Brad Treliving is doing a great job.

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
The forwards are an amazing base? You have Knies penciled in as your top line winger (had played 5 games in the NHL at that point), Robertson still yet to prove if he is an NHL player and often injured.
Not going to bother talking about Lafferty, 4 of your bottom 6 are not NHL players (McMann currently is in NHL).

The D hasn't been changed much, dealing with injuries to Lil and Timmins.

Base? Yes.

That is an amazing base to work with.

When we have a fully healthy team, the only signings playing are

2LW, 3C, 4LW, and 4C.

Unless you think the team is terrible, he was given an amazing base.

No D, G, and barely any impact Fs have been signed, this is the same team as last year.

Your 8 UFAs needed to be signed were filled with 4 UFAs... real tough work... thanks for the prospects Dubas.
 
The forwards are an amazing base? You have Knies penciled in as your top line winger (had played 5 games in the NHL at that point), Robertson still yet to prove if he is an NHL player and often injured.
Not going to bother talking about Lafferty, 4 of your bottom 6 are not NHL players (McMann currently is in NHL).

The D hasn't been changed much, dealing with injuries to Lil and Timmins.

He didn't post a roster lineup, just players signed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: banks
do you want to come back to leafs d in 2020?

rielly- tyson " klinberg 2.0" barrie
Muzzin-Holl
dermott-Ceci

if you dont consider this D like a massive hole...it was a MASSIVE HOLE because this healthy is even with all leafs actual injuries so imagine when Muzzin get injured in playoff...
Barrie had flaws, but he was much better than Klingberg. Just because your defense isn't a perfect mix, that doesn't mean you left a massive hole. At that point, it was actually the Leaf's best season defensively since at least 2008, as we added a defensive defenseman and some forwards with a defensive conscience in the offseason to help supplement the offensive replacement for Gardiner (a concept Treliving didn't seem to get). It wasn't perfect, since Dubas took over one of the worst defensive teams in the league, but it was addressed in the offseason and there were improvements. And more relevant to the discussion, we didn't even trade assets at the deadline that season.
 
He didn't post a roster lineup, just players signed.
Yes, and I gave context as the positions that need to be filled. My issue was calling it an amazing forward base when you need to sign: 2 top 6 left wingers (unless you wanted to throw Knies into one of those positions based on his limited NHL experience and have no insurance in the event he isn't able to handle that role right away), a 3rd and 4th line Center, 3rd line winger.

In my books, some of those positions would be considered "glaring holes" in the lineup.
 
Yes, and I gave context as the positions that need to be filled. My issue was calling it an amazing forward base when you need to sign: 2 top 6 left wingers (unless you wanted to throw Knies into one of those positions based on his limited NHL experience and have no insurance in the event he isn't able to handle that role right away), a 3rd and 4th line Center, 3rd line winger.

In my books, some of those positions would be considered "glaring holes" in the lineup.

Well if his goal was to sign 1LW, 2LW, 3C, 3LW, and 4C he failed.

He signed 2LW, 3C, 4LW, 4C.

So he either failed, or Dubas left more than you care to admit.
 
A move that just didn't make any sense at the time, and is worse now. Gus put up 38 points in 61 games for Washington, and four points in nine games with us... all while being a positive player.

The Klingberg signing looked bad at the time, and is worse now.
he barely got in the lineup with us and Wash who knew him much better than us added a 1st to him to get a similar but younger player , so good for him for having a good season so far but still dosen't mean we should have had high expectations for him and brought him back

we also have a younger similar player in Timmins so that also probably played a role in letting him walk
 
Base? Yes.

That is an amazing base to work with.

When we have a fully healthy team, the only signings playing are

2LW, 3C, 4LW, and 4C.

Unless you think the team is terrible, he was given an amazing base.

No D, G, and barely any impact Fs have been signed, this is the same team as last year.

Your 8 UFAs needed to be signed were filled with 4 UFAs... real tough work... thanks for the prospects Dubas.

You realize this sort of argument could have also been made for Dubas when he inherited the team, right? Not sure why anyone is arguing anyways, we have a team that is 10-5 right now. Some of you need to remember the good ol' days of Phaneuf, salute-gate, Bozak as our 1C, etc., to comprehend what a great position we've been in the last 7 years, regardless of management.

Tre is doing as good a job as Dubas, objectively. The team has had a very similar start to the year in comparison with Dubas' teams, and is on a similar trajectory in terms of Pts%. Why don't we all just buckle up and enjoy the show?
 
Well if his goal was to sign 1LW, 2LW, 3C, 3LW, and 4C he failed.

He signed 2LW, 3C, 4LW, 4C.

So he either failed, or Dubas left more than you care to admit.
I think Domi was signed as top 6 insurance for Knies in the event he looked like he would struggle in that position (luckily Knies looks good playing in that role already in his young career.

I agree, Tre failed in brining in a 3rd line C (during the off-season) as I think Domi is better off on the wing. Lets see if the GM address the C position during the season.
 
Tre took over a month before free agency, with a lot of work to do, plus all three amigos contracts to worry about. Yeah Dubie left a steaming turd.
Treliving took over a month before free agency, but he was also an active GM the entire time prior. This idea that he had to start from scratch on everything once coming here is hilarious. He didn't have three amigo contracts to deal with. He had two, and only did anything with one. Treliving had it made. Dubas handed him a top tier team, with all of the most important players signed, a bunch of cap space and available roster spots to make his mark on the team's depth, a solid prospect pool with multiple NHL-ready ELCs, and a wide range of options and paths. And so far, all of the best parts of the team are things Treliving inherited, and all of the worst parts of the team are things Treliving did.
Gus is what he is
Yeah. A player with the identified attributes, that was already on our team, that would have been a lot better than Klingberg.
 
Well it wasn’t your post I was responding to, so maybe start with that

You may be a little unfamiliar, but if you're trying to talk to one person, what you're looking for is the DM functionality, let me know if you need assistance.

I think Domi was signed as top 6 insurance for Knies in the event he looked like he would struggle in that position (luckily Knies looks good playing in that role already in his young career.

I agree, Tre failed in brining in a 3rd line C (during the off-season) as I think Domi is better off on the wing. Lets see if the GM address the C position during the season.

I like most of Treliving's moves this offseason, I just don't understand what people are saying when they say he had a lot of work to do... during free agency if you just told someone "Pick the biggest names you see" they would have signed the exact same players...

His biggest hurdle was Nylander/Matthews, but that could have been done after free agency.

During free agency, he had a few holes to fill, but they weren't big ones.
 
Treliving took over a month before free agency, but he was also an active GM the entire time prior. This idea that he had to start from scratch on everything once coming here is hilarious. He didn't have three amigo contracts to deal with. He had two, and only did anything with one. Treliving had it made. Dubas handed him a top tier team, with all of the most important players signed, a bunch of cap space and available roster spots to make his mark on the team's depth, a solid prospect pool with multiple NHL-ready ELCs, and a wide range of options and paths. And so far, all of the best parts of the team are things Treliving inherited, and all of the worst parts of the team are things Treliving did.

Yeah. A player with the identified attributes, that was already on our team, that would have been a lot better than Klingberg.
Whatever, this has been addressed a million times on here, but you don’t seem to comprehend just about anything
 
he barely got in the lineup with us and Wash who knew him much better than us added a 1st to him to get a similar but younger player , so good for him for having a good season so far but still dosen't mean we should have had high expectations for him and brought him back

we also have a younger similar player in Timmins so that also probably played a role in letting him walk

Ya.. I don't get why Washington moved on from him, except maybe they believe Sandin has more upside. Sure, we didn't play him much... but the point was more that there were other options than Klingberg, who was clearly a player who wasn't very good, whom Dallas, Anaheim and Minnesota also chose to let walk. It's not that I'm a huge Gus fan, just that there were cheaper options than Klingberg, who at the time of the signing it looked bad, and now it's worse.

Anyway, let's see how Tre fixes this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: usernamezrhardtodo
Barrie had flaws, but he was much better than Klingberg. Just because your defense isn't a perfect mix, that doesn't mean you left a massive hole. At that point, it was actually the Leaf's best season defensively since at least 2008, as we added a defensive defenseman and some forwards with a defensive conscience in the offseason to help supplement the offensive replacement for Gardiner (a concept Treliving didn't seem to get). It wasn't perfect, since Dubas took over one of the worst defensive teams in the league, but it was addressed in the offseason and there were improvements. And more relevant to the discussion, we didn't even trade assets at the deadline that season.
sorry barrie was totally trash, he had been 100 % healthy all year long and leafs gave up 71 in 70 when he was in the ice. #2 amount every leafs D was Muzzin at 50...the only d who had been able to make look barrie okay was rielly... Klinberg get injured in pre-season and still played with injury and pain 14 game he llayed and was on the ice 16 in 14 game...but yes for sure Barrie was so much better defensivly... yeah youre right ( sarcasm)

the fact leafs had been better is keefe effect... they move off babcock system with streche pass to a system where foward had to reduce space between D and foward and that way giving more help to D to make their job.
 
Ya.. I don't get why Washington moved on from him, except maybe they believe Sandin has more upside. Sure, we didn't play him much... but the point was more that there were other options than Klingberg, who was clearly a player who wasn't very good, whom Dallas, Anaheim and Minnesota also chose to let walk. It's not that I'm a huge Gus fan, just that there were cheaper options than Klingberg, who at the time of the signing it looked bad, and now it's worse.

Anyway, let's see how Tre fixes this.
guys like Kling who've had recent success will always have teams who will take a chance on them getting back to close to their previous level

if Kling doesn't go on ltir but his health doesn't allow him to up his play he'll be easy to move without an add to get a replacement since he's an ufa and most teams know they'll have to get cap back when there selling off players , he's also owed peanuts in actual salary

the difficult part is if there's a D out there that fills our needs and if we have enough to acquire them without moving Cowan
 
So when Dubas trades to add to the roster its because hes improving it, not because he left the team with glaring weaknesses from the summer before. But if Tre does it, hes not improving it and just filling in holes he left from the summer.
I'm not really sure how you don't see the difference between improving a top team at the deadline as you approach the playoffs, and making an early season trade to fix a mistake you made in the offseason. One is loading up into the positives. The other is just getting out of the negative back to 0.
 
sorry barrie was totally trash, he had been 100 % healthy all year long and leafs gave up 71 in 70 when he was in the ice. #2 amount every leafs D was Muzzin at 50...
Barrie was not trash. He had flaws, Babcock messed with him, and he didn't end up meshing with many partners here, but he was way better than Klingberg, and steps were taken in the offseason to insulate him. He stepped up big when the rest of the defense got decimated with injury that year.

It's bad enough that you're evaluating skater defense by goals against, but your statement is also wildly misleading. The gap in goals against is because Barrie played all of the games (while being forced into way more responsibility than he should have been to boot), while the rest of our top defensemen spent significant portions injured and not playing. Of course he's going to have more goals against than people playing 20 less games.

For the record, Barrie had an xGA/60 of 2.59, in situations beyond his normal responsibilities. Klingberg had an xGA/60 of 3.48, while being massively sheltered.
 
Barrie was not trash. He had flaws, Babcock messed with him, and he didn't end up meshing with many partners here, but he was way better than Klingberg, and steps were taken in the offseason to insulate him. He stepped up big when the rest of the defense got decimated with injury that year.

It's bad enough that you're evaluating skater defense by goals against, but your statement is also wildly misleading. The gap in goals against is because Barrie played all of the games (while being forced into way more responsibility than he should have been to boot), while the rest of our top defensemen spent significant portions injured and not playing. Of course he's going to have more goals against than people playing 20 less games.


the ice time average was like 2 minute of difference at 5v5 and no he didn't had more responsabilities. he was just playing majority of season with leafs top 2 best (Muzzin+ rielly) D to look fine vs klinberg who played with 4/5/6/7/8th D with pratically the same responsabilities...
 

"The trade came at a time when COVID-19 was imposing all sorts of limitations on teams and may have prevented the Leafs from being able to perform a proper medical check on Foligno prior to completing the trade. They were relying solely on the information that Jarmo Kekalainen had provided them with. It would be nice to be able to take another GM at his word, but it would appear as though Dubas has learned his lesson as he hasn't paid a premium for a player at the deadline since. Even this summer, Dubas had the Leafs' medical staff closely examine Matt Murray to ensure that he was 100% recovered from his concussion issues before pulling the trigger on a deal for the 28-year-old netminder.

Still, it's a bit frustrating to know that Foligno and Kekalainen basically lied to the Leafs and got away with it entirely unchecked."

Looks like you aren't telling the truth...

It'd be nice to have a conversation about the facts.
Actually both are wrong. Foligno was healthy before coming to Toronto. He then had multiple weeks in quarantine to clear up any bumps and bruises. He was very good in the first few games with us, playing decent minutes in a top 6 role, and going PPG. He got a debilitating injury in the next game, and struggled from there.

The site you're referencing seems to be taking a comment about how the Leafs helped Foligno work through the injury he experienced with us, to still be able to play some games for us after it happened, and for some reason thinking he's talking about something else.
 
the ice time average was like 2 minute of difference at 5v5 and no he didn't had more responsabilities.
I'm not talking about the ice time average. I'm talking about the number of games. You took total goals against (which is bad enough) and then compared it to players that played ~20 games less than him, in order to misrepresent him and his defense. Of course somebody with 70 games is going to have more total goals against than somebody with 47 games.

And yes, he took on a lot of responsibility during the period of time when we had the majority of our defense out with injury that year. Klingberg has been one of the most sheltered players in the league, and was still much worse.
 
If the previous management would have used Gustafsson last year in the playoffs, we're probably sitting here as Champions. But no, no, they couldn't keep their pet project Holl out for long.

Thanks Kyle.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ACC1224 and hotpaws

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad