Barracuda News & Discussion VII

Hobocop

ungainly and rambling
Jul 18, 2012
3,939
5,126
San Jose


Didn't feel like we looked dangerous on offense this afternoon, but I didn't really feel like Toronto did, either. Combine that with their goalie making a couple big saves and two or three questionable penalties called on us, and you get the above result. Better luck tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

knu

Registered User
Feb 28, 2012
981
490
Fremont CA


Didn't feel like we looked dangerous on offense this afternoon, but I didn't really feel like Toronto did, either. Combine that with their goalie making a couple big saves and two or three questionable penalties called on us, and you get the above result. Better luck tomorrow.

It's been 8 games now. How does Muk look?
 

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
16,866
6,365
It's been 8 games now. How does Muk look?
2 points. Not a great sign.

You have to think that even next year, the Sharks will start with Ferraro, Walman, and Liljegren. Thompson is playing his way into a permanent spot.

That's leaves two spots for Thrun, Mukhamadullin, Cagnoni, and Dickinson. Also, I imagine that the Sharks want one more veteran defender, so perhaps just one spot is available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Hobocop

ungainly and rambling
Jul 18, 2012
3,939
5,126
San Jose


Carriere in net, with an EBUG. Romanov not available (no explanation as to why). Meanwhile the Marlies go with Matt Murray in net.

Coe and Furlong in, Carlsson and Houle out.

This play by play guy absolutely loves Brandon Coe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Hobocop

ungainly and rambling
Jul 18, 2012
3,939
5,126
San Jose
End of the first. Cuda mostly in control, but not really a lot going on. One power play apiece, shots are 6-3 SJ.

We have been pretty good on the forecheck.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Hobocop

ungainly and rambling
Jul 18, 2012
3,939
5,126
San Jose
Ugh. Marlies score with 7 seconds left in the second on a rebound. Bounced right to Stevens. I was actually just thinking to myself it was going to take a bit of a lucky bounce to break the deadlock.

Marlies had some good chances in the second, but this is still a really tight game. 1-0 Toronto, end of two.

Looking at the replay, I have no idea where tf Keane (94) was going on this play:

 

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,421
21,327
Vegass
Ugh. Marlies score with 7 seconds left in the second on a rebound. Bounced right to Stevens. I was actually just thinking to myself it was going to take a bit of a lucky bounce to break the deadlock.

Marlies had some good chances in the second, but this is still a really tight game. 1-0 Toronto, end of two.

Looking at the replay, I have no idea where tf Keane (94) was going on this play:


I have no idea what Keane brings
 

Lebanezer

I'unno? Coast Guard?
Jul 24, 2006
15,687
12,503
San Jose
My issue with an analysis like this is that if Cagnoni had a 16% chance of becoming a superstar and a 58% chance of being an NHLer in his draft year, then there's no way he goes in the 4th round. I'm wondering how many other prospects had a similar profile to Fox but flamed out?
It’s all statistical probabilities. As in, based mostly on player statistics, league trends etc. Height clearly played a part in him dropping. They can’t really come up with a relatively accurate way to incorporate more complex attributes like height, coachability etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cas

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
16,866
6,365
It’s all statistical probabilities. As in, based mostly on player statistics, league trends etc. Height clearly played a part in him dropping. They can’t really come up with a relatively accurate way to incorporate more complex attributes like height, coachability etc.
Yeah, my point is that figuring all those things in, teams around the clearly felt that his probabilities were much lower.
 

Jargon

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
6,503
11,792
Venice, California
Yeah, my point is that figuring all those things in, teams around the clearly felt that his probabilities were much lower.

I think it’s height and skating speed (he’s a good skater but he’s not Cale Makar). But neither seem to be an impediment to him so far at the AHL level — which I think already makes him pretty special (ie beating what people expected).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

JoeThorntonsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,486
25,727
Fremont, CA
It’s all statistical probabilities. As in, based mostly on player statistics, league trends etc. Height clearly played a part in him dropping. They can’t really come up with a relatively accurate way to incorporate more complex attributes like height, coachability etc.
You can incorporate height/weight into a model. Mine includes height and is far less bullish on Cagnoni's star probability. I don't believe Byron's does.

Screenshot 2024-11-24 at 6.40.04 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: NiWa and Lebanezer

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad