- Oct 31, 2007
- 40,243
- 45,652
Yep, gotta trade Peters now
Is this post serious?
(If it is: Khudobin has been back for two games. Two games. Peters was the best goaltender in the league for a period of two months. I don't want to trade Khudobin, either, but give Peters some respect.)
Is this post serious?
(If it is: Khudobin has been back for two games. Two games. Peters was the best goaltender in the league for a period of two months. I don't want to trade Khudobin, either, but give Peters some respect.)
Peters was nowhere near "the best goaltender in the league" for any amount of time and especially nowhere near 2 months.
Peters was solid for a while. I don't think anyone is denying that. But there was always that thought in the back of the mind that he would revert back to being...well...Peters. Which he may or may not have done with his last couple games.
Peters had a 2.33 GAA and a .933 save percentage in November.
Peters had a 1.38 GAA and .951 save percentage in December.
Could you please list me the goaltenders who performed better in both (2) months and tell me how that doesn't qualify him as one of the best goaltenders in the league for that time?
Have we already forgotten this after less than a month? I agree that we shouldn't trade Khudobin, but Peters played great for us, and if he wasn't already a goat around here he would get more respect for his play. It sucks to see him basically already being forgotten even though his play hasn't declined, while Khudobin has played 2 games (2.50 GAA) and is being heralded.
I think Peters might (/would probably) regress too, but I think he's earned the opportunity to do that before we christen someone else the starter.
It is not worth my time to pour over stats to refute your ridiculous statement which was he was the BEST goaltender in the league for 2 months which you have now changed to one of the best.
From your post earlier complaining why he wasn't starting I am beginning to hink maybe you are his girlfriend.
And his last couple of starts - his play had declined.
why do you cite peters' sv% but khudobin's GAA while facing 40 shots in each game? i guess khudobin's 2.5GAA helps boster your case more than his .938sv%
Too many people invested too much time and effort bagging his play over the years when he was called up, and refuse to acknowledge that he's improved his game by a good measure. They can't let go. Bad rebounds are given up by every goalie but are ignored because Peters wears that badge, so every time he gives one up it's a face palm moment whether the other team has exploited it or not.