Fossy21
Nobel Prize Deke
- Mar 14, 2013
- 20,262
- 2,343
He's not scoring 37 goals again this year, why pay him big boy money and lock him down for 8 years now?
He's not scoring 37 goals again this year, why pay him big boy money and lock him down for 8 years now?
He left money on the table on ever deal he made with the Bruins. Loyalty is rare in sports and he wanted to stay. Combining salaries of Marchand and Bergeron equals 13 million a year, let that sink in.
8 years is CRAZY. What if he declines majorly in 3 years? With his style of play that is very possible. That could look like a brutal contract in 4 years.
Probably will happen, but still a reasonable cap hit...8 years is CRAZY. What if he declines majorly in 3 years? With his style of play that is very possible. That could look like a brutal contract in 4 years.
I see Boston's management seems hell bent on absolutely destroying their teams cap situation in a few seasons.
GM's (and fans even more so) fall in love with vets way too easily. A team that could t even make the playoffs last year has no business locking up vets until their late 30s.
The odds of Sweeney being GM the last few years of that deal is very low, so why not give the player eight years? If it's a headache, it'll be for someone else.
I think it's a good deal for the all around play he brings. Look at the ufa deals signed this summer via backes, okposo, erikkson.
Besides, his shot % didn't go up, his shot production did. When goal scorers shoot more, they score more. If he keeps shooting, that wont regress.
I remember when Bruins fans insulted me because I said that Marchand will probably be getting the same contract as guys like Eriksson and Okposo. Those were good times.
I see Boston's management seems hell bent on absolutely destroying their teams cap situation in a few seasons.
GM's (and fans even more so) fall in love with vets way too easily. A team that could t even make the playoffs last year has no business locking up vets until their late 30s.
That's actually far from accurate. His style of play is quite conducive to long term continuation. I think you're completely wrong here.
eight years is mile differnt than 6 years. honestly i would have prefered a 7.5 mill over 6 year deal. to me, the 8 years for an undersized guy that relies on quickness is very scary
but i love the guy so im happy today
This seems like about the right number for Marchand if he wanted a mega deal. People seem to underestimate how much effective forwards cost these days. You aren't getting a Marchand level player on the market for under $6M, no way no how.
Kadri deal keeps getting better and better
8 years is CRAZY. What if he declines majorly in 3 years? With his style of play that is very possible. That could look like a brutal contract in 4 years.