Canucks News, Rumours, & Fantasy GM | The Russians are Going!?

Status
Not open for further replies.

sandwichbird2023

Registered User
Aug 4, 2004
4,083
2,229


I guess I'll post it here for comparison's sake.

This is exactly what I predicted, other teams like the Jets (and potentially Avs, Bruins, etc down the road) get desperate for a 2C and pay a high price for an inferior player to Lindholm. We traded a slightly worse 1st round pick, but got Lindholm over Monahan (not insignificant upgrade). The only difference is we traded a B-level prospect in Bruz for that upgrade and to remove $5.5m salary for this season and next. I think, relative to the Jets, we got the better deal.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,774
17,285
Victoria
If Guentzel is available at TDL - I would be all in like Lindholm - he’s my target, putting Mikheyev in the package and then a separate depth defencemen trade and be done.

If he’s not - I look for bottom 6 upgrade to push Aman in a depth role and a defence upgrade. Perhaps maybe look for another tweener up front for cheap if it makes sense/available.

Also, unfortunately Tanev is going to have to wait for offseason to come here.

I think that would be my strategy towards TDL.
I think their big ticket items are done, and Allvin/JR pretty much said so..

Another depth defensemen (give us Kovacevic!) and forward to push Aman might be the only things that shake loose now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andora

SeawaterOnIce

Bald is back in style.
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2011
18,085
22,867
Problem is all of Colorado's defencemen, except for Makar, have taken a step back. Same people but they are all playing slightly worse. Vegas and Dallas have good defence, and I'm not saying every contender is comparable to the Canucks, but the rest of the league looks about on par with one super star leading the way and a bunch of supporting pieces with warts.
It's no coincidence they took a step back after losing Landeskog and Kadri who absorbed some tough heavy minutes up front.

Also Drouin, Colton, Wood, Ryan Johansen are massive downgrades from Landkeskog, Kadri, Burakovsky, Nichushkin (unknown if he will be back before seasons end).
 

pitseleh

Registered User
Jul 30, 2005
19,409
3,555
Vancouver
Problem is all of Colorado's defencemen, except for Makar, have taken a step back. Same people but they are all playing slightly worse. Vegas and Dallas have good defence, and I'm not saying every contender is comparable to the Canucks, but the rest of the league looks about on par with one super star leading the way and a bunch of supporting pieces with warts.

That may be but I’d still take any of them (ignoring contracts) over what the Canucks have.

Out of the East, only Florida is as weak as the Canucks currently are. All of Boston, New York, and Carolina have second pairings that are miles better than the Canucks’.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vancityluongo

thecupismine

Registered User
Apr 1, 2007
2,711
2,117
If anyone thought the price for Lindholm was steep, I would suggest they look at this Monahan deal. The gap between the deals is Hunter, and if you assign any value to Kuzmenko beyond his cap dump status.

When you're in your window, you absolutely give up the B prospect for the difference between the two. One is commiting to Derek Roy in 2012, the other is getting a 2014 Ryan Kesler who may or may not rebound to their previous form. I know which one I'd rather have.
 

Izzy Goodenough

Registered User
Oct 11, 2020
2,816
2,689
Interesting, either the Canucks or the Jets or more likely neither, win these bets this year.

Resigning either makes new wagers for subsequent years.
 

sandwichbird2023

Registered User
Aug 4, 2004
4,083
2,229
This massively undersells the difference. Soucy would have been playing bottom pairing minutes on all of those teams but is this team’s third best defender. Guys like Cernak, McDonough, Bouwmeester, and Byram were all playing like 2/3 defenders when their teams won the cup.

Vegas is closer, and I can seem more room for disagreement, but I’d take any of their 3-6 defenders over any of this team’s 3-6 defenders for a single playoff run.

Can you win with a defence like this team’s? Yes. But it would be a ~25%ile or worse defence in the last 20-25 years and is definitely the weakest point on this team right now.
Looking at lineup on dailyfaceoff.com, I don't think we are significantly worse than any of the other cup contenders.

Avs: Makar, Toews, Girard, Manson, Byram, Malinski, Jack Johnson
Canes: Slavin, Burns, Skjei, Pesce, Orlov, Chatfield
Stars: Heiskanen, Harley, Lindell, Hakanpaa, Suter, Lundkvist
Oilers: Ekholm, Bouchard, Nurse, Ceci, Kulak, Desharnais
Panthers: Forsling, Ekblad, Mikkola, Montour, OEL, Kulikov
Rangers: Fox, Miller, Trouba, Lindgren, Schneider, Gustafsson
Lightning: Hedman, Sergachev, Cernak, Raddysh, Perbix, De Haan
Knights: Pietrangelo, Theodore, Martinez, McNabb, Whitecloud, Hague
Jets: Morrissey, Demelo, Pionk, Dillon, Schmidt, Samberg

Canucks: Hughes, Hronek, Soucy, Cole, Myers, Zadorov, Juulsen

Aside from the Canes and maybe the Knights, I don't think we match up too badly with any other team. Our top 2 of Hughes/Hronek is better than any duo except for maybe the Avs. Some teams might have a better #3 than us, but our #4-6 of Zadorov/Cole/Myers is better than most of the other teams #4-6. That also doesn't take into account that some of the other team's players are playing below their expected level this season, so while their roster might look better on paper, they are not performing as well as expected.

