NYRCSKA*
Guest
Is that at MSG or ACC? I know what Canadians can drink.....if you guys drink as much...no deal.![]()
MSG.. why the hell would the Rangers ask for the Leafs to give their own fans free beer? Give us the free beer.
Is that at MSG or ACC? I know what Canadians can drink.....if you guys drink as much...no deal.![]()
Has he been getting booed when he's touched the puck yet? If I was at the game I'd be booing the hell out of Beaver every time he touched a puck.
This is what I posted in the Brad Richards turning into a Gomez/Redden thread, and it's how I strongly feel regarding Richards and his current situation.
His first season he had 66 points and lead the Rangers in scoring in the post season, and outside of Lundqvist, was the biggest reason the Rangers made it to the Conference Finals.
This year, he had a slow start, but still finished at a 60 point pace for the regular season.
Tortorella gave him two or three games to prove something, he didn't produce, and was relegated to the forth line. Ironically, Nash has contributed just as poorly but still comes in at 20 minutes a game.
Richards played his best hockey of the season down the stretch. Richards finished the month of April at 14GP 6G 10A 16PTS +9. His best hockey of the season (of which he was a significant factor of the Rangers going 10-3-1 to clinch a playoff spot). After that, Tortorella gave him two or three games, and he was sent to the forth line with Asham (who admittedly did solid for the Rangers) getting 10 minutes a game.
If fans or the coaching staff expected more than what Richards has done, being placed on the forth line, averaging 10 minutes a game (most of which comes on a PP unit that is completely broken) I'd say your expectations are out of line.
If Richards was on the 1st or 2nd line getting 20 minutes a night and only had 1 goal, I'd be concerned. Given the circumstances and how poorly his situation was handled, it was about what I expected. As a coach, knowing he played his best hockey down the stretch, and knowing how important him getting going is for the team, I'd have given him more time (especially since Callahan, Nash and Stepan have done so little with their top-6 minutes).
He has 100 points in 128 regular season games with the Rangers and had one real solid playoff run with the team. He isn't close to what Gomez/Redden turned out to be for the Rangers.
Again, this is a situation where I felt the coach handled it poorly, and it lead to results I expected.
I remember when Gaborik was the reason for Richards decline.
I thought he was. Richards got quite a bit better for a little while after the trade. Then fell back to earth.
You'd boo a player who's play has declined? Really? Leave that **** to Montreal fans.
Honestly, our fan base is better than that garbage. Booing your own players is a joke and a disgrace.
I'm all for buying him out ASAP. But booing him?![]()
You'd boo a player who's play has declined? Really? Leave that **** to Montreal fans.
Honestly, our fan base is better than that garbage. Booing your own players is a joke and a disgrace.
I'm all for buying him out ASAP. But booing him?![]()
After tonight's game--and the complete inability of Richards to do anything positive on the power play--I wouldn't be against scratching Richards for the rest of the season. It's painful to watch him out there.
You'd boo a player who's play has declined? Really? Leave that **** to Montreal fans.
Honestly, our fan base is better than that garbage. Booing your own players is a joke and a disgrace.
I'm all for buying him out ASAP. But booing him?![]()
This is what I posted in the Brad Richards turning into a Gomez/Redden thread, and it's how I strongly feel regarding Richards and his current situation.
His first season he had 66 points and lead the Rangers in scoring in the post season, and outside of Lundqvist, was the biggest reason the Rangers made it to the Conference Finals.
This year, he had a slow start, but still finished at a 60 point pace for the regular season.
Tortorella gave him two or three games to prove something, he didn't produce, and was relegated to the forth line. Ironically, Nash has contributed just as poorly but still comes in at 20 minutes a game.
Richards played his best hockey of the season down the stretch. Richards finished the month of April at 14GP 6G 10A 16PTS +9. His best hockey of the season (of which he was a significant factor of the Rangers going 10-3-1 to clinch a playoff spot). After that, Tortorella gave him two or three games, and he was sent to the forth line with Asham (who admittedly did solid for the Rangers) getting 10 minutes a game.
If fans or the coaching staff expected more than what Richards has done, being placed on the forth line, averaging 10 minutes a game (most of which comes on a PP unit that is completely broken) I'd say your expectations are out of line.
If Richards was on the 1st or 2nd line getting 20 minutes a night and only had 1 goal, I'd be concerned. Given the circumstances and how poorly his situation was handled, it was about what I expected. As a coach, knowing he played his best hockey down the stretch, and knowing how important him getting going is for the team, I'd have given him more time (especially since Callahan, Nash and Stepan have done so little with their top-6 minutes).
He has 100 points in 128 regular season games with the Rangers and had one real solid playoff run with the team. He isn't close to what Gomez/Redden turned out to be for the Rangers.
Again, this is a situation where I felt the coach handled it poorly, and it lead to results I expected.
I agree we should all give him a standing O tomorrow night & pat him on the back & tell him it's going to be all right while stroking his head.
I don't reward people for failure.
Richards should be booed until he cries. He deserves it.
