Andy6
Court Jetster
What would prevent a team from playing the Americans over 49% of the time and then taking the fine to make or advance in the playoffs? They'd need to think through the incentives on this very carefully.I don't understand that first sentence. No matter what, those spots aren't lost. They would still be Canadian starters and would have to play in over 50% of the snaps in a game.
In practice this is how I see it working. You'd have to track that the next day. Make the penalties massive. Like 50K for a first violation, 100K + 5th round pick for 2nd violation, 250K + 1st Round pick for 3rd volation, 500K + 3 1sts for 4th violation, etc.
In that case, no team is going to risk approaching that threshold. Canadian starter will play 70-90% of every game, no coach is gonna want to track that. Probably save the snaps from the american backup in certain situations.
An example would be let's say Bombers D. Jake Thomas is designated a canadian starter. Late in the game in obvious passing situations Bombers want to go 3 DL and bring in an extra DB, there best backup is say Demario Houston (EDIT: The replacement must be "naturalized american" so a guy like Houston wouldn't qualify. Yes, I don't have all the details). With this rule they can bring in Houston for Thomas in those certain sitations. They are not going to approach 49% for risk of the big penalties so it'll be saved for key situations.
The other thing is that a team doesn't know how many snaps they will get in a game, which could confuse things under certain circumstances. For example, you play an American a lot on key drives in the 2d and 3d quarters, intending to sit him out in the 4th quarter, but then only get a handful of snaps in the 4th quarter - putting you over 49% usage. All of a sudden you're in violation, even though the previous week the identical number of "American" snaps was well below 49% of the total.
You could have teams playing a bunch of short plays late in a game in a desperate effort to increase their snap total in order to bring their American usage back down to 49%.
I wonder why they wouldn't take the simpler route of just naming a certain number of snaps that approximates 49% of the snaps a team would get on an average day. This issue will probably skew the usage of the American toward late-game situations (which might have been the case for other obvious reasons anyway).