Starting your argument with fan fiction is pretty laughable.
Second point dismantles your argument further.
Danault has never been the quality center lindholm is currently, lindholm is younger, has also been is selke talks, always been much better offensively, danault is LHS and signed like FOUR years ago.
If you think the settled in playoff version of lindholm isn't worth 7m in todays increased cap then I'm sorry but that's an incorrect assessment.
Allvins joshua, zadorov, and Lindholm rumored contracts have been bang on, only question if its enough, not if they're overpays.
Suggestions of 5.5 for lindholm are taj level bad and just not reality in todays nhl economic climate
We literally have mikhayev and Garland at Five Million, kuz got kicked to the curb in 3 seconds for 5.5, because defense.
Horvat makes 8.5.
Dubois makes 8.5.
Now we have the swedish right shot ~selke defense penalty kill Center version of kuz and people dont want to pay him ONE and a HALF million more, during our window?!?!
Idk what to say to you if you think a top ufa rhs C, several teams are looking at as a possible 1C, career borderline 1C, isnt worth 2m more than mik and garly, because of like twenty five regular season games after he was just traded, its a bad take imo.
Lastly, list off all the things Nuckles did, plus the several others you can think of (rhs,pk1,pp1,[there's more]) and then tell me who and how this contending team replaces all that by next season for less than 7M, all via trade and ufa with 30 other teams as options...
The lindholm is avg/bad and isn't worth 7M argument is lazy, weak at best and easily defeated, I'm tired and not particularly articulate and I just did it. Don't @ me I'm done, someone smarter than me could easily make an even better case.
I guess all the media rumours are fan fiction but your opinion, one several other Canucks even disagree with, isn't?
You do realize Danault has also been in selke talks despite still being severely underrated, yes? As for offensive numbers. Funny you am to "dismantle" my argument yet didn't bother to look up Danault outscored Lindholm this season. Last year they were merely four goals apart. Yes, Lindholm missed seven games but they haven't been far apart in production since 2021-22 when Lindholm had that one flash-in-pan season he's not come close to replicating since.
Regardless, I never said he wasn't worth 7M. I said he wasn't worth
more. I also qualified that statement around our situation, i.e. paying
7M+ for a third line center is ridiculous. One of Pettersson, Miller or Lindholm himself would need to convert to being a full time winger.
Please point to where I mentioned 5.5M for Lindholm. I'll wait. I compared him to Danault in the sense of paying less for a player like him would better fit our cap situation not that Lindholm is worth the same. You're inferring something I didn't say to make your argument.
Funny, Horvat at 8.5 is something a LOT of people here wanted very little part of. Hell, even Islander fans aren't thrilled with it, And Dubois is quite possibly the best example in the last two decades as to why you
shouldn't overpay UFAs. Granted, I don't expect Lindholm to ever play anywhere near that poorly even when he's 35.
You really ought to actually read some of these arguments before blowing up on people. Most who are gun-shy about re-signing Lindholm are worried they'll try to run three lines again when we simply don't have the depth to do, especially when we're trying to upgrade on the wing. Or they're afraid his playoff performance won't transition into the regular season
You can keep calling him a "borderline 1C" all you want. That doesn't make it accurate. He wasn't that good for us until near the end of the season and into the playoffs.
Keep in mind, I like the guy and wouldn't mind bringing him back. But like I said, if he rejected 7x7M, we're basically done. I'd rather have someone like Danault who may be a step down but is significantly cheaper.