notbias
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2017
- 12,191
- 10,112
Trading assets for a better chance to win is a very vague statement. Yes, trading assets for rentals (which is what we're talking about) is reasonable if the rentals might put a contender over the top. We weren't really a contender at all, so those trades were nothing more than a desperate attempt to fix a mess.
Sure, trade picks for prospects, or prospects for picks. But don't trade either for a quick fix that won't work.
How much has the cap gone up and will go up during JT's contract? Add that to the 4 and see what you get.
I am curious how much we've traded for pure rentals... players that were there for only a playoff run and no longer.
ROR and Foligno are the only ones I can think of that had a high price tag, but feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
You say we weren't a contender, virtually everyone else says the opposite.
Was Washington a contender before they won? Was Florida considered a contender last year? A team that is constantly at the top of the standings is a contender to me. Any team getting into the playoffs can contend though.
Are you banking on a cap raise... it sounds very Dubas-like to me.