Again, put on the tape and compare.
It's not really a hypothetical. We're able to watch both players play hundreds of games. It shouldn't be difficult to determine who had better goal scoring ability.
Ovechkin is in his 20th season now. At this point you're referring to the first quarter of his career. And there were certainly guys better at cleaning up rebounds at the net.
He has a great shot from anywhere, I'm well aware. He's just no longer an offense driver and hasn't been for a long, long time unfortunately. He's had 40 assists once since 2011. He performs his role well but his role has been to get open for the chances his teammates create.Through 830 career goals, 127 of them were PP one timers - less than half his total PP goals to that point. That's 15% of 830. People on here act like it's 40-50% of his total.
Lemieux played in the highest scoring era. How did you just imagine 120 goals?Ovie is great but I think it’s embarrassing to anyone if trying to compare to Lemieux.
Let Lemieux play 3vs3 OT’s, no 2 line passes, and an era where every D isn’t holding every shift, and Lemieux scores 120 goals in a season.
Ovie is great but I think it’s embarrassing to anyone if trying to compare to Lemieux.
Let Lemieux play 3vs3 OT’s, no 2 line passes, and an era where every D isn’t holding every shift, and Lemieux scores 120 goals in a season.
I’m not so sure. I’ve never seen Mario as fast at all, but probably faster than I thought simply because of his size and lanky stride. That said, sometimes you need to take what other players say with a grain of salt. I tried to look up video of Mario blowing past Pronger and the video I found was Pronger taking about this and how he didn’t know how fast he was, etc. anyway Pronger says Lemieux had 4 goals and 4 assists that game and Pronger said he himself was -8. Problem is, Lemieux scored 8pts three times in his career, all before Pronger was in the league and from what I can tell, Pronger’s worst +/- was -5 and it wasn’t against Lemieux.Another thing Mario had and isn’t talked about is speed. Pronger has said on record in his blues days how caught off guard he was at lemieux’s speed. There is a goal on YouTube a Chris Pronger trying to defend a wide rush to the net by Mario with the puck, the puck ended up in the net…
Using this definition, I think I take Mario at his best. Can't go wrong with Ovi but Mario's shot arsenal is a bit more versatile IMO; better hands, more size, strength, hockey IQ, etc. Ovi's no slouch in any of those departments but Mario was a freak of nature.
I’m not so sure. I’ve never seen Mario as fast at all, but probably faster than I thought simply because of his size and lanky stride. That said, sometimes you need to take what other players say with a grain of salt. I tried to look up video of Mario blowing past Pronger and the video I found was Pronger taking about this and how he didn’t know how fast he was, etc. anyway Pronger says Lemieux had 4 goals and 4 assists that game and Pronger said he himself was -8. Problem is, Lemieux scored 8pts three times in his career, all before Pronger was in the league and from what I can tell, Pronger’s worst +/- was -5 and it wasn’t against Lemieux.
Ovie is great but I think it’s embarrassing to anyone if trying to compare to Lemieux.
Let Lemieux play 3vs3 OT’s, no 2 line passes, and an era where every D isn’t holding every shift, and Lemieux scores 120 goals in a season.
OV will score the most goals in a career. Mario was a better goal scorer. Both can be true.
Great players will be great in any era. Skate, stick, ice, equipment, training etc all impact each era. Hands and iq are the constant. Mario excelled at both.Let's not act like Lemieux didnt get to play in the single greatest scoring era in league history. What would Ovechkin do in a league where guys like Nicholls, Mogilny and Kurri were putting up 70 goal seasons?
Lemieux played in an era when having a sv% over .900 meant you were the Vezina favorite, in Ovechkin's era being at or under .900 gets you a trip to the AHL
Lots of stats, facts, context, and data from the Ovechkin side.
Lots of falsehoods, baseless assertions, style points, imagination, personal attacks, woulda coulda shoulda, and history revisions from the Lemieux side.
All the info is there, just need to interpret it correctly. You can see what they are doing by looking at the totals at the bottom.View attachment 985977
HF's adjusted totals adjust points for an 82 game season, but not the actual games played. This leads to very odd career totals such as the above here for Howie Morenz.
Until they fix their flawed methodology, I don't see it as having much value.
. "Generationally compiling" past a vastly superior peak or not is the question. Mario is likely the best goalscorer ever on a per game basis and id argue it's not all that close either….
If Lemieux was the better goal scorer, he would have led the nhl in gpg more than Ovie. Ovie did it 9 times to Lemieux’s 6.
Or at least Lemieux would have had the highest single season goal total of his generation. Or at least the highest adjusted total. Or the highest playoff total. Or the highest career total. Or led the league the most times. Here in real life Mario Lemieux accomplished none of those key achievements. Ovechkin achieved all of them.