This is what I posted in the Brad Richards turning into a Gomez/Redden thread, and it's how I strongly feel regarding Richards and his current situation.
His first season he had 66 points and lead the Rangers in scoring in the post season, and outside of Lundqvist, was the biggest reason the Rangers made it to the Conference Finals.
This year, he had a slow start, but still finished at a 60 point pace for the regular season.
Tortorella gave him two or three games to prove something, he didn't produce, and was relegated to the forth line. Ironically, Nash has contributed just as poorly but still comes in at 20 minutes a game.
Richards played his best hockey of the season down the stretch. Richards finished the month of April at 14GP 6G 10A 16PTS +9. His best hockey of the season (of which he was a significant factor of the Rangers going 10-3-1 to clinch a playoff spot). After that, Tortorella gave him two or three games, and he was sent to the forth line with Asham (who admittedly did solid for the Rangers) getting 10 minutes a game.
If fans or the coaching staff expected more than what Richards has done, being placed on the forth line, averaging 10 minutes a game (most of which comes on a PP unit that is completely broken) I'd say your expectations are out of line.
If Richards was on the 1st or 2nd line getting 20 minutes a night and only had 1 goal, I'd be concerned. Given the circumstances and how poorly his situation was handled, it was about what I expected. As a coach, knowing he played his best hockey down the stretch, and knowing how important him getting going is for the team, I'd have given him more time (especially since Callahan, Nash and Stepan have done so little with their top-6 minutes).
He has 100 points in 128 regular season games with the Rangers and had one real solid playoff run with the team. He isn't close to what Gomez/Redden turned out to be for the Rangers.
Again, this is a situation where I felt the coach handled it poorly, and it lead to results I expected.
Ridiculous. I'm sorry, but you don't boo your own players. Period. There may be a few rare exceptions to the rule, but Richards does not fall into any of them. The dude has just lost his legs. Is that his fault? Did he force Sather to sign him to a big contract? Has he complained about a reduced role? Perhaps if you can answer yes to any of those than you may have a case. You can't and therefor do not have a case.
The dude has just lost his legs. Is that his fault? .
Cmon man. You act like the dude is 45 years old. He just turned 33! I am 32, and keeping in shape, skating a few times a week, I could skate circles around him.
That's a poor excuse for a guy who would rather discuss the fruity overtones of a ****ing pinot noir opposed to busting his ass with a personal trainer on a leg press.
Ridiculous. I'm sorry, but you don't boo your own players. Period. There may be a few rare exceptions to the rule, but Richards does not fall into any of them. The dude has just lost his legs. Is that his fault? Did he force Sather to sign him to a big contract? Has he complained about a reduced role? Perhaps if you can answer yes to any of those than you may have a case. You can't and therefor do not have a case.
These type of "arguments" is where the Richards critique needs to stop. Unless you are sharing this mythical bottle of Pinot Noir w/ Richards and can prove it, it's all BS hearsay that fans project on players that are playing poorly.
Brad Richards has played incredibly poorly this post-season, but the notion that a fan can skate circles around him is BS. Players in the NHL are, but fans cannot. Am I splitting hairs, no, because this has absolutely snowballed into ridiculousness.
But I'll put my money where my mouth is. I'll pull some tape from Richards this season. I'll find a clip or two of him skating full out (albeit will need quite a bit of tape for that) and I'll time his full speed from red line to red line. I'll be happy to meet you at a NYC rink and time you. Beat it, lunch and pinot are on me.
Let's keep the hyperbole to a minimum. There is plenty to criticize of Brad Richards, but let's not make stuff up.
Let's keep the hyperbole to a minimum. There is plenty to criticize of Brad Richards, but let's not make stuff up.
Make stuff up?
Forbes: So what have you been doing to stay busy?
Richards: I’ve had a lot of free time, but it’s been tough just to take off and do things because it seems like every two-to-three weeks, you get your hopes up and you start training and skating. Knowing what I do now, it would have been smart to take October off and re-energize. But we’ve been kind of in-between all the time. I’ve stayed in New York for the most part. We’ve had between 8 and 12 guys here most of the time. The captains run practice to try to stay in shape and stay sharp. There has been some boredom, but I went home to Canada for the holidays, so that was good. January will be really tough if we don’t get going.
Richards: I like wearing the stuff. Chris [Riccobono, the founder of Untuckit] is an athlete. He played tennis in college. We share a love of wine.
Forbes: Any good wines you’ve found lately?
Richards: I love everything from the Bordeaux region. Others? Let me see. [Pauses] You put me on the spot. You can tell I drink a lot of wine since I can’t even narrow it down. You know, Chris is really into Italian wines, so we’ve been trying out Brunellos and learning about that region.
Ever check out his instagram during the lock out? Maybe you should...
For the full article, you can read it here.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/montebu...his-frustration-with-the-ongoing-nhl-lockout/
In the meantime, ill continue making stuff up.![]()
He was probably referring to your musing that you could skate circles around an NHL player, which is beyond making stuff up.