This thread is going in circles at this point.
1. Marner is an excellent player. To date, he has been better than Tkachuk.
2. Tkachuk is a great player with a very different and more unique skillset for a top line forward.
In a vacuum, I don't think you can deny that Marner has had the bigger impact on his team's success thus far and would likely be the player most teams would prefer.
But, depending on a team's needs, a squad already flush with a lot of creative offensive finesse types might opt for a slightly less offensive option in Tkachuk who maintains a number of alternative tangible benefits including hitting and checking, overall toughness and fighting ability and net presence.
Skills that some believe might be of greater value in the playoffs, where the officiating traditionally is less stringent, despite the fact that Tkachuk has yet to play a game in the post-season. Maybe he will be a terrible playoff player, as Leaf fans keep pointing out, but I'd still put my money on his combination of skill, size, toughness and tenacity as being a valuable asset in the post-season.
After all, we in Ottawa had a front row seat in seeing our talented Senators teams fall to their typically more gritty Leaf opponents in the late 90s and early 2000s.
As Captain of the team, he's leading his team in GWG (currently 5th in the NHL and more than either Matthews or Marner) and consistently steps in to protect smaller skilled teammates when the opposition takes liberties.
This is why some people voted for Tkachuk in the poll, while the majority voted for Marner.
I personally don't take offence if someone were to vote for Marner, because he's an All-Star and one of the best wingers in the league. The notion that it is criminally insulting not to vote for Marner is an unnecessary level of absurdity.
A few people have said that they like their guy, but would also appreciate the other guy on their team. I think that's the correct response in all of this.