Alexandrov
Registered User
- Dec 5, 2011
- 1,204
- 105
And I accept that, but you need to accept that I've heard different. Making both just as valid.
It's not the quote I've referenced but it's showing that I'm not the only one hearing this stuff.
"I remember reading that some scouts have said they would take Matthews ahead of Eichel - but it's close."
https://www.reddit.com/r/hockey/comments/348umt/is_auston_matthews_considered_better_than_eichel/
]
You know, it's weird that there are a decent amount of people who believe they read something like that, but nobody seems to be able to find a source.
I'm going to go out of the limb here and say that most of this stuff is a result of poor information evaluation, misinterpreting or misremembering what was said by whom, and cognitive biases. What I mean by that - well...maybe that redditor actually read a post on HFboards where somebody said THEY remember reading scouts think matthews > eichel. No source, nothing. Then a couple of months later, this particular redditor only remembers the content, not the context. And now we have a redditor who's sure they read somewhere that scouts think Matthews is better than Eichel, when there was no source in the first place.