HawkeyTalkMan
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2015
- 6,271
- 3,445
Its much easier to replace a 4C than a solid top-4 D. I'm still thinking about this year, not just signing Panarin. Moving Seabrook is something I'd really consider after this season, especially if Pokka/Forsling/Kempny show that they can play top-4 minutes for us.
I refuse to believe that Kruger's defensive prowess is so valuable when the possession numbers, shot suppression numbers, and quite frankly, the eye-test show me otherwise. You have to put up more than 17 points in a year, whether you're facing top competition or not.
Completely disagree with you
Krugers 3 year trend and analytics are EXCELLENT for his assignments
Here is a break down over the last 3 years trend available:
Krugers corsi for % - 52.9 (Kane for example is 53.2 over that same span)
Krugers zone starts over the last 3 year trend:
defensive zone - 49.8% (by far the most on the blackhawks, next closest is Desjardins at 33.3%)
neutral zone - 31.1%
offensive zone - 19.1% (by far the lowest on the team, next lowest is Desjardins at 27.6%)
For as much as people bag on Kruger for his offense, how is he expected to produce offense when over the last 3 years he only starts in the offensive zone 19% of the time and most of the time he starts 200 feet away from the other teams net? Along with ZERO power play time
kruger flourishes in his role but his production numbers are purely a result of Quennevilles preference of his deployment
There is a reason Kruger is on team Sweden for every major international competition for being "only" a fourth line player