Can Connor McDavid break up the "big 4"?

VanIslander

20 years of All-Time Drafts on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
36,135
6,829
South Korea
McD is behind Hasek, hence behind the Big 4.
So. ... sell 6th... Harvey, Bourque, Richard, Roy, etc are in your room. A GREAT place to be!
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,453
6,197
Visit site
While acknowledging that McDavid is pacing for a higher career value than Crosby thru 9 seasons but likely doesn't break up the Big 4, I will say that:

Crosby's '08 SCF is similar to McDavid's SCF and is arguably the better comparable given they were both in losing efforts in their first SCFs.

Crosby's 2009 run through three rounds is comparable to McDavid's 2022 run. This may be unfair to not include Crosby's 2009 SCF but it is also unfair to assume what McDavid does if he played in the SCF that year. And Crosby's point totals do not reflect his level of play in the 2009 SCF; most notably in Game 1 and 2 of the SCF; something that is brought up when McDavid's SCF is broken down game by game.

As much as Crosby underwhelmed in the playoffs during his peak, he overwhelmed at age 20-22 and added perhaps his best pound for pound run in 2018 at age 30. His 2016 and 2017 Cup wins confirmed his status as his era's best player.
 

Nathaniel Skywalker

DIG IN!!! RiGHT NOW!!!
Oct 18, 2013
14,204
5,848
This is such malarkey and would be one thing if his play and stats was mere ordinary in the playoffs but he had 40+ points and still drove play in games 6 and 7 so the narrow misplaced focus should be objectively compared to what he did as an individual not some arbitrary team thing.

And sure winning matters but in any all time ranking individual performance matters a hell of a lot more.
Lol. You really think he breaks the top 4 without a cup. Name one single top 4 player in any sport that matters without a championship. And yes mcdavid didnt drive shart the last 2 games and played the worst game of his career in game 7.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sentinel

GreatGonzo

Registered User
May 26, 2011
9,387
3,466
South Of the Tank
While acknowledging that McDavid is pacing for a higher career value than Crosby thru 9 seasons but likely doesn't break up the Big 4, I will say that:

Crosby's '08 SCF is similar to McDavid's SCF and is arguably the better comparable given they were both in losing efforts in their first SCFs.

Crosby's 2009 run through three rounds is comparable to McDavid's 2022 run. This may be unfair to not include Crosby's 2009 SCF but it is also unfair to assume what McDavid does if he played in the SCF that year. And Crosby's point totals do not reflect his level of play in the 2009 SCF; most notably in Game 1 and 2 of the SCF; something that is brought up when McDavid's SCF is broken down game by game.

As much as Crosby underwhelmed in the playoffs during his peak, he overwhelmed at age 20-22 and added perhaps his best pound for pound run in 2018 at age 30. His 2016 and 2017 Cup wins confirmed his status as his era's best player.
So Crosbys 3 points in 7 games shouldn’t reflect his overall performance that playoff run even though he went scoreless in 5/7 games including games 6 and 7, while being a non factor in game 7…..BUT, McDavids 11 points in 7 games reflects that he can’t handle the “big stage,” isn’t a great leader, and can’t get his team to a championship basically single handily….

:popcorn:

would love to hear how 19 points in 24 games
with a -2 confirms this. Especially considering the storm that would hit this place if McDavid put up those numbers, and how you would be one of the first to point it out.

Lol. You really think he breaks the top 4 without a cup. Name one single top 4 player in any sport that matters without a championship. And yes mcdavid didnt drive shart the last 2 games and played the worst game of his career in game 7.
You clearly didn’t watch game 7. Remind me how Crosby did in game 7 in ‘09….
 

Nathaniel Skywalker

DIG IN!!! RiGHT NOW!!!
Oct 18, 2013
14,204
5,848
So Crosbys 3 points in 7 games shouldn’t reflect his overall performance that playoff run even though he went scoreless in 5/7 games including games 6 and 7, while being a non factor in game 7…..BUT, McDavids 11 points in 7 games reflects that he can’t handle the “big stage,” isn’t a great leader, and can’t get his team to a championship basically single handily….

:popcorn:

would love to hear how 19 points in 24 games
with a -2 confirms this. Especially considering the storm that would hit this place if McDavid put up those numbers, and how you would be one of the first to point it out.


You clearly didn’t watch game 7. Remind me how Crosby did in game 7 in ‘09….
Im not talking about crosby. Im talking about the top 4 players. Im comparing mcdavid to them
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,365
16,721
Im not talking about crosby. Im talking about the top 4 players. Im comparing mcdavid to them

That's a valid point tbh.

