Dekes For Days
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2018
- 22,091
- 16,633
There's nothing to be nuanced about. It's undeniably, straight up cherry picking, and a bad representation of what those players are expected to bring, by your own admission.No. Go look at "nuanced" now.
Okay, so you agree that there is a significant offensive gap between them? Because it's sure taken you a while to admit it."Closing the gap offensively" doesn't mean 9 pts is "insignificant"
It's not odd logic at all. It's literally just logic. You don't get random bonus points for your attributes or play style. You get credit for what you do with it, that has meaningful impact for the team.Uh... very odd logic.
OP creates the thread and posts their stats early in the season when their point pace creates a very misleading picture, and then tells everybody to ignore everything outside of this season.Have you re-opened the first post of this thread at least once? OP never talked about pace, yet you keep repeating.
I think you can see what the purpose here was, whether you choose to admit it or not.
Well Tkachuk didn't maintain that pace, and Marner increased his, and you're still here arguing against Marner being better, so it is a bit hard to understand what you're doing here.It's obvious that the discussion only happens IF Tkachuk keeps up with Marner production this season... If it doesn't happen, then it's still Marner by a significant margin so this discussion wouldn't be needed. Is it that hard to understand?
You keep acknowledging that it's obviously Marner, and then arguing against anybody that says it's obviously Marner.
But there's still a significant gap, by your own admission, and he gets beat everywhere else. Until he's at least closed the gap, there's no discussion to even be had, so who cares if he's slightly narrowed it?Highlighted is exactly what "closing the gap" means.
There's been a pandemic, in case you hadn't noticed.Pace is nice and everything but Marner never scored more than 97 pts.
Your whole argument is literally based on pace that Tkachuk has maintained for far less time.
You were acting like it was crazy for Marner to hit a point total that he paced closed to just last season.
Either way, you don't need 30 point separation to have a significant offensive gap.
This is like the 5th time you've said this in one post, when the only one experiencing that is you.Again, your reading problems...
Literally every time the defensive difference gets pointed out, you go on and on about coaching and teams and arbitrarily giving credit to Tkachuk for random things.I NEVER said what you think I have said. I am saying coaching plays a pretty big part though.
Is it that hard to just admit that Marner is much better defensively?
Because 5v5 is a better representation of their actual defensive abilities, which is why that is what is always used. It's a consistent, equal game state, whereas ES has a lot of differing game states that fall under it and are experienced by teams and players in different amounts, which can skew the numbers - some of which don't even feature equal skaters like empty net situations.Ok but I looked at Even Strength (which includes 5v5), what is the point of only look at 5v5 then?
Because it is elite. He's one of the best PKers in the league.And why is Marner PK being qualified as Elite?
Glad we can agree that Marner is the better player. It's obviously AINEC, but I don't really care how close you think it is.Yes Marner is still the better overall player but the AINEC you've been going on with is what is ridiculous.
Not a chance. Better players get paid more. That doesn't mean you trade them for worse players.Considering contracts, I think Dubas would pull the trigger on a 1 for 1 trade