C Will Smith - Boston College, NCAA (2023, 4th, SJS)

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,576
13,025
Canada
taking the future 100 pt center over the future 70 pt winger any day of the week
I dont know if this is a bit or legit but Id wager Carlsson is easily a PPG+ center you can match up against anyone. Id take a big 2 way monster in the Barkov/Kopitar mold over a skilled point produced who for the sake of my point Ill generously say is in the Hughes mold
 

rt

Clean Hits on Substack
You think Smith is the center and Carlsson the winger?
I don’t know which position each will play in the NHL but Smith has played almost exclusively center over the last two seasons while Carlsson has played almost exclusively on the wing, right? I’ve on out ever seen Smith play center. And outside of the WC, it seems like Carlsson has been a winger during league play the vast majority of the time, hasn’t he?
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,535
32,519
I don’t know which position each will play in the NHL but Smith has played almost exclusively center over the last two seasons while Carlsson has played almost exclusively on the wing, right? I’ve on out ever seen Smith play center. And outside of the WC, it seems like Carlsson has been a winger during league play the vast majority of the time, hasn’t he?

Smith takes the draw then typically plays the winger role. Which is fine, that's the NTDP and they have their own way of doing things. So he's not really a center in the same context. And it's frankly hard to imagine an NHL coach on a winning team putting Smith at center. He's not alive until the puck is on his stick.

Carlsson was eased into the SHL on the wing, in the same way Elias Pettersson and every other forward was when they were 17 or 18 years old. The remarkable thing was when Carlsson was selected to play center on the Men's World Championship team, that is really rare.
 

rt

Clean Hits on Substack
Smith takes the draw then typically plays the winger role. Which is fine, that's the NTDP and they have their own way of doing things. So he's not really a center in the same context. And it's frankly hard to imagine an NHL coach on a winning team putting Smith at center. He's not alive until the puck is on his stick.

Carlsson was eased into the SHL on the wing, in the same way Elias Pettersson and every other forward was when they were 17 or 18 years old. The remarkable thing was when Carlsson was selected to play center on the Men's World Championship team, that is really rare.
There’s some bias in your phrasing.
 

Postulates

Registered User
Jun 7, 2022
410
277
Smith takes the draw then typically plays the winger role. Which is fine, that's the NTDP and they have their own way of doing things. So he's not really a center in the same context. And it's frankly hard to imagine an NHL coach on a winning team putting Smith at center. He's not alive until the puck is on his stick.

Carlsson was eased into the SHL on the wing, in the same way Elias Pettersson and every other forward was when they were 17 or 18 years old. The remarkable thing was when Carlsson was selected to play center on the Men's World Championship team, that is really rare.
he was reverted back to wing when the real play started in the elimination games
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
49,751
22,801
Bay Area
Smith takes the draw then typically plays the winger role. Which is fine, that's the NTDP and they have their own way of doing things. So he's not really a center in the same context. And it's frankly hard to imagine an NHL coach on a winning team putting Smith at center. He's not alive until the puck is on his stick.

Carlsson was eased into the SHL on the wing, in the same way Elias Pettersson and every other forward was when they were 17 or 18 years old. The remarkable thing was when Carlsson was selected to play center on the Men's World Championship team, that is really rare.
The problem with saying the bolded is that there are plenty of natural NHL centers you could say that about. Leon Draisaitl, who is the most dominant playoff scorer in the world, comes to mind. Joe Thornton was the same way until he was in his 30’s. Evgeni Malkin is possibly the worst defensive 1st line center out there. There are plenty of guys who made it as NHL centers without being high motor defenders, because being a center is more than positioning in the defensive zone.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,535
32,519
The problem with saying the bolded is that there are plenty of natural NHL centers you could say that about. Leon Draisaitl, who is the most dominant playoff scorer in the world, comes to mind. Joe Thornton was the same way until he was in his 30’s. Evgeni Malkin is possibly the worst defensive 1st line center out there. There are plenty of guys who made it as NHL centers without being high motor defenders, because being a center is more than positioning in the defensive zone.

Okay, what are the other parts you had in mind?
 

ozzie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2005
1,847
668
Australia
How much is Smith's success a result of his line mates? or is he driving their play? I honestly don't know much about him other than the 'best line outside the NHL' comments being thrown around. Are they just clicking as a unit or are each pretty good?
 

Kalv

Slava Ukraini
Mar 29, 2009
24,087
11,980
Latvia
Some of those Carlsson takes are beyond brutal.

He's a superior prospect to Smith and it isn't particularly close.
As someone who has several times noted some flaws in Carlssons game, so much this.

Carlsson would be #1 pick in some years, I'm sure. Everyone has flaws. But you take Carlsson ahead of Smith any day of the week, IMO. And Smith is pretty good.
 

DatDude44

Hmmmm?
Feb 23, 2012
6,224
3,020
How much is Smith's success a result of his line mates? or is he driving their play? I honestly don't know much about him other than the 'best line outside the NHL' comments being thrown around. Are they just clicking as a unit or are each pretty good?
Without Ryan Leonard, Smith's opportunities to create offense with the puck on his stick would be cut in half almost...yes i'm exaggerating a bit but that's how much dirty work leonard did shift in and shift out to win pucks and get the puck to his playmakers(smith and perreault) in my viewings.
 