McDavid just had one of the greatest playoff runs of all time.

But Lemieux/Gretzky etc probably would have stepped up in game 7.

When you're compared to those 4 - nitpicking and criticizing things like that is fair game.

Hopefully McDavid gets another shot soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nathaniel Skywalker

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
14,328
11,193
Crosby's 2009 run through three rounds is comparable to McDavid's 2022 run. This may be unfair to not include Crosby's 2009 SCF but it is also unfair to assume what McDavid does if he played in the SCF that year. And Crosby's point totals do not reflect his level of play in the 2009 SCF; most notably in Game 1 and 2 of the SCF; something that is brought up when McDavid's SCF is broken down game by game.

It is as if you are writing your posts with the hope that someone in the future will read them and think you are saying accurate things.

This business of pretending Crosby's scoreless games somehow "do not reflect his level of play" whereas McDavid's do is yet another double standard in your Crosby campaign.
 
Last edited:

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
14,328
11,193
That's a valid point tbh.

McDavid just had one of the greatest playoff runs of all time.

But Lemieux/Gretzky etc probably would have stepped up in game 7.

Oh yeah for sure - in fact we can just assume it without even looking at the actual history.

No doubt Lemieux "stepped up" in his game 7 in 1989 where the other team scored 3 goals with him on the ice in a 4-1 loss to the hated Flyers.

Or the 1994 game 6 loss where Lemieux somehow managed to be on the ice for 3 goals against vs Washington (or was it 4?).

Or the 1996 game 7 loss against the amazing powerhouse expansion team Florida Panthers led by the illustrious Scott Mellanby where Lemieux managed a powerplay assist while the Panthers scored 2 of their 3 goals with Mario spectating from the ice.

Or the 1997 game 6 against the hated Flyers where Mario somehow managed to be a minus 4 despite scoring an ES point. So your idea of "would have stepped up his game" is being on the ice for 5 goals against?

Or the game 7 win against Buffalo in 2001 in which Lemieux had zero points?

Or the 3 consecutive losses to close out the 2001 Devils series in which Lemieux had a combined 1 assist despite playing 24 minutes per game?

The actual history sure seems mutually exclusive from your assumption that "Mario probably would have stepped up." There are plenty of examples where he didn't despite his playoff sample size being quite small due to Mario's teams missing the playoffs so many times despite playing in an NHL where 16 out of 21 teams made it in every year.
 
Last edited:

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
11,096
8,068
Brampton, ON
Oh yeah for sure - in fact we can just assume it without even looking at the actual history.

No doubt Lemieux "stepped up" in his game 7 in 1989 where the other team scored 3 goals with him on the ice in a 4-1 loss to the hated Flyers.

Or the 1994 game 6 loss where Lemieux somehow managed to be on the ice for 3 goals against vs Washington (or was it 4?).

Or the 1996 game 7 loss against the amazing powerhouse expansion team Florida Panthers led by the illustrious Scott Mellanby where Lemieux managed a powerplay assist while the Panthers scored 2 of their 3 goals with Mario spectating from the ice.

Or the 1997 game 6 against the hated Flyers where Mario somehow managed to be a minus 4 despite scoring an ES point. So your idea of "would have stepped up his game" is being on the ice for 5 goals against?

Or the game 7 win against Buffalo in 2001 in which Lemieux had zero points?

Or the 3 consecutive losses to close out the 2001 Devils series in which Lemieux had a combined 1 assist?

The actual history sure seems mutually exclusive from your assumption that "Mario probably would have stepped up." There are plenty of examples where he didn't despite his playoff sample size being quite small due to Mario's teams missing he playoffs so many times despite playing in an NHL where 16 out of 21 teams made it in every year.

There's also this...



Not his fault his defenseman made such a stupid pass but a rather uninspired effort getting back by Mario there.

But I don't know - it seems like some of the talk in this thread is just to try to twist events into fitting a certain narrative that matches a preconceived notion certain posters have.
 

GreatGonzo

Registered User
May 26, 2011
9,387
3,466
South Of the Tank
Im not talking about crosby. Im talking about the top 4 players. Im comparing mcdavid to them
So you don’t see the problem with holding something against McDavid that not even your golden Boy didn’t do? Interesting.

Do you have Crosby 5th?
OT winner in canada cup and b2b smytges with 78 points n 2 cups silences all that gibberish
78 points? Where are you getting this?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Voight and Sentinel

solidmotion

Registered User
Jun 5, 2012
626
319
Oh yeah for sure - in fact we can just assume it without even looking at the actual history.

