Juniorhockeyguru
Registered User
- Nov 18, 2012
- 1,169
- 567
Is he better or worse prospect than Wyatt Johnson?
Johnson is a year younger and a 40+ pt NHL player now
I see his ceiling as a 80-90 pt center for the stars
Think stankoven is similar but at wing
They are different types of players. I think Stankoven has the higher offensive ceiling while Johnston is more of an all-around player. I regarded Johnston a bit higher as a prospect overall. Both should be great top 6 piecesIs he better or worse prospect than Wyatt Johnson?
Johnson is a year younger and a 40+ pt NHL player now
I see his ceiling as a 80-90 pt center for the stars
Think stankoven is similar but at wing
Is he better or worse prospect than Wyatt Johnson?
Johnson is a year younger and a 40+ pt NHL player now
I see his ceiling as a 80-90 pt center for the stars
Think stankoven is similar but at wing
Your right got the draft class mixed upThey are the same age.
Call me a homer but with Wyatt basically repeating Benn's rookie numbers as a year younger and a clear cut C I think he legit challenges Hintz for the 1C spot in a year or 2.Is he better or worse prospect than Wyatt Johnson?
Johnson is a year younger and a 40+ pt NHL player now
I see his ceiling as a 80-90 pt center for the stars
Think stankoven is similar but at wing
Might not stick at center because of our prospect depth thoKids a Brayden Point 2.0
I mean its a great problem to have and he is definately a calibre of a prospect that you would like to try at C... but he would have to surpass Hintz or Johnston or Bourque. While Bourque is realistic, I would rather have Stanks shot on the wing and Bouque passing in the middle.In his last 25 play-offs games, that's.. play-offs games
27 goals, 52 points.
230/402 at the dot (57.5 %)
I know that he is 5 foot 8 and a center but... would hate to see him other than playing center position in the NHL
He IS a center and helluva one at that.