Hopefully it’s something minor like having the flu. I’d be surprised if it’s trade talked, as he’s the straw that stirs the drink on the top line.Thomas not playing tonight?
I’m hoping the same…but with the number of ‘04s we have…Hopefully it’s something minor like having the flu. I’d be surprised if it’s trade talked, as he’s the straw that stirs the drink on the top line.
Awesome. I’m watching the tv broadcast, but it’s NB’s broadcast, so they haven’t said.Duthie confirmed he’s not feeling well.![]()
Agreed. He looks really good.Speaking of Thomas, Jake O'Brien reminds me sooo much of him.
He just gets better and better. His poise and vision are incredible for a 16 yr old.
He has been a nice addition, and he’s having quite a breakout season this year. It’s too bad he got injured but he’s back and it’s probably just a matter of time before back to pre-injury form.How’s Testa been? 10 goals in 16 games looks solid eh!
I’m interested to see what the Bulldogs do in the next few days. Considering who we stand to lose this summer, it makes sense to me to make a push this year, but there are more holes to fill leading up to the deadline than in 2018 and 2022. I think we all agree the D needs work. Special teams has been subpar this season, and we lack a top C for Lardis but Bujold and Xhekaj have been alright. Considering the gaps, I’m hesitant to go all in, but we stand to lose a lot of key players.
Ottawa and North Bay both look like they’ll be adding based on trades today, and Sudbury is the main team to beat in the east.
After this season Drobac and Sherk graduate. Donovan, Hamara, Okitundu, Van Vleet, Bujold, Thomas, and Xhekaj are all possible OAs next season. However, some will likely leave for the AHL anyway.
I think there’s a case to be made between 3 scenarios for the Bulldogs leading up to the deadline:
Scenario 1 - Going all in: I have no interest in trading O’Brien, but the Bulldogs stand to lose a lot of depth and there’s an argument to be made to support making a run now.
Scenario 2 - Minor improvements: considering the holes in the holes in the lineup, I could see the Bulldogs trying to fill a couple key needs and mostly staying with the current roster without unloading a bunch of assets.
Scenario 3 - Minor sell: I’m not a fan of the idea of selling but considering the gaps to be filled, the Bulldogs could listen to offers and trade 1 or 2 in demand players and acquire picks/prospects. Keep the team competitive and focus on building around Vanacker, Testa, O’Brien, and hopefully Egorov.
If it were me I’d probably lean towards a hybrid of minor add and going all in, but there are definitely some gaps to fill, and prices are high.
I agree about Egorov. Prior to the season I thought he needed ice time to get comfortable. He had a good preseason but he’s hardly had decent games during the regular season. So far his development path seems similar to Kaden Fulcher, who was also hyped as a good prospect goaltender but had some rough games, even after becoming the starter in 2017-18. Hopefully Egorov breaks out next season, but if the Bulldogs are buying, he’s a younger player I’d be open to trading.I really hope that I'm wrong, but I just don't see Egorov being a top tier goalie in the OHL. He is only 17 though.
We don't just need Dmen this season, we need them even more next season. Our forward group is strong.
Donovan and Hamara will be gone almost for sure. Thomas will be a lock for one of the spots. I would think Xhekaj (if he doesn't get signed), VanVleet and Bujold will be the others.
I don't see an all in push coming, but who knows. With todays deals it puts more pressure on them.
Should be an interesting 2 days, but I have no interest in seeing O'Brien, Vanacker or Testa being dealt.
Above scenario IMO is best course of action. Trade lower tier players, salt it with picks and pickup D (Mayer, Punnet) and C that can play on top line.Scenario 2 - Minor improvements: considering the holes in the holes in the lineup, I could see the Bulldogs trying to fill a couple key needs and mostly staying with the current roster without unloading a bunch of assets.
I think this is the more likely route they take. Getting Mayer would help, especially on the PP.Above scenario IMO is best course of action. Trade lower tier players, salt it with picks and pickup D (Mayer, Punnet) and C that can play on top line.
Player going on D, wouldn't touch Cheynowski, obvious to me would be Roberts.
Forwards going, Rebelo, Wray and (don't lynch me for this) dangling carrot Brown.
Offensively he's fine. Big problem on our team are defensive breakdowns, and I've seen him so many times not engaging defensively, rather hovering around blue line and waiting for astray puck for breakaway. 5 players need to defend, otherwise there's breakdown.
We can try to trade Ego, but at this point don't think there's any trade value there. Better course of action would be to keep him, and see what he becomes next year.
This is by no means attempt belittling these players, as they did pour their soul into current succes of this team, but to improve you have to give some.
I agree about Egorov. Prior to the season I thought he needed ice time to get comfortable. He had a good preseason but he’s hardly had decent games during the regular season. So far his development path seems similar to Kaden Fulcher, who was also hyped as a good prospect goaltender but had some rough games, even after becoming the starter in 2017-18. Hopefully Egorov breaks out next season, but if the Bulldogs are buying, he’s a younger player I’d be open to trading.
Next year the D will be interesting. I’m sure the Bulldogs will be looking for 1 or 2 D next season (probably not OA). Maybe Adam Jiricek commits next year (still not getting my hopes up), or they get another import to commit. There’s also the overage draft. As a side note, I do think Cheynowski has improved this season, and have definitely noticed improvements with Roberts since mid November or so, but there’s more work to be done.
I definitely wouldn’t trade O’Brien, Testa, or Vanacker either. Even if the Bulldogs do go all in this year (unlikely), those 3 should be untouchable, which makes it difficult to truly go “all in”.
Ouch!
If this is the way management goes, what a downturn. It will kill the room.Scenario 3 - Minor sell: I’m not a fan of the idea of selling but considering the gaps to be filled, the Bulldogs could listen to offers and trade 1 or 2 in demand players and acquire picks/prospects. Keep the team competitive and focus on building around Vanacker, Testa, O’Brien, and hopefully Egorov.
The key part is “minor”. A full tear down like the Petes isn’t even a question. A minor sell would be like trading someone who has value like Brown, Xhekaj, or someone else and acquiring picks and/or prospects.If this is the way management goes, what a downturn. It will kill the room.
There are 30 odd games left in regular season, it'll be hard to watch. Pretty sure kids coming back next year, will not take it lightly either.
From last to first, by corporate decision back, first to last.
It will leave scar tissue.