haveandare
Registered User
So it is just a coincidence then that teams like St Louis and San Jose routinely fall short with mediocre goalies and otherwise strong teams?
Last edited by a moderator:
But how come? You know in every sport or even trade there are people who are better than the rest. Be it track and field, football, basketball, soccer, you name it. Even in hockey there are elite players, but for the position of goalie there isn't?
I don't think there is just because the gap is so small it's not correct to call a goalie elite. If there was a goalie pulling in like 95% consistently than that would be elite. So far there hasn't been an elite goalie.
So it is just a coincidence then that teams like St Louis and San Jose routinely fall short with mediocre goalies and otherwise strong teams?
One thing that is important and overlooked is the ability of a goaltender to play the puck well. If a goalie can make breakout passes that gets his team scoring chances, that is pretty valuable.
Vesa Toskala who is thought of as one of the worst goalies in recent NHL history stopped over 90% of shots in his career. He didn't stop 91 or 92% because he faced tons more high quality chances while playing for garbage Toronto.
He went from 91.4% with the Sharks to 89.4% with the Leafs. Anyone getting my point?
I don't think there is just because the gap is so small it's not correct to call a goalie elite. If there was a goalie pulling in like 95% consistently than that would be elite. So far there hasn't been an elite goalie.
What is the point you're trying to make here? Seriously - I'm not trolling.
I'm pretty sure he's trying to argue that since all NHL goalies have stats that fall into a relatively small numerical range, nobody is elite.
You're putting too much stock into the goaltender position. The team is responsible for what types of chances the goalie faces.
So, let's skip a hundred steps of back and forth and get to the real crux of this.
Why do professional coaches and GMs who have had tons of success, won champions, in the case of LA's GM built the closest thing to a dynasty we've seen in years - all pay top goalies top dollar?
Is the contention here that you get something that all of them don't?
I don't think there is just because the gap is so small it's not correct to call a goalie elite. If there was a goalie pulling in like 95% consistently than that would be elite. So far there hasn't been an elite goalie.
Vesa Toskala who is thought of as one of the worst goalies in recent NHL history stopped over 90% of shots in his career. He didn't stop 91 or 92% because he faced tons more high quality chances while playing for Toronto.
He went from 91.4% with the Sharks to 89.4% with the Leafs. Anyone getting my point?
I'm pretty sure he's trying to argue that since all NHL goalies have stats that fall into a relatively small numerical range, nobody is elite.
That's like saying the Earth is flat, it's completely wrong, not even close by accident.
If there was no statistical difference between goalies, they would all be the same and that's a preposterous statement. There's quite a bit of difference in fact between a crappy goalie that gets hot like Dubnyk and an all world goalie like Hank.
Why do Carey Price and Dustin Tokarski have drastically different numbers?
Why do Carey Price and Dustin Tokarski have drastically different numbers?
I think you're taking a pretty common viewpoint and just pushing it too far.
Rinne's 0.931 and Hutton's 0.906 too.
Hutton played in only 15 games. If they split the games we'd see much closer numbers. Plus it can be because Hutton is having a cold stretch and/or Rinne is having a hot stretch.
Could it be that Hutton isn't anywhere near as productive in the games when Rinne, the world class goaltender, needs a breather?