Sabres also weren't willing to take back or retain salary plus their were health issues. Not saying they will get that price but circumstances are different. If Canucks are willing to take money back. Taking on someone like Erik Johnson's salary or retain Horvat's salary I could see them getting two blue chip prospects back.
1) Nolan Foote is not a dman. He’s a forward.Lol your missing the point. I just used the sens as a comparison.
my point is Barron is not some blue chip prospect. Lots of teams have similar prospects.
when Foote was trade for Coleman he was the same tier as Barron. Recent first round pick d.
Horvat is much better than Coleman.
Use some common sense. A late first and a recent first round d is not some enticing offer that you think it is
The only other way I see Horvat getting traded is if its a "hockey trade"
Horvat for Dobson kinda deal.
Is he a 2nd line centre on a Cup-calibre team? Or a third line centre?
This is crazy that the canucks are going to trade a good player instead of simply getting rid of Green
Easily 2nd line centre! If he’s your 3rd then that would be insane depth (and cap space)!!Is he a 2nd line centre on a Cup-calibre team? Or a third line centre?
Miller is our best forward right now. Horvat needs a change of scenery and would still garner a good return. To change the culture, they need to change the leadership up and down the organization; captain, coach, GM, new president, keep FA away from day to day ops....Canucks would be wiser to trade Miller, who is older, having a great year so far, and would be worth...well, maybe not more, but they would be selling high on him. They would be selling low on Horvat. If he has checked out and is unlikely to re-sign, then they might have to do it, though. seems like if the rot is that deep in the club then at the very least they have to look at firing the coach.
Eichel was bit broken.If Eichel didn't cost two blue chippers, neither does Horvat.
I hope it's true and we move on and get a big return. He's a captain who has lost the room and has no answers for the media. Give the C to Miller and move Horvat for futures.
Eh, I don't really agree on a few fronts. Newhook is a top prospect, but Barron isn't the same category. Good prospect, recent first rounder whose stock certainly has not gone down, but he's not a "blue chipper" like Newhook and certainly not Byram (although we may be arguing the semantics of what blue chip means here).
I do think Horvat is worth a Newhook and Barron if he's moved. As I see it he's a clear #2 center good for about 60 points a year who's quite affordable for the next two seasons at 5.5. To be clear, given the Avs' cap constrains and how Sakic operates I don't think there's any chance Sakic moves Newhook for someone with only 1.5 years of team control. But I think Horvat gets a top return if he's moved.
Of course, I also thought Eichel was going to get at least one more Barron-calibre piece in return and the Sabres botched that...so what do I know.
I speak for myself here… but I think us Canuck fans are so tired of “rebuilding/retooling” that anything less than a great return seems pointless. Nor do we trust our management.Overselling the shit out of Horvat here - no surprise there. Stud my ass.
He's 2nd line center. He isn't some stud. Also by the sounds of it, he might be getting isolated in the locker room. Not much of a leader either.I speak for myself here… but I think us Canuck fans are so tired of “rebuilding/retooling” that anything less than a great return seems pointless. Nor do we trust our management.
Horvat, playing at his usual level (i.e. don't judge this tire fire season where the players have quit), is a 1B/2B-level center. Unless that Cup caliber team has a Malkin-like 2nd line center, Horvat is more than capable of filling that role on a contender. He's basically a B. Schenn-level center and the Blues just won a Cup with him.Is he a 2nd line centre on a Cup-calibre team? Or a third line centre?