Snubbed4Vezina
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2022
- 2,349
- 4,144
And here we go...He also said explicitly for the first time that I've heard, that late in the Petro negotiation he offered him NMC.
And here we go...He also said explicitly for the first time that I've heard, that late in the Petro negotiation he offered him NMC.
It’s interesting that Bannister is so different from coaches Army is used to in demeanor.This was great interview. Beyond the insight on this year's team, he really shed a lot of light on many GMing topics:
- he had Bannister play kids last year after TDL, was first time he had told a coach who to play
- His inner circle at this point is Steen and Miller and Taylor. Said top advisor had been Dave Taylor initially here, then Chiarelli and also Mellanby has big voice.
- Said he reads message boards!
- He also said explicitly for the first time that I've heard, that late in the Petro negotiation he offered him NMC.
- EDIT: He also said the biggest regret he had/mistake he made was not getting Petro deal done.
I didn’t listen to this, so not sure if he’s specifying a full NMC, but he’s previously said he had offered a partial NMC for some of the years. Also, I don’t care to relitigate this again, but it’s nice to hear him talk more openly about these details. I think nearing retirement he’s letting his hair down a little.This was great interview. Beyond the insight on this year's team, he really shed a lot of light on many GMing topics:
- he had Bannister play kids last year after TDL, was first time he had told a coach who to play
- His inner circle at this point is Steen and Miller and Taylor. Said top advisor had been Dave Taylor initially here, then Chiarelli and also Mellanby has big voice.
- Said he reads message boards!
- He also said explicitly for the first time that I've heard, that late in the Petro negotiation he offered him NMC.
- EDIT: He also said the biggest regret he had/mistake he made was not getting Petro deal done.
This felt like him saying that he got to full nmc by end of negotiations, which he hadn't said before to my knowledge. He'd talked about offering partial. Here it read like, I don't like them, not comfortable with them, but begrudgingly agreed to do it bc wanted to keep key guy. He didn't go into too much depth on the negotiations, said something like once he and Petro are retired he would perhaps say more.I didn’t listen to this, so not sure if he’s specifying a full NMC, but he’s previously said he had offered a partial NMC for some of the years. Also, I don’t care to relitigate this again, but it’s nice to hear him talk more openly about these details. I think nearing retirement he’s letting his hair down a little.
What hair?I didn’t listen to this, so not sure if he’s specifying a full NMC, but he’s previously said he had offered a partial NMC for some of the years. Also, I don’t care to relitigate this again, but it’s nice to hear him talk more openly about these details. I think nearing retirement he’s letting his hair down a little.
I didn’t take away from his comment that it was a full NMC or partial, just that something of the NMC variety was offered. He didn’t elaborate so all we can do is speculate. Based on what was previously stated, I would guess it was what we already knew. But he could have meant otherwise.This felt like him saying that he got to full nmc by end of negotiations, which he hadn't said before to my knowledge. He'd talked about offering partial. Here it read like, I don't like them, not comfortable with them, but begrudgingly agreed to do it bc wanted to keep key guy. He didn't go into too much depth on the negotiations, said something like once he and Petro are retired he would perhaps say more.
Before the year started he was projected as a top10 pick. Now outside of the top 2-3 players of every draft their is usually a fair amount of fluidity in those picks. It is so hard for me to judge Jiricek because of the injury. The skill is undeniable but it's now on him to bounce back from the injury and prove it, this year of development is crucial for him.
We had talked about this at one point in the draft thread, I don't think he fell at all. I remember discussing around the time of his injury that worst case scenario draft-slot wise we would get Jiricek at 14, which would be solid but I was hoping for a bigger fish. Then about a week before the draft I was talking to perryturnbull fan about how weird it was that his draft projections hadn't dropped more. He draft stock stayed really stable IMO, which never happens. But pre-injury I believe most mocks had him outside of the top 8-10, which I agreed with. I saw one or two at 10, mostly between the 12-16 range and he ended up at 16.
It’s really hard to say as we don’t know how the rest of his season would’ve gone. He reportedly had a good Hlinka-Gretzky tourney but was then just so-so in the Czech Extraliga and their Jr league. Then he blew out his ACL the first game of the WJC. Would he have really picked it up the 2nd half of the season? Would he have not really progressed and people start questioning him and his stock drops? Who knows. He’s a pretty big unknown IMO.
Hopefully he has a good season this year. Not sure he’s even on the ice yet though. He didn’t play in any of the preseason games for the Czech U20 team.
Great interview with Jiricek's agent, Allan Walsh, on SDPN.
According to Allan, Adam should be cleared to play by training camp (September). When he was asked where he likely would have gone had the ACL injury not occurred, he stated top 8. It is important to note that 90% of athletes with ACL reconstruction regain full strength and laxity (depending on which literature you're looking at). Other notable athletes to have gotten ACL injuries include Morgan Reilly during his draft year and Malkin in 2011, who came back the following season posting 109 points in 75 games with a +18. Nowadays, Orthopedic surgeons routinely fix these types of injuries, and the rehabilitation protocol is well-established. Most people here are familiar with Robby Fabbri, but he was an outlier. The Blues may have picked up a gem, and I'll be following Jiricek's season in Brantford periodically.
Also, around 18:25, Allan mentions Adam Jecho's personality and skillset.
Great interview with Jiricek's agent, Allan Walsh, on SDPN.
According to Allan, Adam should be cleared to play by training camp (September). When he was asked where he likely would have gone had the ACL injury not occurred, he stated top 8. It is important to note that 90% of athletes with ACL reconstruction regain full strength and laxity (depending on which literature you're looking at). Other notable athletes to have gotten ACL injuries include Morgan Reilly during his draft year and Malkin in 2011, who came back the following season posting 109 points in 75 games with a +18. Nowadays, Orthopedic surgeons routinely fix these types of injuries, and the rehabilitation protocol is well-established. Most people here are familiar with Robby Fabbri, but he was an outlier. The Blues may have picked up a gem, and I'll be following Jiricek's season in Brantford periodically.
Also, around 18:25, Allan mentions Adam Jecho's personality and skillset.
I hope so!I think Jecho and Stancl are rated too low on our board rankings.
Great find, thank you!
Yeah see it's Jiricek's combo of skating ability, puck handling and physicality where I'm having difficulty coming up with a really good comp for him.
Those two are mysterious.I think Jecho and Stancl are rated too low on our board rankings.
Those two are mysterious.
He reminds me of Pietrangelo. Jiricek is a tall, right-handed defenseman with strong skating ability and poise at both ends of the the ice. Both players demonstrate good leadership qualities, aggressive defense, and can feather the puck accurately to teammates. Like Pietrangelo, Adam's main weakness is shot accuracy. Just to be clear, this is purely a stylistic comparison and not a projection of Jiricek's future accomplishments in the NHL. At this point, I think Jiricek's overall skillset is a bit more raw and will need more development so I think two years in the OHL followed by one year in the AHL could be his timeline.
I would much rather have a defenseman who pulls the puck off the oppositions stick with exceptional frequency and can exit the zone with elite proficiency than one trying to hit his way to glory. This coming from one of the bigger Scott Steven’s fans out there.I can't say I agree. Jiricek is far more physical than Petro, which is probably the biggest problem I had with him when he was here. He could play an entire game with a carton of eggs wrapped around him and not break one. Hopefully, he does have some of Petro's traits with his stick defensively and offensively. Petro was the most talented Blue I got to see since the 70s, but also the most enigmatic in using it.
I’d agree.I would much rather have a defenseman who pulls the puck off the oppositions stick with exceptional frequency and can exit the zone with elite proficiency than one trying to hit his way to glory. This coming from one of the bigger Scott Steven’s fans out there.
Why?I think Jecho and Stancl are rated too low on our board rankings.
He reminds me of Pietrangelo. Jiricek is a tall, right-handed defenseman with strong skating ability and poise at both ends of the the ice. Both players demonstrate good leadership qualities, aggressive defense, and can feather the puck accurately to teammates. Like Pietrangelo, Adam's main weakness is shot accuracy. Just to be clear, this is purely a stylistic comparison and not a projection of Jiricek's future accomplishments in the NHL. At this point, I think Jiricek's overall skillset is a bit more raw and will need more development so I think two years in the OHL followed by one year in the AHL could be his timeline.
I see some McAvoy in him.I don't really see the Petro comp. As I've said before, his great skating and mobility with the puck reminds me of Makar. I don't think his ceiling is as high as Makar but stylistically, I see Makar much more so than Petro.
This was the name that kept popping up in my head as well.I see some McAvoy in him.
For starters, I think we stole Jecho where we picked him. You can't teach size. The dude is a massive 6'-5" at 18. He could still grow an inch or two before he is done. 205 lbs. before he fleshes out in his 20's. The dude is going to be a monster and almost impossible to move off the puck. His rookie season with the Oil Kings he's almost a point per game guy. He's a good distributor of the puck and a pretty well-rounded player. The only knock on him really is his skating and willingness to be physical. I know skating is even more important in today's game but given time to mature (and have his skating catch up with his body) I think he turns into a really good middle six player at minimum. This year for Czechia (U20) he had 6 points in 4 games. This guy is a diamond in the rough.Why?
Jecho has plenty of issues with how he plays the game and is a player more lauded for his tools than play. Stancl is a defensive player with worse abilities than Kos.
I think both as rated quite fairly by our board.