Jason MacIsaac
Registered User
I agree, if Dylan Strome can go back for another year, so can Michael McLeod. They need to add a playmaker though.
He certainly has the skill to be a 2nd line centerI see McLoed as a top flight 3rd line center. Not enough skill to be a top sixer.
From an outside POV, these Devils threads (Zacha and now McLeod) do seem plagued with doubters/haters
I agree, if Dylan Strome can go back for another year, so can Michael McLeod. They need to add a playmaker though.
Classic Devil brought it up and I think it's an interesting point...I expect him to get at least the 9 games..
so I don't think any decisions will be made until then.
Drafting Nolan or Nico may push him out of the line-up this year as it will likely be McLeod vs. Quenneville (or Zacha/Henrique but I imagine both will be at LW) for the 3C position.. and Q is just more polished at this point and has already shown he belongs at the NHL level.
Classic Devil brought it up and I think it's an interesting point...
I wonder if they'll try Mcleod on the right side. It's an organizational need and seems to make a lot of sense.
I wouldn't want him at RW permanently, but for next season it might make sense for him to start there.
He has dominated at the dot in juniors so I would like to see him at center going forward IMO... but it's interesting. I think Q is a better winger than McLeod would be, though things are more complicated since we are deep at LW (Q) and not so much at RW (McLeod). It's mostly because Quenneville has a good shot and is willing to use it.. McLeod looks to be more of a distributer.
There's a decent chance the Devils won't need him to be any more than a 3C going forward, which would be the ideal situation because he would be a very dangerous 3C with his tools and speed. It would really depend on how the organization views Zajac going forward because his defensive acumen also would make him an awesome 3C.. and wasting him as a 4C may not be the best idea.
Center depth would be:
Patrick
Quenneville/Zacha/Henrique (with the other 2 playing a 2LW and 3LW)
McLeod
Zajac
McLeod as a RW would look something like:
Hall - Patrick - Palmieri
Zacha - Quenneville - McLeod
Henrique - Zajac - Speers
Wood - ? - ?
Our bottom 6 RW depth looks to be fairly decent with Speers, Lappin, Bastian, Bratt, etc... so I guess if McLeod can be a 2RW, that would really round things out nicely.
Classic Devil brought it up and I think it's an interesting point...
I wonder if they'll try Mcleod on the right side. It's an organizational need and seems to make a lot of sense.
RW is not McLeod's off-wing. He's a right-handed shot and he has experience in the position, and it's much, much easier to go from center to wing during the transition from juniors to the NHL than from one wing to the other when you're already an established in that position.Makes zero sense to have him there. You were one of the posters on the Devils sub forum saying how hard it is to play someone on their off wing and out of their usual position. McLeod has played RW before, but he is better suited for C, and that is where his game has been learned and where he has played the best.
Eh, some will bust, some will be traded, and two years from now we'll be talking about needing to take a LW in the draft because of organizational weakness, watch.yea, I think the organization is pretty set on Quenneville being a LW or at the very least a winger. It just sucks because our organizational depth at RW is non-existent whereas we are pretty loaded on the left side.
I do very much want him as a center with the Devils in the long-term. Probably the 2C after Patrick/Hischier. But I'm not really comfortable going into the season expecting both McLeod and Hischier to be able to play center at the NHL level as rookies. That seems unwise.Honestly guys, MM just kills it in the facoff dot. You definitely want to develop him as a C.
i'm going to go ahead and guess that most Flyers fans will say they liked the one we didn't pick anyways and that prospect is way better than whoever we picked.
just going to have to wait until the pick is made to see who their favorite is
I do very much want him as a center with the Devils in the long-term. Probably the 2C after Patrick/Hischier. But I'm not really comfortable going into the season expecting both McLeod and Hischier to be able to play center at the NHL level as rookies. That seems unwise.
I'm not opposed to that, but I do expect McLeod to get a cup of coffee to start the season.I think he needs to go back to Mississauga. The Steelheads will be a championship calibre again plus there will be plenty of international tournament opportunities for him throughout the year. The Devils have a really good player and their patience will be rewarded.
I'm not opposed to that, but I do expect McLeod to get a cup of coffee to start the season.
I do very much want him as a center with the Devils in the long-term. Probably the 2C after Patrick/Hischier. But I'm not really comfortable going into the season expecting both McLeod and Hischier to be able to play center at the NHL level as rookies. That seems unwise.
I'm not insisting on it. I'm just saying if he's going to play in the NHL this year, unless we move players there just isn't a spot at center for him (and if we do move players, it means relying heavily on rookies at center which is risky) and he's capable of playing RW if we want to give him that cup of coffee and see if he's capable of sticking.Who do they have that you could say would be better options over them even with them being rookies?
Putting them out of position would be unwise. Look at how Seguin looked at RW in Boston, he did not look good when he was shifted out of position, when he went back to center in Dallas he tore it up. IDK why you insist on moving him to wing, especially when there are not that many better options to play center over him. Boohoo, two rookies might be playing center at the same time. Time to get used to that idea. If they are the best player for the position play them.