If you’re referring to AM, I would have moved him before signing that contract.So what would you have done let the franchise center go?
If you’re referring to AM, I would have moved him before signing that contract.So what would you have done let the franchise center go?
You had 5 years of patience with Kyle. Can't you give Brad a bit more than 6 months?I mean no shit, the core isn’t 22 anymore, we don’t have much time to for Brad to figure it out before it’s time for another rebuild. Also Dubas wasn’t coming in off one of some of the worst offseasons in a long time like Trev was with Calgary, he already used up his benefit of the doubt.
I think a major reason why there is no soft cap and luxury tax is bc more than half the teams in the league are in the red or just barely breaking even.I could see that being gamed so hard. Having a nightmare of super teams and load management. Why they don’t just do a soft cap and luxury tax is beyond me.
I think a major reason why there is no soft cap and luxury tax is bc more than half the teams in the league are in the red or just barely breaking even.
You had 5 years of patience with Kyle. Can't you give Brad a bit more than 6 months?
The biggest issue is the people that defended the kadri trade, Murray trade, mrazek signing etc are now the same people that are criticizing Triliving for essentially the same things previous GM’s have done. It doesn’t make sense. The whole board is so divided it makes talking leafs so painful.One guy was brought in to build a program for a perennial contender, was clear by the Covid seasons that wasn’t going to happen and I lost patience once we got away from the speed and skill down the lineup promise to chase after Folignos to make the talking heads happy about our physicality and leadership.
Trev was brought in to be Burke in Anaheim, the perennial contender dream is dead but maybe he can make some decisive shakeup moves to squeeze at least a few good runs out of this group. The expectations and timeline are different and so far he’s batting close to 0.
I get he was brought in on the condition that he’s not allowed to rock the boat at all and that comes from upstairs but it doesn’t mean the guy gets a free pass to avoid criticism.
Agreed. It's a fanbase divided and will take a while before most come back together. The ones that wanted to run it back year after year under Dubas, have wanted Treliving to complete two dozen transactions and resignings in the 6 months he's been in charge.The biggest issue is the people that defended the kadri trade, Murray trade, mrazek signing etc are now the same people that are criticizing Triliving for essentially the same things previous GM’s have done. It doesn’t make sense. The whole board is so divided it makes talking leafs so painful.
so you had no problem grossly overpaying Tavares and making him the highest paid player at that time but have an issue with AM's contract ?If you’re referring to AM, I would have moved him before signing that contract.
Your comment about the coach is valid, and I should have considered it. While I'm not a huge fan of Keefe, I take the position that the results we've seen are more about the players than the coach.The coach is the real question. I could have gone into the season with the only change being Keefe out and I would feel better about them than at this moment. Getting outshot by scrub teams and getting goalie wins isn't an achievement for the coach. Inability to put teams away in regulation is a real concern. Other teams are picking up on his strategies and anticipating what the Leafs are going to be doing pretty well every night. Teams are doing a lot better than this with weaker lineups. It shouldn't take an extended losing streak for this to be apparent, its the Xs and Os that are costing games, more than the individuals.
As to the Matthews deal I like it. From the standpoint of the club having no leverage its a win to me. The number is affordable and in two years the AAV will not be eye opening. He has the MVP on his resume and he is young enough that you are going to be paying for that achievement every year.
From my earlier post, "He (Dubas) did screw up with Willy, I'd have liked to see a more experienced approach. Willy would have set the tone for the next two. Here's your deal, it's fair, accept it or sit. Matthews at 10, Marner at 9 and Willy at 6.25 and we've another 4.25M for free agents every year of those RFA contracts, regardless of Covid."so you had no problem grossly overpaying Tavares and making him the highest paid player at that time but have an issue with AM's contract ?
you could also say if it wasn't for covid the 3 rfa's cap % would be lower as wellFrom my earlier post, "He (Dubas) did screw up with Willy, I'd have liked to see a more experienced approach. Willy would have set the tone for the next two. Here's your deal, it's fair, accept it or sit. Matthews at 10, Marner at 9 and Willy at 6.25 and we've another 4.25M for free agents every year of those RFA contracts, regardless of Covid."
In short, Matthews was overpaid/under-termed with his RFA deal which has bled into the one just signed.
Tavares, again I'll quote myself, "I had no problem with signing JT at 11. A free agent is going to get paid. It wasn't his (Dubas) fault the Wuhan Flu made John's cap hit a constant % of the Leaf's cap space.
Yes, and as I said the others were overpaid, Dubas's fault. I think where we disagree is simply the Tavares contract. You believing it was, a) an overpay for the player you see (not trying to put words in your mouth, just my take) where I see the contract as acceptable at the time which was then affected by the stagnant cap, and b) that JT's contract influenced the demands of the of 3 RFA deals that followed, to the team's detriment. I agree with 'b', Dubas overpaid them all and it has hurt since. You don't overpay on a RFA deal because you (management) hold the hammer. Sign or sit. Offer a fair deal, maybe put a sweetener in it, but don't go batshyte crazy.you could also say if it wasn't for covid the 3 rfa's cap % would be lower as well
Dubas set himself up for failure with the 3 rfa's by expecting he could overpay JT , try to sell it as a discount and then going on a ''me vs we'' media tour to try to get the 3 kids to take discounts .
The biggest issue i have with the JT signing other than he was never anywhere near as good as the hype around him was if your going to overpay for a ufa the it better be to fill a need and a 11m 2nd line C was even at the bottom of our list of needs
treliving did get get burned in calgary .his drafting was suspect ,but if he is as smart as they say he is he"ll learn from past mistakes .the tkachuk trade wasnt terrible the contract awarded after was a problemYou had 5 years of patience with Kyle. Can't you give Brad a bit more than 6 months?
The way Lagesson and Benoit have played and with Timmins here there is no need for a #7 man, our weakness is a #2-3 have plenty of 4-7Ontario native Bortuzzo would have been a nice add for a 7th.
Trades are hard though.
your exactly right , we're tits deep in 4-7 D , hell outside of Rielly that's all we have and more like Mo and and a bunch of 5-7 D . Tre needs to wait until he can find a 2-3 , hopefully one becomes available .The way Lagesson and Benoit have played and with Timmins here there is no need for a #7 man, our weakness is a #2-3 have plenty of 4-7
AgreedThen you're taking their point a little bit too literally. It's really not hard to figure out that they don't care if the team finishes 8th or 1st, as long as they have more playoff success.
Tre has already bitched about not having any assets. Surprisingly he has more excuses than dubas.The way Lagesson and Benoit have played and with Timmins here there is no need for a #7 man, our weakness is a #2-3 have plenty of 4-7
You keep telling yourself thatTre has already bitched about not having any assets. Surprisingly he has more excuses than dubas.
Yeah who doesn’t want a 34 year old healthy scratch dmanOntario native Bortuzzo would have been a nice add for a 7th.
Trades are hard though.