:
facepalm:
What facepalm? Look at yr avatar, then at yourself in the mirror. LOL
"I can perfectly read in 3 langages, thank you"
If you can manage English well enough, that will suffice.
"The problem is what I am reading is non sense."
That is YOUR
opinion.
It is repudiated by actual facts I presented (vjz., Kreider still looks good over next 3-5 years, at nyr team friendly price = great value, etc.), which are accurate.
Your willful choice to ignore those facts does not negate and undo what I said, even tho you would obv like that.
"Just the way you structure your sentences is pretty telling."
I am a professional wordsmith who sidelines as a composer-lyricist.
If I elect to take artistic license with how I structure my phrasing
just so I can add emphasis
I freaking will.
"lol "I trust" that you have no freaking idea about what you're talking about"
bern is a champion of free speech and the exchange of ideas
hence I am tolerant
but you need to take care when you say I "have no freaking idea..."; I have a track record* in close to real time about R moves and player appraisals, and they are usually correct.
{* includes but is not limited to, should have dealt Buch much earlier when he had term, should not have done rentals, etc. etc., etc}
"and you're just an insufferable homer"
again, your opinion and you have the right to be wrong.
"
so change your tune and stop talking to me this way"
watch it, nobody tells bern what to do
"fool."
The more you rant
the more you rave
makes you sound less like a king
and more like a knave.
...................although in this particular instance, you may be presenting yourself as playing the fool.
"Oh and Kreider was really awful this afternoon, giftwrapped the Habs a come back in the game."
Wow, that you feel the need to say something like that intended to be hurtful is telling.
It is documented Kreider was out coupla games had back/related issues.
No prob if he takes another few off to fully recover.
He is still a star, one your team and most of the league's clubs can use/covet, and guess what?
YOU CAN'T HAVE HIM
"This needs to be emphasized to show how delusional this poster is"
{this is relative to your quote of my statement: "should only be dealt if it was exceptional return long term"}
It is you, not I, who appear delusional here.
Kreider's production + cost = great value, so why should I not say no unless it is too good to turn down, and not just short term.
"The return is an unicorn power forward who is 8 years younger and destroys Kreider both in raw and advanced stats but the guy needs an "
exceptional return long term""
The above is the misleading, disingenuous statement of a hypocrite.
1. Return is not for Kreider straight up 1:1, it is for CK + KK. As I noted Kakko has signif upside still and should be kept.
That you do not acknowledge this is a reflection on you, and it is a bad image.
2. That aside, cap does not entertain us acquiring BT b'c Rs did not listen to bern, have handed out NMCs like candy, and now it is biting up the ass. Rs CAN NOT typically add another actual or projected long term salary without moving Zib, Trouba or Fox -- and that does not include Shesty.
Again, Kreider is a hair below 6.5 if I remember and if he stays, is likely to go 1 yr at a time for a team friendly 5-ish m per, imo. So he is not really part of the structural cap that has to be managed going forward.
-----------------------------------
You've been bad Santa, and you know it.
Put yourself on the naughty list and don't waste bern's time again.