Leaf Fans
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 21,565
- 9,537
yeah, games 5,6,7 if it goes that long, are not the time to take revenge.Bunting should thank DoPs for postponing his payback till next year. Gutless turd.
yeah, games 5,6,7 if it goes that long, are not the time to take revenge.Bunting should thank DoPs for postponing his payback till next year. Gutless turd.
Idk about that. The game was slipping away from them before that hit. The major certainly didn't help.Agree, bunting too volatile for a team that historically lacks heart/motivation. This is def a case of addition by subtraction.
He killed the leafs momentum last night, I think if bunting didn’t go full moron, leafs win that game
No man it’s true, I was the phonePossibly, but I doubt that.
I have in the past, and will still continue in the future to shit on the DoPS..
But I’m really happy with this. I was sure he’d only get one game, maaaaybe too.
Maybe too optimistic to assume this will set a standard for the rest of the playoffs… but this would be the way to do it.
Most head hits aren’t intentional targeting. Knowingly reckless sure, but most are that or pure accident.
Incidents like this are way less common. Bunting has no respect for the game and deserved a long suspension.
Blatantly intentional non-plays like that, where anyone reasonable couldn’t understand what hockey play the hitter thought he was making… this looked like that, and those deserve auto harsh suspensions.
Then he isn't talented enough to be in the league. If you have to play in an unsafe manner to make it, you don't really belong.The thing is, is the moment he stops playing close to the line is the moment he stops being effective. Players like that need to play close to the line.
OK, he did lose in Tampa a week or 2 ago though.Lightning killer Matthew Knies enters the lineup
Yeah I'm aware inconsistency goes back more than just one call. I'm not an idiot. The whole first line is obtuse nonsense.
What I'm saying is they can't retroactively go back and change prior suspension decisions. You're wringing your wrists over spilled milk. All you're doing by waxing poetic about consistency is implying that the punishment here should have arbitrarily followed past decisions, here, the Hartman suspension length of 1 game, to maintain consistency whether Hartman deserved more or whether Bunting deserved less.
Yeah the DOPS is inconsistent, and? What is gained from whining about it? The DOPS' inconsistency has known known for well over the last decade at least. Whining about it on HF isn't going to make the department take a read and reevaluate their standards and practices. All we can do is watch and say they got it wrong or right.
OK, he did lose in Tampa a week or 2 ago though.
It's the new normal random suspension. It was pretty much classic Dustin Brown to me. If my backs kinda turned there's no way they can prove I meant to do that.Pretty absurd suspension given what the same office has allowed go in previous playoffs..
If it's the new normal. I'm all for it.
I think they usually go lower if the player could conceivably argue he thought there was a hockey play there and accidentally caught the head. The hit alone really eliminates that, but also the immediate guilty “what for” and the 10/10 dive earlier makes him seem extremely disingenuous3 playoff games is INSANE when we're comparing to their previous record of suspensions. for years it's been 1 playoff game=2 regular season games and this seemed like your typical 2-gamer
i'm not gonna complain, this is about as cheap of a cheapshot as it gets but i'm just shocked by the severity
Did Minnesota win?Edit this while you can (go check the score)
Did Minnesota win?
Explain how. Again. They can't retroactively change a single prior decision. If this suspension is the beginning of consistency and cracking down, how would this be a step in the wrong direction?Your post makes absolutely no sense. What are we deciding is right and wrong?
According to the standards of the DOPS, this suspension is wrong.
According to my standards, this suspension is right and many others are wrong.
That is why consistency is an important topic.
Not sure I'd say I am whining about it, I think Bunting being out may be a good thing. I guess I am whining about wanting the DOPS to take player safety more seriously potentially, this is not a step toward that.
No shit. A game that meant nothing, was talking about a game that meant something. I'm sure the Bolts are terrified of him.He played in the game where they beat Tampa... you know, in the NHL
Explain how. Again. They can't retroactively change a single prior decision. If this suspension is the beginning of consistency and cracking down, how would this be a step in the wrong direction?
This is what I'm getting at. You're applying past precedent like it's binding to say that the only way this call would be "correct" is if it lined up with prior decisions that were incorrect in not being lengthy enough. If the league has to lock in every suspension call to one game to maintain consistency with a previous decision, then we get consistency in the form of a consistently incorrect standard and no player safety goals are resolved.
I hope this is the standard now, because it makes players second guess aiming for the head.So has the standard been set or is this only going to apply to Bunting?