Brad Treliving is doing a great job.

GoonieFace

Registered User
Jun 24, 2013
8,003
8,304
The Matrix
View attachment 762759

Over the course of the last 5 seasons combined Morgan Rielly is 15th in points among Dmen and Klingberg is #24. While Rielly had 24 goals vs Klingberg 29.

Those totals by Rielly earned him a 8 year $60 mil contract with an average of $7.5 mil AAV. While Klingberg turned down a massive offer before free agency. Dallas Stars had offered Klingberg an 8 year deal at at $7 million AAV earlier in the year, but Klingberg’s camp wanted closer to eight years, but at $8 million.

View attachment 762756

The Leafs ended up taking a 1 year flyer at $4.15 mil on a player comparable to their own Top scoring Dman after he came off a UFA season of 67 games 10 goals and 33 points compared to Morgan Rielly of 65 games 4 goals and 41 points. Klingberg has taken Rielly's spot on the #1PP in hopes that Leafs will have a 2nd offensive Dman capable of 50-60 points this season.

That is your true comparable of what Treliving attempted in hopes of addressing a Leafs dcore/defense that finished 29th overall in offense from the defense.
It’s a low risk, high reward signing. Not sure why people can’t understand that
 

Gallagbi

Formerly Eazy_B97
Jul 5, 2005
49,519
12,104
View attachment 762759

Over the course of the last 5 seasons combined Morgan Rielly is 15th in points among Dmen and Klingberg is #24. While Rielly had 24 goals vs Klingberg 29.

Those totals by Rielly earned him a 8 year $60 mil contract with an average of $7.5 mil AAV. While Klingberg turned down a massive offer before free agency. Dallas Stars had offered Klingberg an 8 year deal at at $7 million AAV earlier in the year, but Klingberg’s camp wanted closer to eight years, but at $8 million.

View attachment 762756

The Leafs ended up taking a 1 year flyer at $4.15 mil on a player comparable to their own Top scoring Dman after he came off a UFA season of 67 games 10 goals and 33 points compared to Morgan Rielly of 65 games 4 goals and 41 points. Klingberg has taken Rielly's spot on the #1PP in hopes that Leafs will have a 2nd offensive Dman capable of 50-60 points this season.

That is your true comparable of what Treliving attempted in hopes of addressing a Leafs dcore/defense that finished 29th overall in offense from the defense.
This is a really good point. We brought in a less productive D and are now force feeding minutes to justify the money he being paid in hopes he can regain his form from 3-5 years ago. It may not be smart, but it does seem to be what we're seeing.
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,831
13,533
Leafs Home Board
It’s a low risk, high reward signing. Not sure why people can’t understand that
Unlike our previous GM there will be no need to deal away top draft picks to get out of a UFA signing from the Klingberg contract as BT limited the risk/reward to just this current season., If it works out the Leafs have added another top 24 overall scoring dman, and if not they simply walk away no harm no foul.

With all the offensive forwards on the Leafs BT is hoping he has added another 50-60 point top 4 dman for a discount $4.15 mil unlike where Leafs are paying TJ Brodie $5 mil AAV to get 2 goals and 14 points. When your new GM inherits a Dcore/Defense that finished 29th of 32 NHL teams in offense from the defense what is he expected to do?

Look at Leafs playoff goal scoring from the defense last year that BT inherited one of the oldest most ineffective. BRUTAL !!!!

1699108431426.png


Brodie + McCabe + Gio + Holl = $10 mil AAV with Zero goals and -24 +/- combined.

What do the Leafs have to lose by gambling on Klingberg ?
 
Last edited:

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,427
16,120
If it works out the Leafs have added another top 24 overall scoring dman, and if not they simply walk away no harm no foul.
Signing a bad player and tanking a season doesn't seem like no harm no foul.
unlike where Leafs are paying TJ Brodie $5 mil AAV to get 2 goals and 14 points.
They aren't paying Brodie to produce points. They're paying their defenseman Brodie to play defense, and he's been one of the best in the league at it.
For somebody who repeatedly makes the false claim that "defense wins championships", you seem to be brushing over the primary job of defensemen quite a bit.
When your new GM inherits a Dcore/Defense that finished 29th of 32 NHL teams in offense from the defense what is he expected to do?
When your new GM inherits a good defensive team, he is expected to not completely destroy that in one offseason.
 

TheRumble

Registered User
Feb 19, 2009
1,465
2,287
Signing a bad player and tanking a season doesn't seem like no harm no foul.

They aren't paying Brodie to produce points. They're paying their defenseman Brodie to play defense, and he's been one of the best in the league at it.
For somebody who repeatedly makes the false claim that "defense wins championships", you seem to be brushing over the primary job of defensemen quite a bit.