No doubt Lemieux "stepped up" in his game 7 in 1989 where the other team scored 3 goals with him on the ice in a 4-1 loss to the hated Flyers.

Or the 1994 game 6 loss where Lemieux somehow managed to be on the ice for 3 goals against vs Washington (or was it 4?).

Or the 1996 game 7 loss against the amazing powerhouse expansion team Florida Panthers led by the illustrious Scott Mellanby where Lemieux managed a powerplay assist while the Panthers scored 2 of their 3 goals with Mario spectating from the ice.

Or the 1997 game 6 against the hated Flyers where Mario somehow managed to be a minus 4 despite scoring an ES point. So your idea of "would have stepped up his game" is being on the ice for 5 goals against?

Or the game 7 win against Buffalo in 2001 in which Lemieux had zero points?

Or the 3 consecutive losses to close out the 2001 Devils series in which Lemieux had a combined 1 assist?

The actual history sure seems mutually exclusive from your assumption that "Mario probably would have stepped up." There are plenty of examples where he didn't despite his playoff sample size being quite small due to Mario's teams missing he playoffs so many times despite playing in an NHL where 16 out of 21 teams made it in every year.
can't believe i'm saying this but you are absolutely right. there are also times that gretzky didn't "step up" by these criteria: vs NYI in 83 (only 4 assists in 4 games), vs calgary in 86 (1 measly assist in game 7), vs montreal in 93 (lost 3 straight OT games). nitpicking at this level is fine but one can take it too far. even the best players get shut down sometimes.

re mcdavid specifically, not sure if it's been mentioned in this thread but he contributed to something like 49% of edmonton's goals in the 2024 playoffs. not quite a record iirc (i think gretzky was in on over half at some point) but pretty close, maybe #2. i don't think you can ask for much more than that...
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,180
20,094
Oh yeah for sure - in fact we can just assume it without even looking at the actual history.

No doubt Lemieux "stepped up" in his game 7 in 1989 where the other team scored 3 goals with him on the ice in a 4-1 loss to the hated Flyers.

Or the 1994 game 6 loss where Lemieux somehow managed to be on the ice for 3 goals against vs Washington (or was it 4?).

Or the 1996 game 7 loss against the amazing powerhouse expansion team Florida Panthers led by the illustrious Scott Mellanby where Lemieux managed a powerplay assist while the Panthers scored 2 of their 3 goals with Mario spectating from the ice.

Or the 1997 game 6 against the hated Flyers where Mario somehow managed to be a minus 4 despite scoring an ES point. So your idea of "would have stepped up his game" is being on the ice for 5 goals against?

Or the game 7 win against Buffalo in 2001 in which Lemieux had zero points?

Or the 3 consecutive losses to close out the 2001 Devils series in which Lemieux had a combined 1 assist?

The actual history sure seems mutually exclusive from your assumption that "Mario probably would have stepped up." There are plenty of examples where he didn't despite his playoff sample size being quite small due to Mario's teams missing he playoffs so many times despite playing in an NHL where 16 out of 21 teams made it in every year.
Yeah this is my issue a lot of times, it’s the constant deification that comes from a hindsight/completion bias. It’s amazing Gretzky and Lemieux didn’t win the Cup every year of their career the way it’s discussed…
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,658
6,170
How much talk there is about McDavid not winning after that performance vs Draisaitl not winning with his 2 goals the last 2 round of the playoff, show the gap that was created between the 2.

Not so long ago there was some they are close to each other's in the playoff talk. People expecting him despite Drai injury was putting the bar quite high.
 
Last edited:

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
8,327
8,996
Regina, Saskatchewan
How much talk there is about McDavid not winning after that performance vs Draisaitl not winning with his 2 goals the last 2 round of the playoff performance, show the gap that was created between the 2.

Not so long ago there was some they are close to each other's in the playoff talk. People expecting him despite Drai injury was putting the bar quite high.
He had some big injuries, but this is also three playoffs in a row where his injuries got him in the series they were eliminated in.

More a load management problem than skill, but still notable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sentinel

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,656
11,543
How much talk there is about McDavid not winning after that performance vs Draisaitl not winning with his 2 goals the last 2 round of the playoff performance, show the gap that was created between the 2.

Not so long ago there was some they are close to each other's in the playoff talk. People expecting him despite Drai injury was putting the bar quite high.
It's funny that despite Drai people injured some people are still ragging on him.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad