Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 25,998
- 13,416
Covers lost Covid revenue probably.Expansion fees don’t drive salary cap.
the fees covers current teams lost revenue the next 25 or so years from TV/ media Media rights.
Covers lost Covid revenue probably.Expansion fees don’t drive salary cap.
the fees covers current teams lost revenue the next 25 or so years from TV/ media Media rights.
What are you doing?
Probably best to take the L and give it up, and get back on topic.No, I said you can't figure out what you're arguing.
Tell me again about how I lied when I've told you multiple times what the article says about league revenue and you refuse to look it up.
Feel free to point out the L, or mind your business.Probably best to take the L and give it up, and get back on topic.
Lol, says the poster who says google says cap will be 100 million, when it doesn’t.Feel free to point out the L, or mind your business.
As a reminder, this entire discussion is about how Dahlin's contract will progress based on cap inflation. It's very much relevant to the topic of Dahlin's contract. Try again.
Lol, says the poster who says google says cap will be 100 million, when it doesn’t.
Why are you so mad? I just asked for source. You then lied about what you read and told me to Google something that doesn't exist, just to turn around and say it was just your take. Why not just say it was just your take in the first place.I'm gonna give you a helpful life tip here. Insisting on having the last word when you have nothing left of value to say doesn't mean you win the argument.
You got an attitude and wanted a source. I reciprocated your attitude and told you to look it up. I then educated you on what the BoG has said about league revenue now and going forward. Once the BoG's revenue numbers were brought and you realized your challenge was baseless you've just been babbling on about random shit since.
Good points. I think it’s a very good move for the Sabres. You have him for basically his entire prime and you have cost certainty. What a great young core.Anybody who thinks Dahlin should have taken less than 10, either doesn’t realize how good he is, or doesn’t understand what contracts are going to look like moving forward.
And it has been repeated ad nauseam, but his deal isn’t comparable to Makar at all. This is essentially a UFA contract for Dahlin, while Makar took a longer contract instead of a bridge.
If anything, Makar made the choice to maximize his earnings because his deal takes him right to UFA where he can walk.
The article about the BoG's revenue reports has been cited multiple times. You're free to look it up.Why are you so mad? I just asked for source. You then lied about what you read and told me to Google something that doesn't exist, just to turn around and say it was just your take. Why not just say it was just your take in the first place.
Now you are mad at me for no reason at all. I'm just finding it interesting that even when I explain I was just looking for a source you're still going nuts. It's not a healthy way to live bud. Hope you get better.
If that was the case, i think edmonton should have won multiple cups already with such underpaid stars.It’s because star players are severely underpaid in the NHL compared to mid tier players. Guys like Makar and Fox should be making 14m and McDavid should be making 20+
Thats super bud. You made a prediction. Good to know. Thanks for the opinion. What are you looking for out of this?The article about the BoG's revenue reports has been cited multiple times. You're free to look it up.
Also, I can assure you that I'm not mad, but it's funny that you seem to see "No reason" that somebody could be mad considering you've called me a liar twice now even though I've told you the article regarding the BoG's report very much does exist.
I'm not lying. You're just too damn lazy to look it up, and it doesn't suit your narrative.
Do you understand how the cap is calculated? You do realize the current cap is well under what revenues dictate it actually should be, right?Thats super bud. You made a prediction. Good to know. Thanks for the opinion. What are you looking for out of this?
Obviously you don’t by the posts above, didn’t include what mouser told you, didn’t allow for the inflator.Do you understand how the cap is calculated?
Also, I accept your apology for falsely claiming I lied. Twice.
Obviously you don’t by the posts above, didn’t include what mouser told you, didn’t allow for the inflator.
You thought it was revenue divided by 64.
Look it would be just easier if you admitted you don’t understand the cap calculation.All three seasons prior to the freeze dictate that the cap was actually higher than 50% revenue divided by the teams, so if anything I'm underestimating.
Keep trying.
It’s crazy Dahlin is only a year older than himI hate what this most likely means for Moritz Seider’s next contract.
Probably somewhere between Sanderson's $8M and Dahlin's $11M.I hate what this most likely means for Moritz Seider’s next contract.