I can't remember this much hype over a college FA since Justin Schultz and Mike Reilly.
Don't know how Vesey will turn out as a pro but people need to be reminded, the NHL is a league where it is truly impossible to project how young players will succeed.
For every over-hyped can't miss prospect, there is an over-achieving draft longshot like Brendan Gallagher.
Still think he is being overhandled on this one.
This is a rare enough circumstance that teams will get "excited" about it. Free talent with some upside is a rare commodity, especially when the bonus structure is the only real negotiation to take place.
Vesey might turn out like Kevin Hayes or maybe Blake Wheeler. Or he might bust. Since it only takes a contract to find out, and that contract is largely templated, why not? If Vesey flops or under performs, there are mechanisms to remove him from the team. If he proves to be a steady NHL player, so be it.
From a team standpoint, I would be concerned about the second and third contract comments, if they are true. Teams, like businesses, should think long term, but never plan long term. Players earn their next contracts. The way I read those comments, Vesey is basically telling teams not to bridge him after his entry level deal (which assumes Vesey plays well enough to earn more than a short term deal). It's hubrus, pure and simple.
At 23 going on 24, Vesey will show what he is very quickly and there might not be a lot of ceiling left. It is part of the reason he is concerned about those follow on contracts - he'll need to make his money in the middle age of his career.