In a capped league, every team is going to have holes. Sure one or two injuries on the blueline can sink us, but you can say that for every other team as well. Luck plays a big part in winning a cup. I don't think many teams have a deeper blueline than the 2011 Canucks (arguably 5 top pairing D plus a very good Tanev ready to step in), yet even they aren't deep enough if you run into extreme bad luck.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
28,066
48,065
Junktown
That may be but I’d still take any of them (ignoring contracts) over what the Canucks have.

Out of the East, only Florida is as weak as the Canucks currently are. All of Boston, New York, and Carolina have second pairings that are miles better than the Canucks’.

Rangers defence, like the Avalanche, just isn't as good as advertised. Trouba is increasingly a liability, Schneider hasn't taken a step forward, and Lindgren is always injured. At least that's what I've read and seen in my limited viewings. Hurricanes defence has taken a step back as well. They're probably both better than the Canucks group but I don't think the second pairings are miles better anymore.

I'll leave a lot of room for my evaluations to be based on older information and several players have now rounded into form.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andora

Coffee

Take one step towards the direction you want to go
Nov 12, 2021
9,284
8,167
When copying and pasting a Twitter post in, delete the "x" in the URL and write in "twitter" in its place. This MUST be done before you hit post, it won't work if you try to edit it after the fact. This is how you embed the Twitter post into your post.
THANK YOU
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Canucklehead

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
8,218
13,998
Vancouver
Kovacevic is someone I want. Ticks a lot of boxes and there's no risk attached given his contract.
Kovacevic and Pezzetta for Raty, Aman, and a 4th.

Kovacevic is intriguing for sure. Could be a Myers level replacement next year with the way he’s playing for Montreal.
 

Tact

Registered User
Jul 9, 2006
2,877
1,831
I think their big ticket items are done, and Allvin/JR pretty much said so..

Another depth defensemen (give us Kovacevic!) and forward to push Aman might be the only things that shake loose now.
He said it is likely their big ticket item is done - that’s probably them assuming Guentzel will be re-signed.

Who knows what happens if he becomes available? JR and PA definitely keeps us on our toes when it comes to trades.
 

Jerry the great

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2022
1,029
1,045

Kovacevic and Pezzetta for Raty, Aman, and a 4th.

Kovacevic is intriguing for sure. Could be a Myers level replacement next year with the way he’s playing for Montreal.
I would not be super keen on trading Aman. Cheap for two more years, good system guy that has flashed some skill and plays well with Hoglander. he really just needs to get bigger and stronger.
 

TruGr1t

Proper Villain
Jun 26, 2003
24,778
9,476
Monahan is a better puck distributor than Lindholm, but benchmarks way lower almost everywhere else (EV D, finishing, etc). Except on the PK, where he's been more effective, though in about half the short-handed minutes. His quality of competition to generate those results has also been way lower than Lindholm's.

Not that it needs to be said, but you're looking at a 1st/2nd liner versus a 2nd/3rd liner here.

Only reason Monahan may have been somewhat interesting for Vancouver is he could have been possibly extended on an affordable, short-term deal, where Lindholm is obviously going to be expensive.

On a cost-for-cost basis, Lindholm all day for the Canucks.
 

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
8,218
13,998
Vancouver
I would not be super keen on trading Aman. Cheap for two more years, good system guy that has flashed some skill and plays well with Hoglander. he really just needs to get bigger and stronger.
I really don’t see much upside to Aman.

If you can use him as a trading chip for a much more physical and versatile winger that’s equal in value + contract, you do that. He’s not particularly strong down the middle despite being a center and though he provides good energy as a winger, again, I’d much rather have a physical presence there that can skate as well as him. It adds more of a different dynamic to our bottom 6.
 

pitseleh

Registered User
Jul 30, 2005
19,409
3,555
Vancouver
Rangers defence, like the Avalanche, just isn't as good as advertised. Trouba is increasingly a liability, Schneider hasn't taken a step forward, and Lindgren is always injured. At least that's what I've read and seen in my limited viewings. Hurricanes defence has taken a step back as well. They're probably both better than the Canucks group but I don't think the second pairings are miles better anymore.

I'll leave a lot of room for my evaluations to be based on older information and several players have now rounded into form.

That’s fair on the Rangers - they’re closer to the Canucks than most.

But I’d disagree on the Hurricanes. I think they’re a team where bad goaltending is being interpreted as the defence regressing. Their defensive numbers are just as excellent as they have been for a few season. They have five defencemen who would be this team’s second or third best.

Conversely this team has gotten poor results when Hughes/Hronek haven’t been on the ice that’s been papered over by Demko being unreal.

If the Canucks could swap whoever you think is the third best of their non-Hughes/Hronek defencemen for this year’s playoff run for Trouba, Byram, Pesce, etc. I’d think you’d be nuts to turn it down.
 

Wisp

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
7,679
2,332
Habs should send Canucks a big thank you card. Montreal never gets that if not for Allvin and Rutherford sending the market into a panic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oceanchild

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
40,042
25,826
Vancouver, BC
You have to think that Allvin and co looked at matching up against Edmonton and Colorado in the playoffs and wanted more options against McDavid and MacKinnon.
Plus an improved PK and faceoff center to help against two great power plays.
This move really gives Tocchet a lot more options. A Lindholm, EP, and Mikheyev line could be a top defensive line while also providing offense and would also allow Tocchet to load up the Lotto line when trailing.
A second line of Kuzmenko, EP and Mikheyev would really hurt the matchup game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baby Pettersson
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad