Is he on the RNH level of prospects?
I personally think he's better. his slow start hurt his stat line but he's been playing at a pretty dominant level for awhile now.
Is he on the RNH level of prospects?
As of right now he seems like a MacKinnon-level first overall pick.
I'd say under personally. Taylor Hall type.
So, not a superstar, but really good 1st liner?
I'd say under personally. Taylor Hall type.
He is slowing down, only 1 goal and 3 assists in two games this weekend so far. Third game in three days this afternoon coming up
Two goals and ten assists in four games in Feb. 5th in league scoring and all as a 17 year old
he's Not as highly hyped as matthews. if He were eligible this year, i think he would Be in the group with the finnsHow's he compared to Austin Matthews
Heck of a player and a 1st overall worthy guy looking at the 2017 crop, but he's definitely a step below recent 1st overall picks. He'd be in the mix with the two Finns if he was eligible in 2016 but not convinced he's better than either of them.
Good bloodlines, size and smarts.
Think of a guy like Lecavalier when it comes to a comparison.
So, he's in the mackinnon type prospect?
Mackinnon put up 78 points in his draft -1 in the Q.
Patrick is likely to crack 100 pts in his draft -1 in the Dub.
Take that for what you think its worth.
It really isn't worth anything since Mackinnon's "draft -1" season was his U17 rookie year in the Q while Patrick's "draft -1" season was his U18 sophomore year.
In Mackinnon's rookie year, he had 78 points in 58 games (1.38 PPG) while Patrick had 56 points in 55 games (1.02 PPG).
In Mackinnon's second year in junior, he had 75 points in 45 games (1.70 ppg). Patrick currently has 94 points in 67 games (1.40 ppg).
Note that Mackinnon was born September 1, while Patrick was born September 19, so there's no meaningful difference in their ages during each season.
So possibly putting up 100 points in his draft -1 in the lowest scoring CHL league is worth nothing because he's an early birthday.
Well I guess Matthews really isnt that good either. Better let the scouts and all 30 NHL teams know they are making a mistake.
Your dislike for Patrick is hilarious.
So possibly putting up 100 points in his draft -1 in the lowest scoring CHL league is worth nothing because he's an early birthday?
Well I guess Matthews really isnt that good either. Better let the scouts and all 30 NHL teams know they are making a mistake.
Your dislike for Patrick is hilarious.
I don't really see the dislike here from UWT, what he said is entirely true, and the year age difference is pretty important here when you make a comparison between Patrick and Mackinnon.
When it comes to Matthews, we can compare him with Jack Eichel and their USNTDP numbers since both have similar birthdays (September vs October births). Whereas MacKinnon is literally a year younger than where Patrick is through his current draft-1 year.