Fact is he shouldn’t have needed that “new” information to can Dubas. All the evidence was already there
Play devil's advocate for a moment...
Dubas had a fantastic trade deadline. And, that we finally got past the first round and the first round with Tampa was validating.
Prior to that we have had two suspicious playoffs failures -- I'm referencing Columbus and Montreal. Montreal especially. Certainly could have fired him then and there and Keefe with him. Granted, we have faced multiple Stanley Cup champions as a young team. There's a distinction that merits patience there.
But playing devil's advocate, Shanahan holds off owing to certain external circumstances and provides stability in the organization and allows a young core room to fail.
Now, we're still a mid-career core four. Shanahan sees two rounds for the first time and sees Florida manhandle Carolina. Given the regular season successes, the age of the team, the possibility of that core continuing on past Tavares albatross contract...I can see why Shanahan saw merit in keeping this glacial development of Dubas going.
All of that said, Dubas' opportunism isn't worth the tossed Tim Horton's cup Shanahan pitched post-firing. Shanahan was absolutely right then and I think his reasoning, if the above approaches it, has always been sound.
It doesn't feel like it at times, but there are too many good things Shanahan's brought that we overlook in a kind of arrogant, effortless manner.
I've said previously that my sense is the one thing Shanahan wanted to establish as a part of Toronto's new culture along with success was/is constancy. That's a foundational stone. And the only way that that part of the equation is laid is over time. Through good times and bad and worse, through confounding times.
Perhaps Treliving's tenure's the beginning of some semblance of much needed balance and maturity and accountability. And maybe Shanahan sees something that his experience provides and something ours can't.