OKR

Registered User
Nov 18, 2015
3,593
3,812
Some of those Carlsson takes are beyond brutal.

He's a superior prospect to Smith and it isn't particularly close.
He is clearly the better prospect in my mind, but majority of these Carlsson takes have been beyond brutal from both sides tbh.

It’s quite rare to see a prospect whose fans and haters both seem to lack all objectivity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotProkofievian

CBJx614

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 25, 2012
16,271
8,241
C-137
Without Ryan Leonard, Smith's opportunities to create offense with the puck on his stick would be cut in half almost...yes i'm exaggerating a bit but that's how much dirty work leonard did shift in and shift out to win pucks and get the puck to his playmakers(smith and perreault) in my viewings.
From what little I've seen and read about Smith this tends to be where the red flags show up and why people put Carlsson above Smith. He never goes to work in the dirty areas, he's not great down low and plays a terrible off puck game.

Sure he might be able to do it, but if he's not doing it against his peers(even if it's because of the system he's in) what makes people believe he can do it against grown professionals?

When you're picking someone to be the go to guy, they can't be one dimensional like that.
 

DatDude44

Hmmmm?
Feb 23, 2012
6,224
3,020
From what little I've seen and read about Smith this tends to be where the red flags show up and why people put Carlsson above Smith. He never goes to work in the dirty areas, he's not great down low and plays a terrible off puck game.

Sure he might be able to do it, but if he's not doing it against his peers(even if it's because of the system he's in) what makes people believe he can do it against grown professionals?

When you're picking someone to be the go to guy, they can't be one dimensional like that.
Correct, he's a great talent, but needs alot of time to develop and round out his game. Also needs to be willing to do it. This is where knowing his character makes a massive difference for a team taking him with a top 10 pick or not and part of the draft process that we as fans don't have the resources to know.
 

Junohockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 16, 2018
15,088
12,822
In order of talent and impact, this is how i have it:

Bedard slightly ahead of Michkov
Fantilli
Carlsson / Smith (tied)

The gap between Fantilli and Carlsson/Smith is not huge IMO.

If Michkov drops to 5, the Habs grab him and thank their lucky stars.
 

Rabid Ranger

2 is better than one
Feb 27, 2002
31,486
11,690
Murica
Correct, he's a great talent, but needs alot of time to develop and round out his game. Also needs to be willing to do it. This is where knowing his character makes a massive difference for a team taking him with a top 10 pick or not and part of the draft process that we as fans don't have the resources to know.

This is overblown. He plays on a stacked line on a stacked team and has carte blanche to do what he wants. He has shown a willingness to adapt as needed and will continue to do so in a year or so of college before he plays in the NHL. Also, let's watch the use of the word "character." He has no character concerns. You can like Carlsson or whoever more but there's a lot of digging deep here. What's next? Wide turns ala Jack Hughes?
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
49,751
22,801
Bay Area
Okay, what are the other parts you had in mind?
The offensive parts? Smith strikes me as a pure center in the offensive (and neutral) zone. I suppose I don’t have any hard-hitting analysis to back that up, but everything in the offensive zone runs through Smith.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,535
32,519
The offensive parts? Smith strikes me as a pure center in the offensive (and neutral) zone. I suppose I don’t have any hard-hitting analysis to back that up, but everything in the offensive zone runs through Smith.

He doesn't look like a center in the neutral zone. Smith tends to take a pass when he's already in the neutral zone or at his blueline and then do a zone entry on the wing, kind of like Panarin or Kane. A center would be helping on the zone exit. Even lax defenders like Malkin and Draisaitl will still play that center role on zone exits where they come up the middle with speed.

In the offensive zone these days it's F1, F2, F3, so it doesn't really tell you anything. If the play runs through him inside the zone that's great and valuable but that's not a center or wing thing. Like someone forgot to tell Matthews and Marner they were doing it backwards.
 

NotProkofievian

Registered User
Nov 29, 2011
24,879
25,451
You can't really compare shooting between prospects without including the fact that one of the prospects just doesn't like to shoot very much. Both Will and Leo are playmakers and always will be, but Will Smith has at least as good of a shot as Leo, and will actually use it.

I don't think the ''playing against men'' is a good counterargument in this case either. Most prospects look like trash in the SHL, they can barely keep up. Leo is the most comfortable forward that I've ever watched at that level. He gets loads of opportunities to shoot, and often prefers a forced pass to a clean look.

I prefer Carlsson to Smith, by the way, but I thought the shooting assessment was off.
 

Marc the Habs Fan

Moderator
Nov 30, 2002
99,659
11,643
Longueuil
In the end, if you are drafting Will Smith top 5, you have a top 5 pick in part because you have a team that is in dire need of a huge skill infusion. And Smith will bring that to your franchise.

Worrying about his 2-way game is fine and all but you are missing the point of what makes him a hell of a player.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad