Obviously we are better if we replace Scandella with a better D man. But how do you pay that D-man? Even if the 3rd pairing is making $1.5M or less, we can't replace a $3M D with a $5M+ guy. We could maybe get Lindholm with retention, but how do we afford him next year with his raise? Are we trading assets for a pure rental?
If we acquire and Re-sign a Scandella replacement, where does Perunovich go when if he takes a step up? He's an RFA next year. If he plays well he will earn a higher AAV. If he plays well enough to earn top 4 minutes, who goes? Faulk, Krug, and Parayko all have NTCs for at least 3 more years after this one. Lindholm, or whoever we upgrade over Scandella, probably will as well signing a new contract. So do we jettison a potential stud on a cost controlled deal in Perunovich because there is no room for him?
Scandella is fine as a $3M D. Krug is the one causing problems as he cannot defend a plastic bag someone tossed on the ice. The bag is both to strong and too quick for him. Krug has to be the one to go. We have to find a way to get him to waive. Perunovich can take his place as the PP QB, sheltered offensive D.
Lindholm - Parayko
Scandella - Faulk
Perunovich - Bortuzzo
Scandella and Faulk can help the defensive load a bit, giving the top pair some more offensive zone starts. But in true offensive situations, we can double shift Perunovich with Faulk. Its the only way it works