Bunting got 5 and a game for elbow to the head of Cernak (suspended 3 games)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Agree, bunting too volatile for a team that historically lacks heart/motivation. This is def a case of addition by subtraction.

He killed the leafs momentum last night, I think if bunting didn’t go full moron, leafs win that game
Idk about that. The game was slipping away from them before that hit. The major certainly didn't help.
 
I have in the past, and will still continue in the future to shit on the DoPS..


But I’m really happy with this. I was sure he’d only get one game, maaaaybe too.


Maybe too optimistic to assume this will set a standard for the rest of the playoffs… but this would be the way to do it.


Most head hits aren’t intentional targeting. Knowingly reckless sure, but most are that or pure accident.

Incidents like this are way less common. Bunting has no respect for the game and deserved a long suspension.


Blatantly intentional non-plays like that, where anyone reasonable couldn’t understand what hockey play the hitter thought he was making… this looked like that, and those deserve auto harsh suspensions.

I'd say naive is a better descriptor than optimistic. Once every year or two they come out with a suspension like this where most people say "yea it's high given other suspensions, but it's probably right from a player safety standpoint. Hopefully they stay consistent." and then inevitably they go back to the usual.

It happened a couple years ago with the Matthews cross checking suspension (not saying the Leafs are getting screwed, I just remember that one easily because it was my team), and it's happened other times too.

The only thing consistent with the DOPS is their totally lack of consistency or care for player safety. They suspend for optics, not for safety.
 
He deserves every second of those three games and when the suspension ends and the Leafs are up 3-1 he doesn't see another playoff game in a Leaf uniform. He doesn't bring anything to the table if he can't be smart while being a rat.
 
3 playoff games is INSANE when we're comparing to their previous record of suspensions. for years it's been 1 playoff game=2 regular season games and this seemed like your typical 2-gamer

i'm not gonna complain, this is about as cheap of a cheapshot as it gets but i'm just shocked by the severity
 
Yeah I'm aware inconsistency goes back more than just one call. I'm not an idiot. The whole first line is obtuse nonsense.

What I'm saying is they can't retroactively go back and change prior suspension decisions. You're wringing your wrists over spilled milk. All you're doing by waxing poetic about consistency is implying that the punishment here should have arbitrarily followed past decisions, here, the Hartman suspension length of 1 game, to maintain consistency whether Hartman deserved more or whether Bunting deserved less.

Yeah the DOPS is inconsistent, and? What is gained from whining about it? The DOPS' inconsistency has known known for well over the last decade at least. Whining about it on HF isn't going to make the department take a read and reevaluate their standards and practices. All we can do is watch and say they got it wrong or right.

Your post makes absolutely no sense. What are we deciding is right and wrong?

According to the standards of the DOPS, this suspension is wrong.

According to my standards, this suspension is right and many others are wrong.

That is why consistency is an important topic.

Not sure I'd say I am whining about it, I think Bunting being out may be a good thing. I guess I am whining about wanting the DOPS to take player safety more seriously potentially, this is not a step toward that.
 
Pretty absurd suspension given what the same office has allowed go in previous playoffs..

If it's the new normal. I'm all for it.
It's the new normal random suspension. It was pretty much classic Dustin Brown to me. If my backs kinda turned there's no way they can prove I meant to do that.
 
3 playoff games is INSANE when we're comparing to their previous record of suspensions. for years it's been 1 playoff game=2 regular season games and this seemed like your typical 2-gamer

i'm not gonna complain, this is about as cheap of a cheapshot as it gets but i'm just shocked by the severity
I think they usually go lower if the player could conceivably argue he thought there was a hockey play there and accidentally caught the head. The hit alone really eliminates that, but also the immediate guilty “what for” and the 10/10 dive earlier makes him seem extremely disingenuous

That and his rep…. He doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt
 
Your post makes absolutely no sense. What are we deciding is right and wrong?

According to the standards of the DOPS, this suspension is wrong.

According to my standards, this suspension is right and many others are wrong.

That is why consistency is an important topic.

Not sure I'd say I am whining about it, I think Bunting being out may be a good thing. I guess I am whining about wanting the DOPS to take player safety more seriously potentially, this is not a step toward that.
Explain how. Again. They can't retroactively change a single prior decision. If this suspension is the beginning of consistency and cracking down, how would this be a step in the wrong direction?

This is what I'm getting at. You're applying past precedent like it's binding to say that the only way this call would be "correct" is if it lined up with prior decisions that were incorrect in not being lengthy enough. If the league has to lock in every suspension call to one game to maintain consistency with a previous decision, then we get consistency in the form of a consistently incorrect standard and no player safety goals are resolved.
 
Explain how. Again. They can't retroactively change a single prior decision. If this suspension is the beginning of consistency and cracking down, how would this be a step in the wrong direction?

This is what I'm getting at. You're applying past precedent like it's binding to say that the only way this call would be "correct" is if it lined up with prior decisions that were incorrect in not being lengthy enough. If the league has to lock in every suspension call to one game to maintain consistency with a previous decision, then we get consistency in the form of a consistently incorrect standard and no player safety goals are resolved.

The suspension won't be the beginning of it, you know, I know it, everyone knows it.

We can pretend it might be, so sure, I am super excited for them moving in this direction!
 
I warned you clowns that Molson's as a bribe to the DPOS is at least 3 steps below Bud Light.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad