IPS
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2017
- 16,594
- 27,384
Notbias trying to explain how Klingberg and Reaves were horrible signings but Mrazek, Ritchie and Murray were totally fine.:
We have a 9th D making 4.1 and a 15th forward making 1.3... there is your 4.5 for a 6D for one year. He had options.
It is hard when so many people are defending him... you have some homers saying "who could have known" about Huberdeau but they also crucify the Tavares signing... those seem like fans of the person.
So if signing Mrazek was a bad move, which clearly it was from day one, how can dropping spots in a draft to get rid of him be a good trade? Makes no senseIs reading hard for some people here?
LTIR I said no harm.
13 spots is probably more than we are moving down for Klingberg, but regardless, I said bad signing for Mrazek, the trade was good.
If Klingberg is moved like Ritchie was, for example, I don't care, that was essentially 0 picks.
My point is the signing for Mrazek was bad, but the move was not.
We will see how the bad signing of Klingberg is handled.
Murray trade is good in hindsight now.
So if signing Mrazek was a bad move, which clearly it was from day one, how can dropping spots in a draft to get rid of him be a good trade? Makes no sense
It would have cost any other GM much, much more. If Dubas was good at one thing, it was fixing his mistakes. Comes with experience.So if signing Mrazek was a bad move, which clearly it was from day one, how can dropping spots in a draft to get rid of him be a good trade? Makes no sense
do you realize than klinberg didn't played a single regular season game healthy... What you saw was a injured Klinberg who was unable to move the way he want on the ice...
Are you saying he's not injured?So we signed and played an unhealthy player, who hasn't been good for a couple of years? And this is an issue from a surgery back in 2015? But he was fully capable of moving the way he wants on the ice, for YEARS after that? I mean... he's suddenly not healthy after playing like crap.... I mean, that completely passes the sniff test. He'll be on LTIR soon, and that will be the end of his season. He's being sent to Robidas Island, because he isn't good, and they found an excuse to send him there... it's so transparent that it's ridiculous.
It would have cost any other GM much, much more. If Dubas was good at one thing, it was fixing his mistakes. Comes with experience.
Are you saying he's not injured?
I really, really doubt they'd be able to sneak that one through. There was quite a lot of crying around the league when the Leafs were doing borderline cap moves in years prior. Don't think you want that kind of attention if you were trying to so something illegal with Klingberg on the LTIR.So we signed and played an unhealthy player, who hasn't been good for a couple of years? And this is an issue from a surgery back in 2015? But he was fully capable of moving the way he wants on the ice, for YEARS after that? I mean... he's suddenly not healthy after playing like crap.... I mean, that completely passes the sniff test. He'll be on LTIR soon, and that will be the end of his season. He's being sent to Robidas Island, because he isn't good, and they found an excuse to send him there... it's so transparent that it's ridiculous.
Wasn't he also emotional in an interview in Sweden about possibly not playing too? There's gotta be an injury there.Are you saying he's not injured?
The trade action was only possible because they signed him in the first place. Trading down picks to clear up cap space that should never had needed clearing is a bad trade any day of the week.The trade was cap space for a pick... the signing and the trade are two different actions... how are certain concepts so hard to understand?
The trade was much less than most expected and they still got their guy, that is good.
I never suggested it was illegal. I'm saying whatever the "injury" is... it's been there for years. It's just he's now crap, and they are using that "injury" as an excuse.I really, really doubt they'd be able to sneak that one through. There was quite a lot of crying around the league when the Leafs were doing borderline cap moves in years prior. Don't think you want that kind of attention if you were trying to so something illegal with Klingberg on the LTIR.
Then again crazier things have happened.
Wasn't he also emotional in an interview in Sweden about possibly not playing too? There's gotta be an injury there.
It sounds to me like this has been an issue for most of his career, but has managed it. He obviously aggravated it and can’t play at this level. Yeah he sucked, but I’m sure this injury just magnified itSo we signed and played an unhealthy player, who hasn't been good for a couple of years? And this is an issue from a surgery back in 2015? But he was fully capable of moving the way he wants on the ice, for YEARS after that? I mean... he's suddenly not healthy after playing like crap.... I mean, that completely passes the sniff test. He'll be on LTIR soon, and that will be the end of his season. He's being sent to Robidas Island, because he isn't good, and they found an excuse to send him there... it's so transparent that it's ridiculous.
It sounds to me like this has been an issue for most of his career, but has managed it. He obviously aggravated it and can’t play at this level. Yeah he sucked, but I’m sure this injury just magnified it
So we signed and played an unhealthy player, who hasn't been good for a couple of years? And this is an issue from a surgery back in 2015? But he was fully capable of moving the way he wants on the ice, for YEARS after that? I mean... he's suddenly not healthy after playing like crap.... I mean, that completely passes the sniff test. He'll be on LTIR soon, and that will be the end of his season. He's being sent to Robidas Island, because he isn't good, and they found an excuse to send him there... it's so transparent that it's ridiculous.
One move costed us a 1st + for 11 games of service. The other costed us cap space that looks likely to be filled at some point this season whenever they decide to make a move to help on D.He's been this bad for a couple of years...
The Foligno for a 1st crowd should be losing it for signing an already injured player.
Not even in the same stratosphereHe's been this bad for a couple of years...
The Foligno for a 1st crowd should be losing it for signing an already injured player.
If he played well he was probably healthy. I don't see any benefit to the player to go on LTIR if it wasn't necessary.I'm sure there is something... just enough to use LTIR. If he had played well, he'd still be playing though, whatever that "injury" is. Sort of like the allergy issue... there probably was always an allergy issue...
Why even play the lame game, the two moves have no real common thread? Foligno was damaged goods, he was out before the trade and people in Columbus said he wasn’t fully healed. Klingberg has played for years with this issue, obviously something changed a couple weeks ago. Klingberg played out the string last year and playoffs, he was fine. I guess Dubas shouldn’t have signed Karlsson, what with his issues? I mean you can play these silly games all year. Some do…One move costed us a 1st + for 11 games of service. The other costed us cap space that looks likely to be filled at some point this season whenever they decide to make a move to help on D.
Do you not see the difference? Yes the Klingberg signing was bad, but its not like we used a 1st + to acquire him...
he never be a great player defensive side but he never be as worst...if hebwould play that way playing in a top 3 in Dallas, they're no chance they would reached the final... sorry he was looking like an AHL 3rd pair dman
if he was playing exwmple at 70%, sure their weakness will become even bigger and his strenght smaller
He was this bad last year too.
he got better at fixing mistakes , can't say better than other GM's but what he got better at was trying to make it look like he minimized the damage of his f*** upsIt would have cost any other GM much, much more. If Dubas was good at one thing, it was fixing his mistakes. Comes with experience.
That's helpful to the discussion. Some far, I see rational posters talking about the moves that Tre has made since being the GM of the Toronto Maple Leafs. A few posters want to bring up his history as the GM of the Calgary Flames, seemingly those posters don't like when countered with the moves of the previous GM of the Toronto Maple Leafs.You're all being idiots. Way too much burying of heads in the sand and forced narratives just to appear right