If I'm not mistaken, he was riding the pine in the 3rd.Kuzmenko in the dog house?
One at least has to go. And one of Boeser/Garland. We cannot go forward with anymore than 2 out of those 4 contracts, and ideally 3 are gone, with the idealist ideality being OEL and Myers and Boeser moved.Tyler Myers is basically a 2012-2014 version of Andrew Alberts. Tall, lugs himself around the ice, late to react or see plays develop and struggles to make sensible decisions with the puck. A bottom pairing dman that should see 10-12min of ice time
Issue is he takes up 6 mil of cap space.
OEL is cooked as f***.
It's amazing watching two college players come up, and play better in their first games than these long-timers. Just shows how washed up OEL and Myers are.
We are heading towards disaster again in 2023-24 if both are playing above 17min a night.
The absolute bullshit thing is when Kuz first showed up the literal quotes from the top were “if youre a 40 goal scorer you can do this stuff, he has to earn it” and hes literally a 40 goal scorerThe treatment of Kuznetsov vs. Boeser is either :
a) Sensibly trying to build improvements in one player while trying to pump/dump the other.
or
b) The most unfair shit in the history of sports.
One at least has to go. And one of Boeser/Garland. We cannot go forward with anymore than 2 out of those 4 contracts, and ideally 3 are gone, with the idealist ideality being OEL and Myers and Boeser moved.
I’m far from convinced that OEL can still play meaningful minutes. Maybe a bottom pairing guy, who would be one of the highest paid players on the team.I've heard this sentiment a lot but I'm not so sure it is a necessity to move all of these players.
For instance, simply moving Myers alone for space could leave us with a bit over 8 million to add a 3C and RD for Hughes.
You could potentially field something like:
Kuzmenko-Pettersson-Mikeyev
Podkolzin-Miller-Boeser
[email protected]
Di Giuseppe-Aman-Joshua
[email protected]
OEL-Hronek
Hirose-Burroughs
I think people might be underrating the possibility that we could actually keep all 3 of Garland, Boeser and Beauvillier. I'm no historian but I seem to recall Rutherford being rather stingy in allocating cap to defense in past stops.
Management and coaching has spoken as if Boeser will be back and its a big offseason for him. It's hard to deny how good Garland looks on the 3rd in this system.
Looking at Minnesota who is able to compete even with the onerous Parise and Suter buyout penalties Vancouver should probably just bite the bullet and buy him out. Then ideally move Myers likely with some retention and then Boeser or Garland and try to add two D for next year.I’m far from convinced that OEL can still play meaningful minutes. Maybe a bottom pairing guy, who would be one of the highest paid players on the team.
I'm not unconvinced that a 'healthy' OEL can play meaningful minutes..I'd say he's been injured about 75% of the time he's been a Canuck..Clearly, he's injury prone.I’m far from convinced that OEL can still play meaningful minutes. Maybe a bottom pairing guy, who would be one of the highest paid players on the team.
If they sign Gavrikov - and that’s an if - OEL would be bottom pairing. But I’m not sure that makes sense. If we are investing big money into the defence, we still need a top pairing RD. My preference would be OEL and Myers gone, a new RD and a new LD (like Gavrikov) brought in, with a cheaper bottom pairing. But that would take a lot of things breaking right.I'm not unconvinced that a 'healthy' OEL can play meaningful minutes..I'd say he's been injured about 75% of the time he's been a Canuck..Clearly, he's injury prone.
He's going to be penciled in on that 2nd pairing with Hronek next season..undoubtably..
He's not getting bought out.
I mean what message is out there nowadays then if this is something that could tune guys outI see IMac on Twitter with an Tocchet interview, where the coach hints that the Canucks have been too comfortable with 'losing'. He says that its 'winning' that's hard.....not losing.
Wow! Tocchet with no hesitation in taking the stick to his floundering club. But makes you wonder if the approach will eventually wear out its welcome, and the players will start tuning out.
i still question whether tocchet knows how to coach this roster to wins. he wants to play an aggressive forechecking game when the canucks are one of if not the worst forechecking team in the league. he's already tried to turn joshua and beauvillier into forecheckers with little success. i guess he'll try garland next?
I don’t know. I see a stubborn and rigid coach who doesn’t utilize his roster in a way that plays to their strengths. Dump and chase seems stupid when you have possession players.Well I'd expect the roster will be shaped in Tocchet's image going forward. As long ago as Benning seems, this is the first offseason that the new GM has had his chosen coach in place.
Mikheyev and Podkolzin are also part of that answer. Next season, both should be two of our better forecheckers.
You ain’t getting squat for Dermott….or Dries.Myers for Kassian
Boeser 1.5m retained for 2nd+prospect
Dermott for 4th
Bear for 4th
Dries for 7th
Mayfield 4 x 4
Burroughs 900k x 2
Kuz-EP-Mikheyev
Garland-Miller-PDG
Podkolzin-Aman-Beauvillier
Joshua-Kravtsov-Hoglander
Kassian/Studnicka
Hughes-Mayfield
Hirose-Hronek
OEL-McWard
Wolanin-Burroughs
Demko
Silovs