Damn, we need bigger wood, if you need to be that precise.
Damn, we need bigger wood, if you need to be that precise.
Damnit..you're right.Yeah, that doesn’t seem right at all.
Aren’t Volton and Wood on IR? That’s 6.5M right there
I don't love it from an asset management perspective. The two moves together boil down to:
Georgieve
Annunen
Kovalenko
2nd
6th
For
Blackwood
Wedgewood
G. Smith
which at least one of those positions could have been filled by signing Lankinen in the offseason and waiving Annunen - if he gets picked up, at least you still have your 6th. Plus, Lankinen playing steady doesn't put the Georgiev deal in such an act of desperation, and you can probably still pull of the Blackwood deal without Kovalenko,
I know people are saying Kovalenko isn't a big loss, and maybe not for this season or next, but he's young, cheap depth with upside that can really come in handy when injuries hit. Having G. Smith or Wagner on the depth chart when healthy is not good.
That being said, it's an improvement both on the ice and in the room. I think the vibe change alone from Annunen -> Wedgewood and subtracting Georgiev is going to spark this team mentally. I think often analytics folks and fans alike really underestimate the power of group dynamics when building a successful team. I bet Mikko was holding out on his extension until Georgiev was moved
All in all, I think it's a net positive. I just think losing Kovy is going to hurt more in the long run than people might want to admit and if CMac was a little more proactive he could have saved some valuable assets.
The biggest thing for me is despite his inconsistency and injury history, Blackwood has the ability to steal games. Georgiev hasn't had that ability since his first season here. It was pure garbage or acceptable goaltending, he was never going to be the sole reason we won a game, and that's something any contender needs.
The last time we acquired a Shark and just straight-up signed him before he played a single game, that worked out great !I wonder if they have next contract already on table for Blackwood?
The price was high, so why not sign him now?
Man I hate that we lost Kovy but it is what it is. How the f*** did we have to retain on 4giev though? Wtf.
Man I hate that we lost Kovy but it is what it is. How the f*** did we have to retain on 4giev though? Wtf.
the biggest headache tooWe unloaded the worst goalie in the NHL, it was never going to be easy
Have you watched him play?Keeping Georgiev would have been less painful .
I think we need to free up at least $2.5m to activate Landeskog with a fully healthy lineup (which granted, we almost never see; so one of our IR regulars like Wood or JD might solve alone the problem IF Landeskog is ever activated). The below is a 22 man roster $2,496,000 over the cap (and does take into account the retained money on Georgiev):Damnit..you're right.
Still...I thought RosCo was off LTIR, and capwages still shows him there and are treating him as LTIR.
Have I mentioned that I miss capfriendly lately? Why can't any other website operate as efficiently as they did?
I’m sure it’s an upgrade . Kovalenko and a second seems steep . But in suppose it was the least awful option available . Other teams knew we had to make a tradeHave you watched him play?
Keeping Georgiev would have been less painful . Hope to be surprised but I expect just a slightly less awful version of Georgiev . Terrible return
Yeah, I'm thinking the best thing to do is to keep Landy out until the playoffs begin and use every single penny available between now and then on fixing up the team.I think we need to free up at least $2.5m to activate Landeskog with a fully healthy lineup (which granted, we almost never see; so one of our IR regulars like Wood or JD might solve alone the problem IF Landeskog is ever activated). The below is a 22 man roster $2,496,000 over the cap (and does take into account the retained money on Georgiev):
View attachment 942491
As a fellow Canadian, I agree.More Canadians is better
That's right, the goal is to win hahaAs a fellow Canadian, I agree.
no that would be AustraliaCanadian? Isn't that just America Lite?