Peen
Rejoicing in a Benning-free world
- Oct 6, 2013
- 31,634
- 27,977
Please no Podkolzin in the deal. Pls.
Neither would be great.The guy I am praying we do not include is Hoglander.
Is that even allowed?Canucks now have 6 All-stars. Might as well call us the 80's Oilers
Honestly I don't want either moved, because they are perfectly primed to step in and fill out the roster with cheap, quality depth next season and this post season.The guy I am praying we do not include is Hoglander.
Same. Podz would hurt, but he still hasn't really proved anything at the NHL. Hoglander is breaking out before our eyes and I want to have him evolve in a Canucks jersey.The guy I am praying we do not include is Hoglander.
It just doesn't make sense cap-wise to give up the one cheap cost-controlled player signed through this year and next so I doubt it.The guy I am praying we do not include is Hoglander.
we need Adam Larsson out of SeattleWe are about to become the anti-Oilers team
So like
Does he wear the flames jerseys at the ASG
Want just a little bit more detail before making a thread. Another player, stronger confirmation, anything really.
Maybe they want a d man ..Hirose,Brz..?If it's Kuz and the 1st, I really wouldn't be happy with a prospect higher than Karlsson being the add. Too rich for Lindholm, though he definitely would offer second line flexibility.
Pagnotta is questionable but it’d be hilarious if Kuzy just says no
I totally understand Calgary being on his no trade list. If Hoglander is part of the deal, and Kuz kills it because of the NTC, I will be happy.Well there it is. Thread up in a minute.
Pagnotta is questionable but it’d be hilarious if Kuzy just says no
Pagnotta is questionable but it’d be hilarious if Kuzy just says no
I say wait longer, what if Kuz says no to CalgaryWell there it is. Thread up in a minute.