Brad Treliving is doing a great job.

34

Registered User
Mar 26, 2010
21,869
9,774
I agree, we have to sign Nylander and he’ll be closer to 50 goals than 40. Tre will eventually be judged by what he does to strengthen this defence during the season. He’s done a good job on the offence acquiring Bert, Domi, and Klingberg. The offence is fine complemented by that emerging stud Knies.
Agree. Nylander just controls the game when he is on the ice. He is worth the money.
 

LEAFANFORLIFE23

Registered User
Jun 17, 2010
47,537
16,117
BT job is to win the Cup.
Love him or hate him, Dubas is the most successful GM for the Leafs in the past 20 yrs or so due to the Leafs advancing to the 2nd round.
If BT can win the Cup or advance the Leafs to ECF, he will be more successful than Dubas.

I don't think you realize how low that bar.
 

Gabriel426

Registered User
Jun 30, 2015
18,146
11,824
The only thing i said its you cant only winning when your top 3 in attack scoring, you need to find a way to win game even if youe top player struggling on scoresheet... you need people to step up...

Yep you can watch florida series Mm AM WN was unable to score gm 1-2-3 ( not necessairly because they dont had good scoring chance but just didn't goes in ... result they was down 3-0... they had to find a way to be at least 1-2. Get a samsonov to step up at least 1 game, get anybody to step up during 1 game and be a difference maker.
But if the rest of the team scored 90% of the goals and your top three highest paid players scored 10% in the same series. Chances are the team won’t win the series.
You are still not admitting that AM, MM and JT choked against the Panthers while the rest of the team did more than expected- scoring 90% of all goals.
If only someone stepped up, why does it need to be the rest of the team and not the three guys who getting paid the most?
Your narrative that the top guys are fine and the rest of the team needed to step up is false as the Leafs or any teams will always have a higher chance of success if their top 3 highest paid players score more than 10% of team scoring in any playoffs series.
It is unacceptable that they combined for 1 goal in the series and I could care less if they created many chances.

I don't think you realize how low that bar.
Trust me, I know it is a low bar but it is also fact.

Our team really didn’t had much success over the past 15yrs
 

MavisGoldberg

Registered User
Oct 8, 2023
93
123
I love how he has not set-up "Roadblocks" for our young talent. In past years, way too many vets/PTOs were signed and gifted spots.
 

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
42,166
12,602
Lets compare Leafs GM moves.

Kyle Dubas last year as Leafs GM summer work 2022-23.
=================================
Traded for disaster G - Matt Murray (2 years @ $4.67 mil)

G - Ilya Samsonov (one year, $1.8 Million AAV)
D - Jordie Benn (one year, $750,000 AAV)
D - Victor Mete (one year, $750,000 AAV)
F - Nicolas Aube-Kubel (one year, $1 Million AAV)
F - Adam Gaudette (one year, $750,000 AAV)
F - Denis Malgin (one year, $750,000 AAV)
F - Calle Jarnkrok (four years, $2.1 Million AAV)
& PTO signing F- Zach Aston-Reese (one year, $840,000 AAV)

VS.

Brad Treliving 1st year summer work 2023-24.
=============================
*G - Ilya Samsonov (one year, $3.55MM cap hit) [Arbitration reward]
G - Martin Jones (one year, $875K)
D - John Klingberg (one year, $4.2MM)
D - William Lagesson (one year, $775K)*
D - Simon Benoit (one year, $775K)
F - Ryan Reaves (three years, $4MM)
F - Max Domi (one year, $3MM)
F - Tyler Bertuzzi (one year, $5.5MM)
F - Dylan Gambrell (one year, $775K)
& potential PTO signing F - Noah Gregor

Which set of summer transactions do you like best the former GM or the current GM to move the Leafs toward Cup competitiveness?

BT has us with a team that may actually do well in the PO. Those Dubas moves in contrast are a joke.
 

Gallagbi

Formerly Eazy_B97
Jul 5, 2005
49,517
12,097
Mercifully, the days of Denis Malgin are behind us, and Leaf Nation fans are going to have to get use to embracing players with size and backbone that play a gritter game.
...we traded Malgin last year. For a gritty tweener who hit and fought.
 

notbias

Registered User
Feb 16, 2017
11,904
9,936
Mercifully, the days of Denis Malgin are behind us, and Leaf Nation fans are going to have to get use to embracing players with size and backbone that play a gritter game.

Weren't you saying that Treliving was doing a good job by bringing in Benoit? He was going to make the D big and tough or something...

Good times, love how we have embraced size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gallagbi

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
42,131
34,747
St. Paul, MN
Who managed Toronto Cap for the last 4 years?

Though part of that had to do with the timing of contracts. Last offseason more guys were still l locked up so there was less need to fill as many positions as this offseason. The major need last free agency was the second half of the goalie tandem, one top 9 forward and the rest just the standard replacement depth guys.
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,829
13,530
Leafs Home Board
Weren't you saying that Treliving was doing a good job by bringing in Benoit? He was going to make the D big and tough or something...

Good times, love how we have embraced size.
Too many foolish penalties by Benoit resulted in him being on waivers. Physicality and size are great but you have to have a hockey IQ and can't hurt the team taking needless penalties.

Leafs unfortunately can't carry any spare players due to cap management issues or he would likely be with the Leafs and still might be.

He was always looking to fill the #7/8 spots and never considered a top 6 addition.

Klingberg is the big add on D for the Leafs to help out one of the lowest scoring Dcores from last year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainCrunch17

acrobaticgoalie

Registered User
Jun 18, 2014
3,467
3,561
Mercifully, the days of Denis Malgin are behind us, and Leaf Nation fans are going to have to get use to embracing players with size and backbone that play a gritter game.
We already had fighters in the lineup that were useless in Clifford and Simmonds. Why is Reaves to be any different?
 

MavisGoldberg

Registered User
Oct 8, 2023
93
123
Mercifully, the days of Denis Malgin are behind us, and Leaf Nation fans are going to have to get use to embracing players with size and backbone that play a gritter game.
I'm sure sure Dubas kept acquiring those types of players...(Muzzin, Clifford (2), Simmonds, Lybuskhin, Laffery, Accriari, Marchment)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gallagbi

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
33,980
53,898
It looks like Minten makes the team. I think Tre was the one that wanted Nylander to try center. I also think Minten doesn’t make the team if Tre wasn’t the new GM. He made it happen with this trade, and I think it represents a shift in philosophy, the kid impressed, we have a need at center, let’s give it a shot. We will never know, but I don’t see this happening under Dubas, the GM has his fingerprints all over this surprising Minten emergence.
 

TMLAM34

Registered User
Oct 15, 2020
5,336
6,357
It looks like Minten makes the team. I think Tre was the one that wanted Nylander to try center. I also think Minten doesn’t make the team if Tre wasn’t the new GM. He made it happen with this trade, and I think it represents a shift in philosophy, the kid impressed, we have a need at center, let’s give it a shot. We will never know, but I don’t see this happening under Dubas, the GM has his fingerprints all over this surprising Minten emergence.
Not sure I get what you’re saying here. Treliving has done a good job and I think his idea to actually give Nylander a try at center was great and something that would probably never happen under Dubas.

When it comes to Minten though, no one’s fingerprints are on his situation other than his own. The kid came into camp determined and has impressed and surprised everyone including BT. Minten deserves all the credit for this.
 

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
33,980
53,898
Not sure I get what you’re saying here. Treliving has done a good job and I think his idea to actually give Nylander a try at center was great and something that would probably never happen under Dubas.

When it comes to Minten though, no one’s fingerprints are on his situation other than his own. The kid came into camp determined and has impressed and surprised everyone including BT. Minten deserves all the credit for this.
Sure. The kid has impressed, but he easily could have been sent down, this idea he was in contention to make the team was a complete shock, nobody was even considering it an option. I believe he was given every opportunity because the Leaf brain trust entertained it, and I see Tre as the primary “hey what about this?” given the previous Nylander angle. We will never know, but this move feels different, and he’s the only thing different. I’m not taking away from Minten, he’s made the case.
 