When your new GM inherits a good defensive team, he is expected to not completely destroy that in one offseason.

Mess is he guy who tried to argue with me that Jack Campbell was a good goalie, our defense just let him down. I almost never read his posts anymore after that.

In this thread he's glossing over the concept of the "contract year" phenomenon. Klingberg signed a 1 year deal with Anaheim last year in order to maximize his long term value on his next deal and failed. That's a red flag.

Gustafsson on the other hand only got $825k for a pretty good season all things considered.
 
Last edited:

Jimmy Firecracker

Backcheck, Forecheck, Paycheque.
Mar 30, 2010
37,684
39,200
Mississauga
Wanted to be optimistic but he’s built an absolute dumpster fire of a team. Wasted a ton of cap space on completely useless players. Team has zero identity and the strengths we’ve had in years past are nonexistent now. Nice going Pizza Boy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hullsy47

Tairy Greene

Registered User
Feb 2, 2020
786
651
It seems we are going to run into the same problems with Brad that we did with Dubas. We're going to have to burn a ton of Picks/prospects to plug holes at the deadline.
 
Last edited:

hullsy47

Registered User
Dec 7, 2005
6,570
1,213
Trev’s roster construction for the forward group seems is really off. No chemistry in the bottom 6.
This team is broken .something with the chemistry is off
My guess is the new players brought in are not buying in
 

hullsy47

Registered User
Dec 7, 2005
6,570
1,213
Wanted to be optimistic but he’s built an absolute dumpster fire of a team. Wasted a ton of cap space on completely useless players. Team has zero identity and the strengths we’ve had in years past are nonexistent now. Nice going Pizza Boy.
Boy if MSLE ever wanted to flex its corporate wealth
Fire the whole Chebang
Veteran teams usually know their identity
Tye leafs identity is "pay everybody and screw your fan base"
 

Leafidelity

Existentially Drifting
Apr 6, 2008
38,234
8,636
Downtown Canada
The only reason the Core 4 era has lasted this long is because Dubas was able to sign cheap quality UFAs almost yearly. I dont know if he could have done better this offseason, but the jig is certainly up with Treliving now.

Its probably time for a step back and major shakeup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: usernamezrhardtodo

Funk21

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,392
1,899
Toronto
I and half the fan base could have done a better job on the offseason.

Didn’t need Klingberg
Shouldn’t have signed Reeves
Keefe has never out coached any team in the playoffs

He ran the Flames into the ground, had no pulse on the team and kept running a coach that the entire team hated. He let a massive star walk for free but redeemed himself with the Thachuk deal. It hasn’t worked out as well as originally believed but that was decent bit of GMing. The Monahan deal looks like a bigger disaster every day. Cost them a first and likely to be traded at the TDL for another first.
 

Jacquestrapless

Registered User
Jun 5, 2011
3,132
2,581
Mississauga
Honestly, the biggest gaffe so far is Kampf.

If this season goes south, they could at least offload the rentals for some futures.

Kampf @ $2.4m for the next several years is no bueno man
 

cyris

On a Soma Holiday
Dec 6, 2008
17,030
4,859
3rd Planet From Sun.
Honestly, the biggest gaffe so far is Kampf.

If this season goes south, they could at least offload the rentals for some futures.

Kampf @ $2.4m for the next several years is no bueno man
I even like Kampf as a 4th line centre when he isn’t trying to carry a useless plug like Reeves. But there was no reason to give him that term when we had Holmberg ready to fill that same roll for nearly leaf minimum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacquestrapless

TheRumble

Registered User
Feb 19, 2009
1,465
2,287
Just to reiterate my stance here:

The Leafs made the very unusual move of firing their GM in the off season despite him putting together a string of very good seasons.

The new GM thought we wre close to contention and were only a few pieces away so he brought in four new guys that he felt could add those missing parts. Whether he's right or wrong, we'll have the rest of the season to judge that.

But all GMs should get 1 full season (currently underway) and 1 full off season so I'm gonna continue to preach that as how Brad should be judged. He'll have $25+ million in cap space to work with in the off season and a full sleight of draft picks - we have a pick in every round of the 24 draft except for the 2nd. He can make moves that will set the team up long term. His decisions around Nylander and Marner will largely determine his legacy here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devonator

Jimmy Firecracker

Backcheck, Forecheck, Paycheque.
Mar 30, 2010
37,684
39,200
Mississauga
The July 1st free agent signings predictably are the worst ones. Just spent money for no good reason. Re-signing Kampf was a stupid panic move because O’Reilly spurned us and now he’s got no place on this team.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad