 5 in the league in fewest even strength goals allowed with that atrocious right side, in large part thanks to OEL and his brains. PK was the main issue on defense but that should be improved.
I just can’t really think of a more well balanced group, especially the forward group, with an average age of 25 years old.
I'd hesitate to use the term age, it was so quickly turned on its head.this didn't age well lol
To be fair, we’re only 0-4-2, we still have 76 more games.
12 came from the super deep offensive threat.39 shots vs 16 yesterday .... ouch !
I can’t really find any other team aside from St Louis and Colorado that has a more well rounded, balanced and potential threat line up than the Canucks.
Miller, Pettersson, Horvat, that’s 90-100 goals alone down the middle. I don’t think there’s any team with that type of scoring punch down the middle. Not to mention Boeser having a down year last season due to family reasons. He’s easily good for 25 goals on the wing.
Then you have another 25, potential 30 goal scorer in Mikheyev, 50+ playmaker in Garland, Podkolzin who will definitely build from last season potting perhaps another 20-20-40pts. That’s not even mentioning Kuzmenko who could very well be another Panarin type player. Even Pearson is good for 35-40 points including 15-20+ goals.
Demko is a top 5 goaltender in the league, and there’s Hughes and OEL (albeit overpaid) are 2 elite defenseman who make their partners much better than they are (Schenn and Myers).
With the amount of team defense this team has with the additions of Lazar, Mikheyev, Joshua, and even Dickinson, having that hole on the right side is manageable. Canucks were top 5 in the league in fewest even strength goals allowed with that atrocious right side, in large part thanks to OEL and his brains. PK was the main issue on defense but that should be improved.
I just can’t really think of a more well balanced group, especially the forward group, with an average age of 25 years old.
Canucks quietly rely heavily on Hughes to keep themselves afloat.39 shots vs 16 yesterday .... ouch !
I mean, its deep if absolutely everything goes right, which almost never happens. And by that measure, its not that deep compared to other teams.
I mean the thread starter said Mikheyev was good for 25-30 goals.
That's outrageous.
They were 0-4-2 without him. What a difference makerCanucks quietly rely heavily on Hughes to keep themselves afloat.
The group has good players (and yes, the forward group is very deep), but they've shown on numerous occasions that:This thread didn't slip quietly, that's for sure.
I don't understand how Rutherford, Boudreau and the players are already bluffing at each other not even 10 games into the season. I mean.. HOW?!
Underrated comment. I don't think most realize you are the OP but this was a well done reply to dig your heels in.To be fair, we’re only 0-4-2, we still have 76 more games.