Toggle sidebar

C Logan Stankoven - Texas, AHL (2021, 47th, DAL)

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Skinnyjimmy08 said:
Ya I'd say everyone would agree that both Sillinger and Guenther have been more impressive that Stankoven this season. Sillinger is a very special player
Click to expand...


lol christ don't quit your day job scooter. Stankhoven isn't going to be the "next big thing". I agree Sillinger and Guenther have been more consistent. But for you to say Logan is having "a basic 16 year old season", shows that you should probably stick to flipping burgers, as scouting is not your thing.
 
Juniorhockeyguru said:
2 more goals today so far. 25 on the season. Pretty ordinary 16 year old season.
Click to expand...

He's on pace for 31 in 64 games, or 0.48 GPG, which if he hits 31 puts him in the top 14, 16 year old seasons, all time in the WHL. Pretty solid for sure.

Nolan Patrick had 30 in 55 games, or a 0.55 GPG pace, so he's already well above Stankoven's pace.
Reinhart had 28 in 67, Schenn had 28 in 66 and Eberle had 28 in 66 as well.

We will see where he finishes once the season is over. No one is saying that he isn't a solid scorer. I'm just saying I think Sillinger and Guenther are more well rounded players right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast, Garyboy, Dominance and 1 other person
13 goals in his last 21 games since after Christmas. And 25 points overall. Guenther has 12 goals and 27 points in 20 games. So they are pretty comparable as the season has gotten tougher.
 
Last edited:
Daximus said:
He's on pace for 31 in 64 games, or 0.48 GPG, which if he hits 31 puts him in the top 14, 16 year old seasons, all time in the WHL. Pretty solid for sure.

Nolan Patrick had 30 in 55 games, or a 0.55 GPG pace, so he's already well above Stankoven's pace.
Reinhart had 28 in 67, Schenn had 28 in 66 and Eberle had 28 in 66 as well.

We will see where he finishes once the season is over. No one is saying that he isn't a solid scorer. I'm just saying I think Sillinger and Guenther are more well rounded players right now.
Click to expand...

Ya right now I have those 2 over Stankoven too. But when he is 18 and 19 years old he will be a scoring machine... By the time his junior career is over, I am gonna assume he has very high point totals.

I know many people were saying 70+ points this year as a 16 year old but it's not gonna happen.. next year though he should hit those totals
 
Skinnyjimmy08 said:
Ya right now I have those 2 over Stankoven too. But when he is 18 and 19 years old he will be a scoring machine... By the time his junior career is over, I am gonna assume he has very high point totals.

I know many people were saying 70+ points this year as a 16 year old but it's not gonna happen.. next year though he should hit those totals
Click to expand...

I could see him flirting with 100 points easily.

The thing is I still have no idea on his NHL future, just good or star potential?
 
Skinnyjimmy08 said:
Ya right now I have those 2 over Stankoven too. But when he is 18 and 19 years old he will be a scoring machine... By the time his junior career is over, I am gonna assume he has very high point totals.

I know many people were saying 70+ points this year as a 16 year old but it's not gonna happen.. next year though he should hit those totals
Click to expand...

Stankhoven is on pace for 31 goals and 51 points in 64 games. So that's some pretty good company.

16 yr old WHL season
S.Reinhart: 67-28-34-62
N.Patrick: 55-30-26-56
N.Merkley: 66-25-33-58
B.Point: 67-24-33-57
P.Krebs: 67-17-37-54
D.Cozens: 57-22-31-53
 
wetcoast said:
I could see him flirting with 100 points easily.

The thing is I still have no idea on his NHL future, just good or star potential?
Click to expand...

Yeah Kamloops will be a good team for at least a few years as well so he definitely has a chance at hitting some decent totals and really upping his projection on draft day. He's still going to be a short kid coming into the draft though and with how defencemen heavy next years class is I think he will be in the upper end of the top of the class but may drop due to a number of factors height and being a winger key among them.
 
Daximus said:
Yeah Kamloops will be a good team for at least a few years as well so he definitely has a chance at hitting some decent totals and really upping his projection on draft day. He's still going to be a short kid coming into the draft though and with how defencemen heavy next years class is I think he will be in the upper end of the top of the class but may drop due to a number of factors height and being a winger key among them.
Click to expand...

He's a natural center and 54% on the draw as a 16. So while agree with the height argument, I don't with the winger argument.
 
If he doesn't grow his size will likely prevent him from sticking at C. He is pretty similar to Brendan Gallagher with not quite the same edge to his game but also slightly more skilled of player. His numbers are impressive this year considering he doesn't get 1st PP time but should next year with the graduating players moving on
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dominance
landy92mack29 said:
If he doesn't grow his size will likely prevent him from sticking at C. He is pretty similar to Brendan Gallagher with not quite the same edge to his game but also slightly more skilled of player. His numbers are impressive this year considering he doesn't get 1st PP time but should next year with the graduating players moving on
Click to expand...


He's on the 3rd line most of the time as well. He is a great skater and is extremely tenacious.
 
landy92mack29 said:
If he doesn't grow his size will likely prevent him from sticking at C. He is pretty similar to Brendan Gallagher with not quite the same edge to his game but also slightly more skilled of player. His numbers are impressive this year considering he doesn't get 1st PP time but should next year with the graduating players moving on
Click to expand...

Ya his size will be an issue. Sure smaller guys have made it to the NHL before but he is very small. He is already built like a tank and body is mature so in my opinion he wont grow anymore unfortunately. Also, both of his parents are very short. His dad is around 5'8 and his mom is around 5 feet... He is listed at 5'7 but that is still even quite an exaggeration. When you see him off ice, its shocking just how short he is

But by the time he is 18 and 19 years old, I have no doubt in my mind he will be putting up huge points in the WHL. He will be one of the league leaders in points by then
 
phillipsj89 said:
He's a natural center and 54% on the draw as a 16. So while agree with the height argument, I don't with the winger argument.
Click to expand...

Being a natural center in the WHL doesnt mean that you will be a center in the NHL. I'd almost guarantee he will be a winger at the NHL level. There are exactly zero top 6 sub 5'9 centers in the NHL right now. And he is definitely much shorter than 5'9.
 
wetcoast said:
Man you are right that preseason poll having them as the 5th best CHL team was dead on and it only took you 5 months to expose me...well only on the point that Kamloops is in the mix for the 5ish best team in the WHL.:bow:
Click to expand...

You doubted they'd be a top 5 team in the WHL genius as well.
 
Juniorhockeyguru said:
You doubted they'd be a top 5 team in the WHL genius as well.
Click to expand...

My real problem was that they were ranked in the top 5 in the CHL poll, your comments are so much easier after the fact you get a ribbon for that I guess.

But this thread is about Stankoven so let's get back to that and hope that he continues to develop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom