Dekes For Days
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2018
- 22,091
- 16,633
In both, obviously.In the season or in the playoffs?
But keep acting like somebody who has never even played in the playoffs is a playoff legend. It's quite funny.
In both, obviously.In the season or in the playoffs?
Let me know if you still have a team in 10 years.Enjoy another year not winning the Cup.
Th Leafs are built for the regular season and not the playoffs.
In both, obviously.
But keep acting like somebody who has never even played in the playoffs is a playoff legend. It's quite funny.
Let me know if you still have a team in 10 years.
I'm not a fan of either team...but atleast they are making the playoffs![]()
Literally the whole time.When did I act in such a way?
All teams have wants and areas they can upgrade to increase their chances. The Leafs are no exception to this, but they don't need anything to win the cup. The team they already have is an elite, well-balanced team that is fully capable of doing that. Exchanging a better player for a worse player does not help anything.I'm responding to someone saying the Leafs don't need anything.
Yes it's relevant...one team is making the playoffs and the other isn't. I understand you have a younger team, but Toronto's main core is only a couple years older than yours. Your two teams will be fighting for playoff spots/matchups for the foreseeable future.They're at different times in their cycles... Toronto's window will close soon and they haven't got passed the first round...Ottawa's window hasn't opened yet..it's about to open..
So the comment you quoted still stands, and what you responded isn't as relevant as you think.
Literally the whole time.
All teams have wants and areas they can upgrade to increase their chances. The Leafs are no exception to this, but they don't need anything to win the cup. The team they already have is an elite, well-balanced team that is fully capable of doing that. Exchanging a better player for a worse player does not help anything.
Or the other way around.Yes it's relevant...one team is making the playoffs and the other isn't. I understand you have a younger team, but Toronto's main core is only a couple years older than yours. Your two teams will be fighting for playoff spots/matchups for the foreseeable future.
Like I said, I'm not a fan of either team, but one team is clearly ahead of the other right now, so before you start mocking Toronto's playoff abilities, your team needs to make the playoffs and prove they can do better with their current core.
Okay but Ottawa's current core has yet to make the playoffs. So again, before mocking Toronto's current core, your current core needs to prove they can also make the playoffs, which has yet to happen.Or the other way around.
The Leafs regular seasons are nice, but the sens have won many many playoff rounds since Toronto last won a round. They've went to the Cup finals and then the conference finals.
You could say, the onus is on the Leafs to prove that they can do better with their current core.
They still haven't surpassed the finals or conference finals.
See, you can flip that argument...or you can agree they're at different times in their cycles, and in the time the Leafs need to win the in playoffs, they haven't been able to. When Ottawa's turn was to win in the playoffs, they actually did. Now it's the Leafs turn, and they haven't. In the next few years we'll see if the sens can when it's their turn.
But like I said, our current core is not at that stage yet.Okay but Ottawa's current core has yet to make the playoffs. So again, before mocking Toronto's current core, your current core needs to prove they can also make the playoffs, which has yet to happen.
No, getting worse does not increase your chances. That fact does not change, regular season or playoffs.It could though, technically.
That's really not true. There is no "playoff build" and "regular season build". You seem to be mistaking and misattributing what causes lesser teams to sometimes go on runs or beat better teams over small samples.Sometimes, certain team builds are just better for the playoffs, even if they'll get you less regular season points.
It literally is. You're suggesting he's a better option in the playoffs (despite never even making the playoffs) than one of the best players in the game, based on absolutely nothing.And this isn't even trying to peg tkachuk as proven for the playoffs.
Lol @ thinking Tkachuk has better "character" than Marner, let alone that it would close the gap between them.And I'm not even knocking marner's character. I like his attitude. I just think tkachuk has elite level character.
Lol ok, so you haven't been watching hockey for years. Or else you would have seen countless examples of what I'm saying, example, Leafs beating the sens teams in the playoffs.No, getting worse does not increase your chances. That fact does not change, regular season or playoffs.
That's really not true. There is no "playoff build" and "regular season build". You seem to be mistaking and misattributing what causes lesser teams to sometimes go on runs or beat better teams over small samples.
