BagHead
Registered User
So much this.Fletcher seems like a pretty sharp guy, but in his time in Minnesota and (especially) Philadelphia he hasn't really demonstrated that he knows what a winning hockey team looks like.
Fenton seems to have keen eye for the game and individual players, but zero interpersonal skills. It also didn't sound like he was too interested in dissenting opinions.
Guerin doesn't come off as very book smart but he seems to have ideas about what a "winning team" looks like, even if a lot of that has come across as intangible, cultural stuff. Regardless, you don't need to be the sharpest knife in the drawer if you can attract a bunch of sharper knives to work for you. Remains to be seen if that's the case with the current management group, but I guess time will tell.
I know you didn't ask for a lesson or anything, but think of it like this and you'll get it right 90% of the time:Im not the most intelligent person I still struggle with basic English (than and then for example is something that has never clicked) because of underlining issues that limit me but yes Im successful enough to have been able to retire last year on my 28th birthday because Ive made enough smart decisions in my life to do so So i myself am a perfect example of not being intelligent but being successful and being able to reap the benefits
Like I said in a previous post Kwesi will be a perfect example of all of this
"Then" is sequence based (time): If this happens, then that happens.
"Than" is quantity based (amounts): I have more intelligence than a monkey (most monkeys, anyway).
That's probably not perfect, but can be a rule of thumb. Anyway, just wanted to be helpful.