Hockey Duckie
Registered User
Aren’t controlled entries easier on bigger ice?
As @Kalv said, technically it should be when looked at in a vacuum. Add other factors in such as quality of play, quality of players, and speed of players. The SHL is a better quality of play defensively than the NCAA. That quality of play is due to the SHL being a men's professional league whereas the NCAA is from ages 18 - 25. In a podcast interview with Carlsson and Leonard from former NHL and SHL players, the interviewing panel cite how much better the defense is at the SHL such that you rarely get odd man situations.
Age is another contextual factor. Carlsson is playing against men as an 17/18 year old. Fantilli is playing against most of his peers, which he dominated the NCAA as shown by winning the top NCAA player award, Hobey Baker, and did it as a first year player. Fantilli was the highest goal scorer and points producer in the NCAA.
Now we look at the players traits. Fantilli is one of the fastest players in the NCAA and he should be able to have better controlled exits and entries, despite the smaller rink. Being the highest scorer in the NCAA, one would think Fantilli possesses great metrics across the board. Carlsson's speed is average, which should make it more difficult for Carlsson to have controlled exits and entries. This is why video scouting is important to watch to understand why there is a vast difference in ratings. We can visually identify hockey sense. Fantilli doesn't use his teammates much in transition because his teammates can't keep up with him, which mean's he's in alone often. If Fantilli isn't on a breakaway, then it's a dead end for Fantilli. Carlsson uses puck manipulation against defenders early in transition to open up passing lanes to other teammates as well as know passing lanes going into the OZ to be available for the puck from his teammates. That's how cerebral Carlsson is at the game.