It literally is. You're suggesting he's a better option in the playoffs (despite never even making the playoffs) than one of the best players in the game, based on absolutely nothing.
Lol @ thinking Tkachuk has better "character" than Marner, let alone that it would close the gap between them.
But like I said, our current core is not at that stage yet.
When Ottawa's last core was their turn to win in the playoffs, they won rounds. This is when Toronto was bottom of the league.
When Toronto's current core is their turn to win in the playoffs, they have yet to win a round. This is when Ottawa is at the bottom of the league.
You see how they're on opposite cycles?
Ottawa fans, which are there for all cores that come through, can absolutely talk smack about when it's their turn to win, they do win, and when it's the Leafs turn to win, they don't win.
Obviously we will see if that trend continues when Ottawas time to compete comes.
It's as if they're in a shootout and Ottawas shooter scored (their previous core) then Toronto's shooter (current core) went up and missed. Ottawas core is lining up and about to take their next shot. At this point, sens fans can be happy. It's only once they take their shot and miss that they can go "oh, now we're in the same boat as Toronto was" (missing their shot).
Let me know if you still have a team in 10 years.
Okay I'm not having a conversation about a metaphorical shootout between Ottawa and Toronto going through their different competition phases lol.
I'm taking Marner here.
Definitely one of the most insecure and hypocritical fanbases. I guess that's what being near bankruptcy and constantly at risk of losing your team does.It’s funny to see the goal posts moved so quickly on timing of the Sens current core. Go read all of the off-season winner threads from the summer. A bunch of Sens fans were adamant they were on par with the Leafs, ahead of Boston, were a lock to make the playoffs, etc. What happened to that?
I've been watching hockey for longer than you, kid.Lol ok, so you haven't been watching hockey for years. Or else you would have seen countless examples of what I'm saying, example, Leafs beating the sens teams in the playoffs.
Your GM has claimed a few teams to be ready for competing, only that has yet to happen. Like I said, Ottawa is a younger team, but your best players aren't as far in age compared to Toronto's as you are making it sound.I had to use an analogy because you didn't understand how teams could be at different points in their cycles with different expectations.
The shoutout analogy perfectly illustrates different different teams having their turn.
I had to use an analogy because you didn't understand how teams could be at different points in their cycles with different expectations.
The shoutout analogy perfectly illustrates different different teams having their turn.
It’s funny to see the goal posts moved so quickly on timing of the Sens current core. Go read all of the off-season winner threads from the summer. A bunch of Sens fans were adamant they were on par with the Leafs, ahead of Boston, were a lock to make the playoffs, etc. What happened to that?
They literally scored first in the shootout so that doesn't make any sense.Your GM has claimed a few teams to be ready for competing, only that has yet to happen. Like I said, Ottawa is a younger team, but your best players aren't as far in age compared to Toronto's as you are making it sound.
If you want to use your analogy:
Torono has been and will continue to shoot
Ottawa is trying to make it to the shootout
Fans of teams always predict greener.
Where were neutral fans predicting the sens? (So exclude sens fans that will predict high, and rivals fans that will predict low)
Would you not agree "just missing the playoffs" was the most common prediction?
They're what, 6 points out? They're doing what is expected.
They literally scored first in the shootout so that doesn't make any sense.
If we're just going to randomly talk about decades ago for no apparent reason, the Leafs were scoring in this "shootout" before Ottawa even existed.They literally scored first in the shootout so that doesn't make any sense.
I said could be a difference, not will.I've been watching hockey for longer than you, kid.
There are examples of better teams losing to lesser teams over a small sample, but not for the reasons you seem to think.
And whatever reason you think, you certainly can't claim somebody who has never even played in the playoffs to be a difference maker for the playoffs anyway.
What? When did I say that?Right, so you just admitted the fanbase moved the goal posts. So again, how are they at the beginning of their cycle? Go and re read the off-season threads. Just missing the playoffs was not the most common prediction. It was that they were better than Boston and Toronto.