Auston Marlander

I was in the pool!!
Nov 3, 2011
13,873
8,456
Toronto
We already had fighters in the lineup that were useless in Clifford and Simmonds. Why is Reaves to be any different?
Reeves is a worse player than the Ghost of Wayne Simmonds. I get he is tough. But he is a bad hockey player. Toughness without some skill isn't a player that will help us. He'll be entertaining 5 to 10 times per year, and drive us nuts fthe other 75ish games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: acrobaticgoalie

TMLAM34

Registered User
Oct 15, 2020
5,336
6,357
Sure. The kid has impressed, but he easily could have been sent down, this idea he was in contention to make the team was a complete shock, nobody was even considering it an option. I believe he was given every opportunity because the Leaf brain trust entertained it, and I see Tre as the primary “hey what about this?” given the previous Nylander angle. We will never know, but this move feels different, and he’s the only thing different. I’m not taking away from Minten, he’s made the case.
I get what you’re saying. It definitely does seem like BT is providing some much needed common sense to this organization like giving Nylander a shot at center given he’s played center for most of his life and even trading Lafferty for any pick instead of loosing him for nothing but when it comes to Minten I think his play has been that good where any GM would want to see more at this level.
 

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
33,980
53,898
I get what you’re saying. It definitely does seem like BT is providing some much needed common sense to this organization like giving Nylander a shot at center given he’s played center for most of his life and even trading Lafferty for any pick instead of loosing him for nothing but when it comes to Minten I think his play has been that good where any GM would want to see more at this level.
I don’t think Dubas trades Lafferty to make room for Minten. Like last year when Robertson clearly won a job, was as impressive in camp, we stick with the vet because it was easier. We gave up an asset for really nothing here to make room for the kid, that’s Tre’s philosophy, Dubas already proved in the past he rolls different. Like I said, we will never know, but I give the GM credit here for what is a somewhat bold move, at the very least showing real pragmatism as he emerged a legit alternative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrizzGreen

TMLAM34

Registered User
Oct 15, 2020
5,336
6,357
Reeves is a worse player than the Ghost of Wayne Simmonds. I get he is tough. But he is a bad hockey player. Toughness without some skill isn't a player that will help us. He'll be entertaining 5 to 10 times per year, and drive us nuts fthe other 75ish games.
Did you watch Simmonds play in the 18 games last season? He was awful, I’ve never seen a player who was actually able to contribute offensively at one point in their career fall off so bad. Every puck that touched his stick resulted in a turnover basically. He threw some hits but nothing crazy. The only positive thing that came from his game was his fighting which Reaves is a WAY bigger threat.
 

notbias

Registered User
Feb 16, 2017
11,904
9,936
It looks like Minten makes the team. I think Tre was the one that wanted Nylander to try center. I also think Minten doesn’t make the team if Tre wasn’t the new GM. He made it happen with this trade, and I think it represents a shift in philosophy, the kid impressed, we have a need at center, let’s give it a shot. We will never know, but I don’t see this happening under Dubas, the GM has his fingerprints all over this surprising Minten emergence.

So Treliving is forcing Nylander to C and then to the wing because he is forcing a C into the lineup?

Makes perfect sense.

More likely, Minten has played well enough for a look (assuming he is getting one), and they didn't have a set 3C so they were trying Nylander... it isn't that deep.

Did you watch Simmonds play in the 18 games last season? He was awful, I’ve never seen a player who was actually able to contribute offensively at one point in their career fall off so bad. Every puck that touched his stick resulted in a turnover basically. He threw some hits but nothing crazy. The only positive thing that came from his game was his fighting which Reaves is a WAY bigger threat.

He's better than Reaves...
 

Auston Marlander

I was in the pool!!
Nov 3, 2011
13,873
8,456
Toronto
Did you watch Simmonds play in the 18 games last season? He was awful, I’ve never seen a player who was actually able to contribute offensively at one point in their career fall off so bad. Every puck that touched his stick resulted in a turnover basically. He threw some hits but nothing crazy. The only positive thing that came from his game was his fighting which Reaves is a WAY bigger threat.
You're right, Simmonds was horrible, yet he was still better at hockey than Reaves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gallagbi

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad